7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Need to Develop Standard Measures of Patient Adherence for Big Data: Viewpoint

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite half a century of dedicated studies, medication adherence remains far from perfect, with many patients not taking their medications as prescribed. The magnitude of this problem is rising, jeopardizing the effectiveness of evidence-based therapies. An important reason for this is the unprecedented demographic change at the beginning of the 21st century. Aging leads to multimorbidity and complex therapeutic regimens that create a fertile ground for nonadherence. As this scenario is a global problem, it needs a worldwide answer. Could this answer be provided, given the new opportunities created by the digitization of health care? Daily, health-related information is being collected in electronic health records, pharmacy dispensing databases, health insurance systems, and national health system records. These big data repositories offer a unique chance to study adherence both retrospectively and prospectively at the population level, as well as its related factors. In order to make full use of this opportunity, there is a need to develop standardized measures of adherence, which can be applied globally to big data and will inform scientific research, clinical practice, and public health. These standardized measures may also enable a better understanding of the relationship between adherence and clinical outcomes, and allow for fair benchmarking of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adherence-targeting interventions. Unfortunately, despite this obvious need, such standards are still lacking. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to call for a consensus on global standards for measuring adherence with big data. More specifically, sound standards of formatting and analyzing big data are needed in order to assess, uniformly present, and compare patterns of medication adherence across studies. Wide use of these standards may improve adherence and make health care systems more effective and sustainable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review

            Objective To determine the economic impact of medication non-adherence across multiple disease groups. Design Systematic review. Evidence review A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus in September 2017. Studies quantifying the cost of medication non-adherence in relation to economic impact were included. Relevant information was extracted and quality assessed using the Drummond checklist. Results Seventy-nine individual studies assessing the cost of medication non-adherence across 14 disease groups were included. Wide-scoping cost variations were reported, with lower levels of adherence generally associated with higher total costs. The annual adjusted disease-specific economic cost of non-adherence per person ranged from $949 to $44 190 (in 2015 US$). Costs attributed to ‘all causes’ non-adherence ranged from $5271 to $52 341. Medication possession ratio was the metric most used to calculate patient adherence, with varying cut-off points defining non-adherence. The main indicators used to measure the cost of non-adherence were total cost or total healthcare cost (83% of studies), pharmacy costs (70%), inpatient costs (46%), outpatient costs (50%), emergency department visit costs (27%), medical costs (29%) and hospitalisation costs (18%). Drummond quality assessment yielded 10 studies of high quality with all studies performing partial economic evaluations to varying extents. Conclusion Medication non-adherence places a significant cost burden on healthcare systems. Current research assessing the economic impact of medication non-adherence is limited and of varying quality, failing to provide adaptable data to influence health policy. The correlation between increased non-adherence and higher disease prevalence should be used to inform policymakers to help circumvent avoidable costs to the healthcare system. Differences in methods make the comparison among studies challenging and an accurate estimation of true magnitude of the cost impossible. Standardisation of the metric measures used to estimate medication non-adherence and development of a streamlined approach to quantify costs is required. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015027338.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews

              Purpose: A number of potential determinants of medication non-adherence have been described so far. However, the heterogenic quality of existing publications poses the need for the use of a rigorous methodology in building a list of such determinants. The purpose of this study was a systematic review of current research on determinants of patient adherence on the basis of a recently agreed European consensus taxonomy and terminology. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, IPA, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for systematic reviews published between 2000/01/01 and 2009/12/31 that provided determinants on non-adherence to medication. The searches were limited to reviews having adherence to medication prescribed by health professionals for outpatient as a major topic. Results: Fifty-one reviews were included in this review, covering 19 different disease categories. In these reviews, exclusively assessing non-adherence to chronic therapies, 771 individual factor items were identified, of which most were determinants of implementation, and only 47—determinants of persistence with medication. Factors with an unambiguous effect on adherence were further grouped into 8 clusters of socio-economic-related factors, 6 of healthcare team- and system-related factors, 6 of condition-related factors, 6 of therapy-related factors, and 14 of patient-related factors. The lack of standardized definitions and use of poor measurement methods resulted in many inconsistencies. Conclusions: This study provides clear evidence that medication non-adherence is affected by multiple determinants. Therefore, the prediction of non-adherence of individual patients is difficult, and suitable measurement and multifaceted interventions may be the most effective answer toward unsatisfactory adherence. The limited number of publications assessing determinants of persistence with medication, and lack of those providing determinants of adherence to short-term treatment identify areas for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J. Med. Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                August 2020
                27 August 2020
                : 22
                : 8
                : e18150
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Family Medicine Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
                [2 ] Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department Zaragoza University Zaragoza Spain
                [3 ] Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón) Zaragoza Spain
                [4 ] UCIBIO REQUIMTE, ICBAS, Porto4Ageing - Competences Center on Active and Healthy Ageing Faculty of Pharmacy University of Porto Porto Portugal
                [5 ] Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland
                [6 ] IT Department Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Pavia Italy
                [7 ] Servei d’Atenció Primària Vallès Occidental Institut Català de la Salut Barcelona Spain
                [8 ] CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
                [9 ] Department of Pharmacy University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
                [10 ] Group of Research and Innovation in Biomedical Informatics, Biomedical Engineering and Health Economy, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBiS / Virgen del Rocío University Hospital / CSIC / University of Seville Seville Spain
                [11 ] International Commitee, Muy Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos Valencia Spain
                [12 ] AARDEX Group Seraing Belgium
                [13 ] Liège University Liège Belgium
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Przemyslaw Kardas pkardas@ 123456csk.am.lodz.pl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6078-2628
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-701X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-1698
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-5737
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-1480
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2845-347X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-8275
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3649-5167
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-5650
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-2554
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2609-575X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-5776
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9090-1253
                Article
                v22i8e18150
                10.2196/18150
                7484771
                32663138
                598b76c3-79fa-4d05-8ea3-eefce471c394
                ©Przemyslaw Kardas, Isabel Aguilar-Palacio, Marta Almada, Caitriona Cahir, Elisio Costa, Anna Giardini, Sara Malo, Mireia Massot Mesquida, Enrica Menditto, Luís Midão, Carlos Luis Parra-Calderón, Enrique Pepiol Salom, Bernard Vrijens. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 27.08.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 8 February 2020
                : 18 March 2020
                : 26 April 2020
                : 22 June 2020
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Viewpoint

                Medicine
                patient adherence,big data,metrics,consensus
                Medicine
                patient adherence, big data, metrics, consensus

                Comments

                Comment on this article