25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The symptomatology after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is complex as symptoms are subjective and nonspecific. It is important to differentiate symptoms as neurologically based or caused by noninjury factors. Symptom exaggeration has been found to influence postinjury presentation, and objective validity tests are used to help differentiate these cases. This study examines how concussed patients seen for initial medical workup may present with noncredible effort during follow-up neuropsychological examination and identifies physical findings during evaluation that best predict noncredible performance.

          Hypothesis:

          A portion of pediatric patients will demonstrate noncredible effort during neuropsychological testing after mTBI, predicted by failure of certain vestibular and cognitive tests during initial examination.

          Study Design:

          Retrospective cohort.

          Level of Evidence:

          Level 4.

          Methods:

          Participants (n = 80) underwent evaluation by a sports medicine physician ≤3 months from injury, were subsequently seen for a neuropsychological examination, and completed the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT). Variables included results of a mental status examination (orientation), serial 7s examination, Romberg test, and heel-to-toe walking test. The primary outcome variable of interest was pass/fail of the MSVT.

          Results:

          Of the participants, 51% were male and 49% were female. Eighteen of 80 (23%) failed the MSVT. Based on univariable logistic regression analysis, the outcomes of the Romberg test ( P = 0.0037) and heel-to-toe walking test( P = 0.0066) were identified as significant independent predictors of MSVT failure. In a multivariable model, outcome of Romberg test was the only significant predictor of MSVT failure. The probability of MSVT failure was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.3% to 88.9%) when a subject failed the Romberg test.

          Conclusion:

          A meaningful percentage of pediatric subjects present evidence of noncredible performance during neuropsychological examination after mTBI. Initial examination findings in some cases may represent symptom exaggeration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview.

          Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem in the United States and worldwide. The estimated 5.3 million Americans living with TBI-related disability face numerous challenges in their efforts to return to a full and productive life. This article presents an overview of the epidemiology and impact of TBI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering

            During the past two decades clinical and research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and effective methods and instruments designed to detect exaggeration or fabrication of neuropsychological dysfunction, as well as somatic and psychological symptom complaints. A vast literature based on relevant research has emerged and substantial portions of professional meetings attended by clinical neuropsychologists have addressed topics related to malingering (Sweet, King, Malina, Bergman, & Simmons, 2002). Yet, despite these extensive activities, understanding the need for methods of detecting problematic effort and response bias and addressing the presence or absence of malingering has proven challenging for practitioners. A consensus conference, comprised of national and international experts in clinical neuropsychology, was held at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) for the purposes of refinement of critical issues in this area. This consensus statement documents the current state of knowledge and recommendations of expert clinical neuropsychologists and is intended to assist clinicians and researchers with regard to the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests.

              Cut-off scores defining clinically atypical patterns of performance were identified for five standard neuropsychological and psychological tests: Benton Visual Form Discrimination (VFD), Fingertapping (FT), WAIS-R Reliable Digit Span (RDS), Wisconsin Card Sorting Failure-to-Maintain Set (FMS), and the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale (FBS) from the MMPI-2. All possible pair-wise combinations of scores beyond cut-off (e.g., for VFD and FT; for RDS and FBS), correctly identified 21 of 24 subjects (87.5%) meeting criteria for definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction, and 24 of 27 (88.9%) subjects with moderate to severe closed head injury. On cross-validation, 15 of 17 subjects (88.2%) meeting criteria for probable malingered neurocognitive dysfunction were correctly identified, with 13 of 13 nonlitigating neurologic patients, and 14 of 14 nonlitigating psychiatric patients correctly classified as having motivationally-preserved performance. Combining the derivation and cross-validation samples yielded a sensitivity of 87.8%, specificity of 94.4%, and combined hit rate of 91.6%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sports Health
                Sports Health
                SPH
                spsph
                Sports Health
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1941-7381
                1941-0921
                September 2014
                September 2014
                : 6
                : 5
                : 410-415
                Affiliations
                []Sports Medicine Program for Young Athletes, Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
                []Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
                [§ ]Musculoskeletal Research Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
                []Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Aaron J. Provance, MD, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 (e-mail: aaron.provance@ 123456childrenscolorado.org ).
                Article
                10.1177_1941738114544444
                10.1177/1941738114544444
                4137681
                25177417
                5411046c-9eaf-49c8-89e6-a0c6117d86cf
                © 2014 The Author(s)
                History
                Categories
                Primary Care
                Custom metadata
                September/October 2014

                Sports medicine
                mild traumatic brain injury,pediatric,symptom validity testing,sports medicine
                Sports medicine
                mild traumatic brain injury, pediatric, symptom validity testing, sports medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article