16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deep Learning for Deep Chemistry: Optimizing the Prediction of Chemical Patterns

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Computational Chemistry is currently a synergistic assembly between ab initio calculations, simulation, machine learning (ML) and optimization strategies for describing, solving and predicting chemical data and related phenomena. These include accelerated literature searches, analysis and prediction of physical and quantum chemical properties, transition states, chemical structures, chemical reactions, and also new catalysts and drug candidates. The generalization of scalability to larger chemical problems, rather than specialization, is now the main principle for transforming chemical tasks in multiple fronts, for which systematic and cost-effective solutions have benefited from ML approaches, including those based on deep learning (e.g. quantum chemistry, molecular screening, synthetic route design, catalysis, drug discovery). The latter class of ML algorithms is capable of combining raw input into layers of intermediate features, enabling bench-to-bytes designs with the potential to transform several chemical domains. In this review, the most exciting developments concerning the use of ML in a range of different chemical scenarios are described. A range of different chemical problems and respective rationalization, that have hitherto been inaccessible due to the lack of suitable analysis tools, is thus detailed, evidencing the breadth of potential applications of these emerging multidimensional approaches. Focus is given to the models, algorithms and methods proposed to facilitate research on compound design and synthesis, materials design, prediction of binding, molecular activity, and soft matter behavior. The information produced by pairing Chemistry and ML, through data-driven analyses, neural network predictions and monitoring of chemical systems, allows (i) prompting the ability to understand the complexity of chemical data, (ii) streamlining and designing experiments, (ii) discovering new molecular targets and materials, and also (iv) planning or rethinking forthcoming chemical challenges. In fact, optimization engulfs all these tasks directly.

          Related collections

          Most cited references128

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Machine learning for molecular and materials science

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI

              To plan the syntheses of small organic molecules, chemists use retrosynthesis, a problem-solving technique in which target molecules are recursively transformed into increasingly simpler precursors. Computer-aided retrosynthesis would be a valuable tool but at present it is slow and provides results of unsatisfactory quality. Here we use Monte Carlo tree search and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) to discover retrosynthetic routes. We combined Monte Carlo tree search with an expansion policy network that guides the search, and a filter network to pre-select the most promising retrosynthetic steps. These deep neural networks were trained on essentially all reactions ever published in organic chemistry. Our system solves for almost twice as many molecules, thirty times faster than the traditional computer-aided search method, which is based on extracted rules and hand-designed heuristics. In a double-blind AB test, chemists on average considered our computer-generated routes to be equivalent to reported literature routes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Chem
                Front Chem
                Front. Chem.
                Frontiers in Chemistry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2646
                26 November 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 809
                Affiliations
                Coimbra Chemistry Centre, CQC, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                Author notes

                Edited by: Emilio Martinez-Nunez, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain

                Reviewed by: Feng Wang, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia; Anakuthil Anoop, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India; Ruby Srivastava, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), India

                *Correspondence: Tânia F. G. G. Cova tfirmino@ 123456qui.uc.pt
                Alberto A. C. C. Pais pais@ 123456qui.uc.pt

                This article was submitted to Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry

                Article
                10.3389/fchem.2019.00809
                6988795
                32039134
                55eb1fd2-e5d9-4e50-b837-39dc01a4d3f7
                Copyright © 2019 Cova and Pais.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 July 2019
                : 11 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 171, Pages: 22, Words: 17039
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.13039/501100001871
                Award ID: UID/QUI/00313/2019
                Categories
                Chemistry
                Review

                machine-learning,deep-learning,optimization,models,molecular simulation,chemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article