16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ageism Linked to Culture, Not Demographics: Evidence From an 8-Billion-Word Corpus Across 20 Countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Ageism has increased over 200 years and costs the U.S. health care system $63 billion a year. While scholars agree on the consequences of ageism, there are disagreements on whether it is related to the demographics of aging, or society’s cultural values. We test both hypotheses across 20 countries.

          Method

          To circumvent the sampling limitations of survey studies, we used an 8-billion-word corpus, identified 3 synonyms with the highest prevalence—aged, elderly, old people—and compiled the top 300 words (collocates) that were used most frequently with these synonyms for each of the 20 countries. The resulting 6,000 collocates were rated on an ageism scale by 2 raters to create an ageism score per country. Cultural dimension scores—Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Long-term Orientation—were taken from Hofstede, and demographics—size and speed of population aging—came from the World Development Indicators.

          Results

          Of the 20 countries, UK topped the ageism table, while Sri Lanka had the lowest ageism score. Multiple regression models showed that higher levels of masculinity and long-term orientation are associated with ageism, controlling for other cultural dimensions, demographics (size and speed of aging), and economics (GDP-per-capita).

          Discussion

          Our findings blunt the deterministic nature of ageism at the societal level. Demographics is only one side of the ageism coin, and the cultural side is equally, if not more important. This study lays the groundwork to tackle societal ageism—one of our generation’s most pernicious threats.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis.

            Prevailing beliefs suggest that Eastern cultures hold older adults in higher esteem than Western cultures do, due to stronger collectivist traditions of filial piety. However, in modern, industrialized societies, the strain presented by dramatic rises in population aging potentially threatens traditional cultural expectations. Addressing these competing hypotheses, a literature search located 37 eligible papers, comprising samples from 23 countries and 21,093 total participants, directly comparing Easterners and Westerners (as classified per U.N. conventions) in their attitudes toward aging and the aged. Contradicting conventional wisdom, a random-effects meta-analysis on these articles found such evaluations to be more negative in the East overall (standardized mean difference = -0.31). High heterogeneity in study comparisons suggested the presence of moderators; indeed, geographical region emerged as a significant moderating factor, with the strongest levels of senior derogation emerging in East Asia (compared with South and Southeast Asia) and non-Anglophone Europe (compared with North American and Anglophone Western regions). At the country level, multiple-moderator meta-regression analysis confirmed recent rises in population aging to significantly predict negative elder attitudes, controlling for industrialization per se over the same time period. Unexpectedly, these analyses also found that cultural individualism significantly predicted relative positivity-suggesting that, for generating elder respect within rapidly aging societies, collectivist traditions may backfire. The findings suggest the importance of demographic challenges in shaping modern attitudes toward elders-presenting considerations for future research in ageism, cross-cultural psychology, and even economic development, as societies across the globe accommodate unprecedented numbers of older citizens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates.

              College students (N=3,435) in 26 cultures reported their perceptions of age-related changes in physical, cognitive, and socioemotional areas of functioning and rated societal views of aging within their culture. There was widespread cross-cultural consensus regarding the expected direction of aging trajectories with (a) perceived declines in societal views of aging, physical attractiveness, the ability to perform everyday tasks, and new learning; (b) perceived increases in wisdom, knowledge, and received respect; and (c) perceived stability in family authority and life satisfaction. Cross-cultural variations in aging perceptions were associated with culture-level indicators of population aging, education levels, values, and national character stereotypes. These associations were stronger for societal views on aging and perceptions of socioemotional changes than for perceptions of physical and cognitive changes. A consideration of culture-level variables also suggested that previously reported differences in aging perceptions between Asian and Western countries may be related to differences in population structure. PsycINFO Database Record Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Decision Editor
                Journal
                J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci
                J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci
                geronb
                The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1079-5014
                1758-5368
                November 2021
                25 October 2020
                25 October 2020
                : 76
                : 9
                : 1791-1798
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore
                [2 ] Lloyds Register Foundation Institute for the Public Understanding of Risk, National University of Singapore
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Reuben Ng, PhD, Lee Kuan School of Public Policy, Singapore 259772. E-mail: spprng@ 123456nus.edu.sg
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-0570
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-0009
                Article
                gbaa181
                10.1093/geronb/gbaa181
                8557828
                33099600
                5ade90d9-a646-4236-ad9d-a6c37ef2de12
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 April 2020
                : 07 October 2020
                : 30 November 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: National University of Singapore Global Asia Institute NIHA;
                Award ID: NIHA-2018-008
                Funded by: Social Science Research Council, DOI 10.13039/100001345;
                Funded by: SSHR;
                Award ID: MOE2018-SSHR-004
                Funded by: National University of Singapore Lloyds Register Foundation IPUR;
                Award ID: IPUR-FY2019-RES-03-NG
                Categories
                THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Social Sciences
                Societal Framing of Age
                AcademicSubjects/SOC02600
                AcademicSubjects/SCI02100

                Geriatric medicine
                age stereotypes,long-term orientation,masculinity,psychomics,quantitative social science

                Comments

                Comment on this article