2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Refinement of the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire: cognitive interviews with women and healthcare professionals and a validation survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Measuring positive and negative aspects of well-being during pregnancy and childbirth is important for both healthy women and women who are living with long-term health conditions (LTCs). This study aimed to further refine the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire and to incorporate LTC specific items where appropriate.

          Methods

          A multi-method study. Cognitive interviews with pregnant or postpartum women ( n = 11) and consultations with healthcare professionals ( n = 11) and public representatives ( n = 4) were conducted to explore the acceptability of existing WiP items and content. Items were refined and subsequently administered on an online survey ( n = 768). Item reduction steps and exploratory factor analysis were performed on survey data. Convergent validity was examined using Pearson correlation coefficients to compare relationships with other included validated assessments.

          Results

          Following amendments to three items, the addition of eight core WiP items and five LTC specific items, a total of 25 items were considered relevant and appropriate for use with pregnant women. Analysis of survey data reduced the questionnaire to 12 items measuring three core WiP scales; 1) Concerns over support after birth, 2) Positive pregnancy and, 3) Confidence about motherhood, and a five item standalone LTC specific scale. All scales demonstrated good validity and internal reliability. Scores for the three core scales moderately correlated with established well-being measures indicating that they were measuring similar, yet distinct concepts.

          Conclusions

          Analyses confirmed good psychometric properties of the refined WiP questionnaire. The use of pregnancy specific well-being measures, such as the WiP, provide a route into asking women in more detail about how their care may be tailored to support them and also facilitates positive conversations with women about how care and experience of pregnancy and childbirth may be enhanced further.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04626-x.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

          Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

            In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

              This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Fiona.alderdice@npeu.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                15 April 2022
                15 April 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 325
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Harris Manchester College, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, NIHR Policy Research Unit Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, , University of Oxford, ; Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-5644
                Article
                4626
                10.1186/s12884-022-04626-x
                9013132
                1938a536-7a81-402a-9c27-17060b5d1486
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 29 October 2021
                : 27 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                maternity care,patient-reported outcomes,questionnaire,chronic conditions,pregnancy,well-being

                Comments

                Comment on this article