1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Living Kidney Donor Phenotype and Likelihood of Postdonation Follow-up

      research-article
      , MPH 1 , , MPH 1 , , PhD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD MPH 1
      Transplantation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network requires that United States transplant centers maintain follow-up with living donors for 2 years postdonation, but lack of donor follow-up is pervasive. Donor characteristics, including younger age, minority race, and lower education, have been associated with incomplete follow-up, but it is unknown whether altruistic donors, having no prior connection to their recipient, differ from traditional donors in their likelihood of follow-up.

          Methods

          Utilizing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we examined all adult living kidney donors from 2005–2015 (n=63 592) classified as altruistic or traditional, and compared likelihood of 6-month medical follow-up using modified Poisson regression.

          Results

          Altruistic donors did not differ from traditional donors in likelihood of follow-up (aRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99–1.06). Among previously identified at-risk subgroups, however, altruistic donors were more likely to have follow-up than their traditional counterparts, including those who were younger (aRR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00–1.09), had less than college education (aRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00–1.11), and were unmarried (aRR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04–1.12). Having medical follow-up at 6 months was significantly associated with having follow-up at 1 (aRR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.75–1.93) and 2 years (aRR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.56–1.70) postdonation.

          Conclusions

          These data provide additional granularity on living donor phenotypes associated with short-term (6 month) postdonation follow-up, which is important given its association with future likelihood of follow-up. These findings offer the opportunity to tailor and direct educational efforts to increase living donor follow-up, particularly among groups at higher risk of loss to follow-up.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0132144
          7838
          Transplantation
          Transplantation
          Transplantation
          0041-1337
          1534-6080
          13 July 2017
          January 2018
          01 January 2019
          : 102
          : 1
          : 135-139
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute
          [2 ]University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
          Author notes
          [* ] Corresponding Author: Jayme E. Locke MD MPH (author from whom reprints will be available), University of Alabama at Birmingham, 701 19 th Street South, LHRB 748, Birmingham, AL 35294, (205) 934-2131, jlocke@ 123456uabmc.edu
          Article
          PMC5741543 PMC5741543 5741543 nihpa891940
          10.1097/TP.0000000000001881
          5741543
          28787311
          58137141-24c9-48a8-8b74-d0c564f56708
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article