Preventing Cyberbullying and Reducing Its Negative Impact on Students Using E-Parenting: A Scoping Review

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Families have an important role in preventing cyberbullying and providing first treatment for their children. The negative impact of cyberbullying are psychological problems such as anxiety, depression, and stress. One of the interventions to reduce the negative impact of cyberbullying is e-parenting. The aim of this study is to describe the methods in e-parenting to prevent and reduce the impact of cyberbullying on students. This study used the scoping review method. Articles for this review were drawn from CINAHL, PubMed, and ProQuest databases. The keywords used in English are “Cyberbullying”, “E-parenting”, and “Students”. The inclusion criteria were full text, randomized control trial or quasi-experimental research design, English language, student sample, and the publication period of the last 10 years (2013–2022). We found 11 articles which discussed e-parenting to prevent and reduce the negative impact of cyberbullying on students. The results of the study showed that e-parenting was effective in preventing cyberbullying and reducing its negative impact with three methods of e-parenting, namely prevention program, collaboration with the school, and video support. Most of the articles in this study used a randomized control trial design. Some articles in this scoping review are from Spain. Samples in the literature range between 35 and 2530 students. E-parenting is used as an intervention to increase the role of parents in preventing and reducing the negative effects of cyberbullying through collaboration with health and school workers.

Related collections

Most cited references 91

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Adrian Aldcroft, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin … (2018)

Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.

0 comments Cited 7158 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.

Robin M Kowalski, Gary W Giumetti, Amber Schroeder … (2014)

Although the Internet has transformed the way our world operates, it has also served as a venue for cyberbullying, a serious form of misbehavior among youth. With many of today's youth experiencing acts of cyberbullying, a growing body of literature has begun to document the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of this behavior, but the literature is highly fragmented and lacks theoretical focus. Therefore, our purpose in the present article is to provide a critical review of the existing cyberbullying research. The general aggression model is proposed as a useful theoretical framework from which to understand this phenomenon. Additionally, results from a meta-analytic review are presented to highlight the size of the relationships between cyberbullying and traditional bullying, as well as relationships between cyberbullying and other meaningful behavioral and psychological variables. Mixed effects meta-analysis results indicate that among the strongest associations with cyberbullying perpetration were normative beliefs about aggression and moral disengagement, and the strongest associations with cyberbullying victimization were stress and suicidal ideation. Several methodological and sample characteristics served as moderators of these relationships. Limitations of the meta-analysis include issues dealing with causality or directionality of these associations as well as generalizability for those meta-analytic estimates that are based on smaller sets of studies (k < 5). Finally, the present results uncover important areas for future research. We provide a relevant agenda, including the need for understanding the incremental impact of cyberbullying (over and above traditional bullying) on key behavioral and psychological outcomes.

0 comments Cited 369 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process.

Jessica Peterson, Patricia F Pearce, Laurie Anne Ferguson … (2017)

Scoping review design represents a methodology that allows assessment of emerging evidence, as well as a first step in research development. Despite its increasing use, to date no article reflecting use of scoping review methodology has been submitted for review at JAANP. The purpose of this article is to provide detailed information on scoping reviews, including definition, related processes, and uses, and discuss the relationship to nurse practitioner (NP) practice, policy, education, and research. The longer-term goal is that NPs will understand the related techniques, consider the methodology as a viable one for NP scholarship, and bring related reports to the forefront of NP publications.