10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Metabolite profiles reveal interspecific variation in operation of the Calvin–Benson cycle in both C 4 and C 3 plants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interspecific divergence in metabolite profiles in C 3 and C 4 species points to differing evolutionary trajectories of the Calvin–Benson cycle in different seed plant lineages

          Abstract

          Low atmospheric CO 2 in recent geological time led to the evolution of carbon-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) such as C 4 photosynthesis in >65 terrestrial plant lineages. We know little about the impact of low CO 2 on the Calvin–Benson cycle (CBC) in C 3 species that did not evolve CCMs, representing >90% of terrestrial plant species. Metabolite profiling provides a top-down strategy to investigate the operational balance in a pathway. We profiled CBC intermediates in a panel of C 4 ( Zea mays, Setaria viridis, Flaveria bidentis, and F. trinervia) and C 3 species ( Oryza sativa, Triticium aestivum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum, and Manihot esculenta). Principal component analysis revealed differences between C 4 and C 3 species that were driven by many metabolites, including lower ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate in C 4 species. Strikingly, there was also considerable variation between C 3 species. This was partly due to different chlorophyll and protein contents, but mainly to differences in relative levels of metabolites. Correlation analysis indicated that one contributory factor was the balance between fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase, phosphoribulokinase, and Rubisco. Our results point to the CBC having experienced different evolutionary trajectories in C 3 species since the ancestors of modern plant lineages diverged. They underline the need to understand CBC operation in a wide range of species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species.

          Various aspects of the biochemistry of photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants are integrated into a form compatible with studies of gas exchange in leaves. These aspects include the kinetic properties of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase; the requirements of the photosynthetic carbon reduction and photorespiratory carbon oxidation cycles for reduced pyridine nucleotides; the dependence of electron transport on photon flux and the presence of a temperature dependent upper limit to electron transport. The measurements of gas exchange with which the model outputs may be compared include those of the temperature and partial pressure of CO2(p(CO2)) dependencies of quantum yield, the variation of compensation point with temperature and partial pressure of O2(p(O2)), the dependence of net CO2 assimilation rate on p(CO2) and irradiance, and the influence of p(CO2) and irradiance on the temperature dependence of assimilation rate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.

            A series of experiments is presented investigating short term and long term changes of the nature of the response of rate of CO2 assimilation to intercellular p(CO2). The relationships between CO2 assimilation rate and biochemical components of leaf photosynthesis, such as ribulose-bisphosphate (RuP2) carboxylase-oxygenase activity and electron transport capacity are examined and related to current theory of CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. It was found that the response of the rate of CO2 assimilation to irradiance, partial pressure of O2, p(O2), and temperature was different at low and high intercellular p(CO2), suggesting that CO2 assimilation rate is governed by different processes at low and high intercellular p(CO2). In longer term changes in CO2 assimilation rate, induced by different growth conditions, the initial slope of the response of CO2 assimilation rate to intercellular p(CO2) could be correlated to in vitro measurements of RuP2 carboxylase activity. Also, CO2 assimilation rate at high p(CO2) could be correlated to in vitro measurements of electron transport rate. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that CO2 assimilation rate is limited by the RuP2 saturated rate of the RuP2 carboxylase-oxygenase at low intercellular p(CO2) and by the rate allowed by RuP2 regeneration capacity at high intercellular p(CO2).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants

              The photosynthetic capacity of leaves is related to the nitrogen content primarily bacause the proteins of the Calvin cycle and thylakoids represent the majority of leaf nitrogen. To a first approximation, thylakoid nitrogen is proportional to the chlorophyll content (50 mol thylakoid N mol-1 Chl). Within species there are strong linear relationships between nitrogen and both RuBP carboxylase and chlorophyll. With increasing nitrogen per unit leaf area, the proportion of total leaf nitrogen in the thylakoids remains the same while the proportion in soluble protein increases. In many species, growth under lower irradiance greatly increases the partitioning of nitrogen into chlorophyll and the thylakoids, while the electron transport capacity per unit of chlorophyll declines. If growth irradiance influences the relationship between photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen content, predicting nitrogen distribution between leaves in a canopy becomes more complicated. When both photosynthetic capacity and leaf nitrogen content are expressed on the basis of leaf area, considerable variation in the photosynthetic capacity for a given leaf nitrogen content is found between species. The variation reflects different strategies of nitrogen partitioning, the electron transport capacity per unit of chlorophyll and the specific activity of RuBP carboxylase. Survival in certain environments clearly does not require maximising photosynthetic capacity for a given leaf nitrogen content. Species that flourish in the shade partition relatively more nitrogen into the thylakoids, although this is associated with lower photosynthetic capacity per unit of nitrogen.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Exp Bot
                J. Exp. Bot
                exbotj
                Journal of Experimental Botany
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                0022-0957
                1460-2431
                01 March 2019
                18 February 2019
                18 February 2019
                : 70
                : 6
                : 1843-1858
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muehlenberg, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
                [2 ]School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA, Australia
                Author notes
                Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 Vine Str, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
                Present address: Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, CNRS - Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-6950
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-6947
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-7722
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-730X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-335X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-7602
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-3004
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-2615
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9383-2145
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-7322
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-1763
                Article
                erz051
                10.1093/jxb/erz051
                6436152
                30773587
                54391307-bf0d-45bb-b9d3-2239f76319c8
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 October 2018
                : 29 January 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Categories
                Research Papers
                Photosynthesis and Metabolism

                Plant science & Botany
                c4,c3,calvin–benson cycle,interspecies variation,metabolite profiles,photosynthesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article