31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deciding Which Way to Go: How Do Insects Alter Movements to Negotiate Barriers?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Animals must routinely deal with barriers as they move through their natural environment. These challenges require directed changes in leg movements and posture performed in the context of ever changing internal and external conditions. In particular, cockroaches use a combination of tactile and visual information to evaluate objects in their path in order to effectively guide their movements in complex terrain. When encountering a large block, the insect uses its antennae to evaluate the object’s height then rears upward accordingly before climbing. A shelf presents a choice between climbing and tunneling that depends on how the antennae strike the shelf; tapping from above yields climbing, while tapping from below causes tunneling. However, ambient light conditions detected by the ocelli can bias that decision. Similarly, in a T-maze turning is determined by antennal contact but influenced by visual cues. These multi-sensory behaviors led us to look at the central complex as a center for sensori-motor integration within the insect brain. Visual and antennal tactile cues are processed within the central complex and, in tethered preparations, several central complex units changed firing rates in tandem with or prior to altered step frequency or turning, while stimulation through the implanted electrodes evoked these same behavioral changes. To further test for a central complex role in these decisions, we examined behavioral effects of brain lesions. Electrolytic lesions in restricted regions of the central complex generated site specific behavioral deficits. Similar changes were also found in reversible effects of procaine injections in the brain. Finally, we are examining these kinds of decisions made in a large arena that more closely matches the conditions under which cockroaches forage. Overall, our studies suggest that CC circuits may indeed influence the descending commands associated with navigational decisions, thereby making them more context dependent.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices.

          Collective behavior based on self-organization has been shown in group-living animals from insects to vertebrates. These findings have stimulated engineers to investigate approaches for the coordination of autonomous multirobot systems based on self-organization. In this experimental study, we show collective decision-making by mixed groups of cockroaches and socially integrated autonomous robots, leading to shared shelter selection. Individuals, natural or artificial, are perceived as equivalent, and the collective decision emerges from nonlinear feedbacks based on local interactions. Even when in the minority, robots can modulate the collective decision-making process and produce a global pattern not observed in their absence. These results demonstrate the possibility of using intelligent autonomous devices to study and control self-organized behavioral patterns in group-living animals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The central complex and the genetic dissection of locomotor behaviour.

            The central complex is one of the most prominent, yet functionally enigmatic structures of the insect brain. Recently, behavioural, neuroanatomical and molecular approaches in Drosophila have joined forces to disclose specific components of higher locomotion control in larvae and adult flies, such as those that guarantee the optimal length and across-body symmetry of strides and an appropriate activity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maplike representation of celestial E-vector orientations in the brain of an insect.

              For many insects, the polarization pattern of the blue sky serves as a compass cue for spatial navigation. E-vector orientations are detected by photoreceptors in a dorsal rim area of the eye. Polarized-light signals from both eyes are finally integrated in the central complex, a brain area consisting of two subunits, the protocerebral bridge and the central body. Here we show that a topographic representation of zenithal E-vector orientations underlies the columnar organization of the protocerebral bridge in a locust. The maplike arrangement is highly suited to signal head orientation under the open sky.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                29 April 2012
                06 July 2012
                2012
                : 6
                : 97
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simpleDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH, USA
                [2] 2simpleDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, USA
                [3] 3simpleMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve UniversityA Cleveland, OH, US
                Author notes

                Edited by: Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

                Reviewed by: Ansgar Buschges, University of Cologne, Germany; Philip Newland, University of Southampton, UK; Volker Dürr, Bielefeld University, Germany

                *Correspondence: Roy E. Ritzmann, Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA. e-mail: roy.ritzmann@ 123456case.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, a specialty of Frontiers in Neuroscience.

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2012.00097
                3390555
                22783160
                53ce3f53-2e93-4664-8d3a-dfe52daeb645
                Copyright © 2012 Ritzmann, Harley, Daltorio, Tietz, Pollack, Bender, Guo, Horomanski, Kathman, Nieuwoudt, Brown and Quinn.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 23 January 2012
                : 13 June 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 97, Pages: 16, Words: 13545
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                barriers,insect brain,electrolytic lesion,foraging in arena,tethered walking,procaine injection,central complex,multi-channel recording

                Comments

                Comment on this article