13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Understanding reasons for and against vaccination from the parental perspective is critical for designing vaccination campaigns and informing other interventions to increase vaccination uptake in Canada. The objective of this study was to understand maternal vaccination decision making for children.

          Methods

          Mothers participating in a longitudinal community-based pregnancy cohort, the All Our Babies study in Calgary, Alberta, completed open-ended survey questions providing explanations for the vaccination status of their child by 24 months postpartum. Qualitative responses were linked to administrative vaccination records to examine survey responses and recorded child vaccination status.

          Results

          There were 1560 open-ended responses available; 89% ( n = 1391) provided explanations for vaccinating their children, 5% ( n = 79) provided explanations for not vaccinating/delaying, and 6% ( n = 90) provided explanations for both. Themes were similar for those vaccinating and not vaccinating/delaying; however, interpretations were different. Two broad themes were identified: Sources of influence and Deliberative Processes. Sources of influence on decision making included personal, family, and external experiences. Deliberative Processes included risk, research, effectiveness, and balancing risks/benefits. Under Deliberative Processes, responsibility was a category for those vaccinating; while choice, instrumental/practical, and health issues were categories for those not vaccinating/delaying. Mothers’ levels of conviction and motivation provided a Context for understanding their decision making perspectives.

          Conclusions

          Vaccination decision making is complex and impacted by many factors that are similar but contribute to different decisions depending on mothers’ perspectives. The results of this study indicate the need to examine new intervention approaches to increase uptake that recognize and address feelings of pressure and parental commitment to choice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The association of neighbourhood and individual social capital with consistent self-rated health: a longitudinal study in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women

          Background Social conditions, social relationships and neighbourhood environment, the components of social capital, are important determinants of health. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of neighbourhood and individual social capital with consistent self-rated health in women between the first trimester of pregnancy and six months postpartum. Methods A multilevel cohort study in 34 neighbourhoods was performed on 685 Brazilian women recruited at antenatal units in two cities in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Self-rated health (SRH) was assessed in the 1st trimester of pregnancy (baseline) and six months after childbirth (follow-up). The participants were divided into two groups: 1. Good SRH – good SRH at baseline and follow-up, and, 2. Poor SRH – poor SRH at baseline and follow-up. Exploratory variables collected at baseline included neighbourhood social capital (neighbourhood-level variable), individual social capital (social support and social networks), demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health-related behaviours and self-reported diseases. A hierarchical binomial multilevel analysis was performed to test the association between neighbourhood and individual social capital and SRH, adjusted for covariates. Results The Good SRH group reported higher scores of social support and social networks than the Poor SRH group. Although low neighbourhood social capital was associated with poor SRH in crude analysis, the association was not significant when individual socio-demographic variables were included in the model. In the final model, women reporting poor SRH both at baseline and follow-up had lower levels of social support (positive social interaction) [OR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90)] and a lower likelihood of friendship social networks [OR 0.61 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99)] than the Good SRH group. The characteristics that remained associated with poor SRH were low level of schooling, Black and Brown ethnicity, more children, urinary infection and water plumbing outside the house. Conclusions Low individual social capital during pregnancy, considered here as social support and social network, was independently associated with poor SRH in women whereas neighbourhood social capital did not affect women’s SRH during pregnancy and the months thereafter. From pregnancy and up to six months postpartum, the effect of individual social capital explained better the consistency of SRH over time than neighbourhood social capital.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bracketing in Qualitative Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy.

              Parental vaccine hesitancy is a growing problem affecting the health of children and the larger population. This article describes the evolution of the vaccine hesitancy movement and the individual, vaccine-specific and societal factors contributing to this phenomenon. In addition, potential strategies to mitigate the rising tide of parent vaccine reluctance and refusal are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                debbie.mcneil@ahs.ca
                +1 403 955 0875 , melissa.mueller2@ahs.ca
                smacdon@ualberta.ca
                sheilaw.mcdonald@ahs.ca
                vineet.saini@ahs.ca
                jim.kellner@ahs.ca
                stough@ucalgary.ca
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                10 January 2019
                10 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 49
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0693 8815, GRID grid.413574.0, Maternal Newborn Child and Youth Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, GRID grid.22072.35, University of Calgary, Faculty of Nursing and Cumming School of Medicine Department of Community Health Sciences, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0684 7358, GRID grid.413571.5, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0693 8815, GRID grid.413574.0, Research and Innovation, Population Public and Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, Southport Atrium, ; 10101 Southport Road S.W, Calgary, Alberta T2W 3N2 Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Faculty of Nursing, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, Alberta Canada
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, GRID grid.22072.35, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Calgary, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, GRID grid.22072.35, University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, GRID grid.22072.35, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, , University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-5489
                Article
                6338
                10.1186/s12889-018-6338-0
                6327385
                30630511
                55264aec-7d68-4f23-b328-fd9ed8a02808
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 April 2018
                : 17 December 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Public health
                childhood vaccination,immunization,maternal perspective,qualitative analysis
                Public health
                childhood vaccination, immunization, maternal perspective, qualitative analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article