12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scale validation in applied health research: tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol

      research-article
      Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
      Routledge
      Psychometrics, measurement, item response theory, reproducibility, open science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background: Applied health science research commonly measures concepts via multiple-item tools (scales), such as self-reported questionnaires or observation checklists. They are usually validated in more detail in separate psychometric studies or very cursorily in substantive studies. However, methodologists advise that, as validity is a property of the inferences based on measurement in a context, psychometric analyses should be performed in substantive studies as well. Until recently, performing comprehensive psychometrics required expert knowledge of different, often proprietary, software. The increasing availability of statistical techniques in the R environment now makes it possible to integrate such analyses in applied research.

          Methods: In this tutorial, I introduce a 6-step protocol which allows detailed diagnosis of core psychometric properties (e.g. structural validity, internal consistency) for scales with binary and ordinal response options aiming to measure differences in degree or quantity, the most common in applied research. The protocol includes investigations of (1) item distributions and summary statistics, item properties via (2) non-parametric and (3) parametric item response theory, (4) scale structure using factor analysis, (5) reliability via classical test theory, and (6) calculation and description of global scores. I illustrate the procedure on a measure of self-reported disability, the 24-item Sickness Impact Profile Roland Scale (RM-SIP), administered in a survey of 222 chronic pain sufferers. An R Markdown script is provided that generates reproducible reports.

          Results: In this sample, 15 of 24 RM-SIP items formed a unidimensional ordinal scale with good homogeneity ( H = 0.43) and reliability ( α = .86[.84–.89]; ω = .87[.85–.88]). The two versions were highly correlated ( r = .96), and regression models predicting RM-SIP disability produced comparable results.

          Conclusions: The example analysis illustrates how psychometric properties may be assessed in substantive studies and identify avenues for measure improvement. Applied researchers can adapt this script to perform and communicate these analyses as part of questionnaire validation and substantive studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Psychometric Theory.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Psychol Behav Med
                Health Psychol Behav Med
                Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
                Routledge
                2164-2850
                10 May 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 1
                : 136-161
                Affiliations
                Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER EA 7425), Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 , Lyon, France
                Author notes
                [CONTACT ] Alexandra L. Dima alexandra.dima@ 123456univ-lyon1.fr Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER EA 7425), Faculty of Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 , 8 Avenue Rockefeller, Lyon69373, France linkedin.com/in/alexandra-dima-695b3274
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-2242
                Article
                1472602
                10.1080/21642850.2018.1472602
                8133536
                34040826
                5719d8ff-1be9-4195-ab09-ee37f2099645
                © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 26
                Categories
                Research Article
                Advanced Methods in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine

                psychometrics,measurement,item response theory,reproducibility,open science

                Comments

                Comment on this article