44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of common cancers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          The ability to identify a specific cancer using minimally invasive biopsy holds great promise for improving diagnosis and prognosis. We evaluated the utility of DNA methylation profiles for differentiating tumors and normal tissues for four common cancers (lung, breast, colon, and liver) and found that they could differentiate cancerous tissue from normal tissue with >95% accuracy. This signature also correctly identified 19 of 20 breast cancer metastases and 29 of 30 colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. We report that methylation patterns can predict the prognosis and survival, with good correlation between differential methylation of CpG sites and expression of cancer-associated genes. Their findings demonstrate the utility of methylation biomarkers for the molecular characterization, diagnosis, and prognosis of cancer.

          Abstract

          The ability to identify a specific cancer using minimally invasive biopsy holds great promise for improving the diagnosis, treatment selection, and prediction of prognosis in cancer. Using whole-genome methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and machine learning methods, we evaluated the utility of DNA methylation for differentiating tumor tissue and normal tissue for four common cancers (breast, colon, liver, and lung). We identified cancer markers in a training cohort of 1,619 tumor samples and 173 matched adjacent normal tissue samples. We replicated our findings in a separate TCGA cohort of 791 tumor samples and 93 matched adjacent normal tissue samples, as well as an independent Chinese cohort of 394 tumor samples and 324 matched adjacent normal tissue samples. The DNA methylation analysis could predict cancer versus normal tissue with more than 95% accuracy in these three cohorts, demonstrating accuracy comparable to typical diagnostic methods. This analysis also correctly identified 29 of 30 colorectal cancer metastases to the liver and 32 of 34 colorectal cancer metastases to the lung. We also found that methylation patterns can predict prognosis and survival. We correlated differential methylation of CpG sites predictive of cancer with expression of associated genes known to be important in cancer biology, showing decreased expression with increased methylation, as expected. We verified gene expression profiles in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the utility of methylation biomarkers for the molecular characterization of cancer, with implications for diagnosis and prognosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The history of cancer epigenetics.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas

            Protein levels and function are poorly predicted by genomic and transcriptomic analysis of patient tumors. Therefore, direct study of the functional proteome has the potential to provide a wealth of information that complements and extends genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projects. Here we use reverse-phase protein arrays to analyze 3,467 patient samples from 11 TCGA “Pan-Cancer” diseases, using 181 high-quality antibodies that target 128 total proteins and 53 post-translationally modified proteins. The resultant proteomic data is integrated with genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the same samples to identify commonalities, differences, emergent pathways and network biology within and across tumor lineages. In addition, tissue-specific signals are reduced computationally to enhance biomarker and target discovery spanning multiple tumor lineages. This integrative analysis, with an emphasis on pathways and potentially actionable proteins, provides a framework for determining the prognostic, predictive and therapeutic relevance of the functional proteome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epigenetic interplay between histone modifications and DNA methylation in gene silencing.

              Knowledge on heritable changes in gene expression that result from epigenetic events is of increasing relevance in the development of strategies for prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Histone acetylation and DNA methylation are epigenetic modifications whose patterns can be regarded as heritable marks that ensure accurate transmission of the chromatin states and gene expression profiles over many cell generations. Importantly, patterns and levels of DNA methylation and histone acetylation are profoundly altered in human cancers. Accumulating evidence suggests that an epigenetic cross-talk, i.e. interplay between DNA methylation and histone acetylation, may be involved in the process of gene transcription and aberrant gene silencing in tumours. Although the molecular mechanism of gene activation is relatively well understood, the hierarchical order of events and dependencies leading to gene silencing in the course of cancer development remain largely unknown. While some studies suggest that DNA methylation patterns guide histone modifications (including histone acetylation and methylation) during gene silencing, other studies argue that DNA methylation takes its cues primarily from histone modification states. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the interplay between DNA methylation and histone modifications during gene silencing and its importance in the integration of environmental and intrinsic stimuli in the control of gene expression. We also discuss the importance of an epigenetic cross-talk in the protection against genetic changes in response to environmental genotoxins as well as the implication for cancer therapy and prevention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                11 July 2017
                26 June 2017
                : 114
                : 28
                : 7414-7419
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University , Xi'an 710032, China;
                [2] bState Key Laboratory of Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center , Guangzhou 510060, China;
                [3] cInstitute for Genomic Medicine, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, CA 92093;
                [4] dShanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China;
                [5] eShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Shanghai 210602, China;
                [6] f Guangzhou Youze Biological Pharmaceutical Technology Company Ltd. , Guangzhou 510005, China;
                [7] gDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, CA 92328;
                [8] h Veterans Administration Healthcare System , San Diego, CA 92093
                Author notes

                Contributed by Michael Karin, May 24, 2017 (sent for review March 3, 2017; reviewed by Hakon Hakonarson and Wei Zhang)

                Author contributions: X.H., M. Karin, R.-H.X., and K.Z. designed research; X.H., H.L., M. Krawczyk, W. Wei, W. Wang, J.W., K.F., H.Z., S.Y., M.J., D.L., C.C., G.L., W.S., L. Zheng, R.H., Jie Zhu, X.F., E.Z., and C.Z. performed research; J.H., B.A.C., D.D., L. Zhao, and Jian-Kang Zhu analyzed data; and X.H., M. Karin, R.-H.X., and K.Z. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers: H.H., Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; and W.Z., Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center.

                1X.H., H.L., M. Krawczyk, W. Wei, W. Wang, and J.W. contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PMC5514741 PMC5514741 5514741 201703577
                10.1073/pnas.1703577114
                5514741
                28652331
                55c9bbb4-0598-4674-819e-7eb6e52a77ca
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Medical Sciences

                DNA methylation,cancer diagnosis,cancer prognosis,gene expression,survival analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article