12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      When Passion Appears, Exercise Addiction Disappears : Should Hundreds of Studies Not Considering Passion Be Revisited?

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. There are approximately 1,000 published articles on exercise addiction, which is characterized by exaggerated training yielding adverse effects. In contrast, there are less than 20 identified cases of exercise addiction in the literature. Recently, it was reported that there is an association between exercise addiction and passion. To test the impact of the latter on exercise addiction, we reanalyzed the combined data from two recent studies. High- and low-exercise volume groups differed in exercise addiction even after controlling for age and sex ( p < .001). However, after adding obsessive and harmonious passion as continuous predictor variables, the statistical significance vanished, whereas both predictors emerged as significant ( p < .001). Further, when controlled for the effect of passion, the correlation between exercise addiction and weekly exercise volume turned out to be negative. Therefore, a conceptual confound between the presumed risk of exercise addiction and passion could render the results of several hundreds of published works questionable. The current findings send an important message to scholars in the field: Studying exercise addiction without controlling for passion may yield false results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.

          Despite many articles reporting the problems of dichotomizing continuous measures, researchers still commonly use this practice. The authors' purpose in this article was to understand the reasons that people still dichotomize and to determine whether any of these reasons are valid. They contacted 66 researchers who had published articles using dichotomized variables and obtained their justifications for dichotomization. They also contacted 53 authors of articles published in Psychological Methods and asked them to identify any situations in which they believed dichotomized indicators could perform better. Justifications provided by these two groups fell into three broad categories, which the authors explored both logically and with Monte Carlo simulations. Continuous indicators were superior in the majority of circumstances and never performed substantially worse than the dichotomized indicators, but the simulations did reveal specific situations in which dichotomized indicators performed as well as or better than the original continuous indictors. The authors also considered several justifications for dichotomization that did not lend themselves to simulation, but in each case they found compelling arguments to address these situations using techniques other than dichotomization. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages.

            The passion scale, based on the dualistic model of passion, measures 2 distinct types of passion: Harmonious and obsessive passions are predictive of adaptive and less adaptive outcomes, respectively. In a substantive-methodological synergy, we evaluate the construct validity (factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity) of Passion Scale responses (N = 3,571). The exploratory structural equation model fit to the data was substantially better than the confirmatory factor analysis solution, and resulted in better differentiated (less correlated) factors. Results from a 13-model taxonomy of measurement invariance supported complete invariance (factor loadings, factor correlations, item uniquenesses, item intercepts, and latent means) over language (French vs. English; the instrument was originally devised in French, then translated into English) and gender. Strong measurement partial invariance over 5 passion activity groups (leisure, sport, social, work, education) indicates that the same set of items is appropriate for assessing passion across a wide variety of activities--a previously untested, implicit assumption that greatly enhances practical utility. Support was found for the convergent and discriminant validity of the harmonious and obsessive passion scales, based on a set of validity correlates: life satisfaction, rumination, conflict, time investment, activity liking and valuation, and perceiving the activity as a passion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                sjp
                Swiss Journal of Psychology
                Hogrefe AG, Bern
                1421-0185
                1662-0879
                2019
                : 78
                : 3-4
                : 137-142
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
                [ 2 ]Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
                [ 3 ]Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
                Author notes
                Prof. Attila Szabo, Ph.D., D.Sc., Professor of Psychology, Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Bogdánfy u. 10/B, 1117 Budapest, Hungary, E-mail szabo.attila@ 123456ppk.elte.hu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-4304
                Article
                sjp_78_3-4_137
                10.1024/1421-0185/a000228
                57ae2095-740e-4904-80af-2b7749f66fb4
                Copyright @ 2019
                History
                : August 9, 2018
                : March 7, 2019
                Categories
                Short Research Note

                Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                athlete,compulsory exercise,exercise abuse,exercise dependence,obligatory exercise,training

                Comments

                Comment on this article