5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PET/MRI and PET/CT hybrid imaging of rectal cancer – description and initial observations from the RECTOPET (REctal Cancer trial on PET/MRI/CT) study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The role of hybrid imaging using 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer is largely unknown. To investigate this, the RECTOPET (REctal Cancer Trial on PET/MRI/CT) study has been launched with the aim to assess staging and restaging of primary rectal cancer. This report presents the study workflow and the initial experiences of the impact of PET/CT on staging and management of the first patients included in the RECTOPET study.

          Methods

          This prospective cohort study, initiated in September 2016, is actively recruiting patients from Region Västerbotten in Sweden. This pilot study includes patients recruited and followed up until December 2017. All patients had a biopsy-verified rectal adenocarcinoma and underwent a minimum of one preoperative FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examination. These patients were referred to the colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team meeting at Umeå University Hospital. All available data were evaluated when making management recommendations. The clinical course was noted and changes consequent to PET imaging were described; surgical specimens underwent dedicated MRI for anatomical matching between imaging and histopathology.

          Results

          Twenty-four patients have so far been included in the study. Four patients were deemed unresectable, while 19 patients underwent or were scheduled for surgery; one patient was enrolled in a watch-and-wait programme after restaging. Consequent to taking part in the study, two patients were upstaged to M1 disease: one patient was diagnosed with a solitary hepatic metastasis detected using PET/CT and underwent metastasectomy prior to rectal cancer surgery, while one patient with a small, but metabolically active, lung nodulus experienced no change of management. PET/MRI did not contribute to any recorded change in patient management.

          Conclusions

          The RECTOPET study investigating the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI for preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer patients will provide novel data that clarify the value of adding hybrid to conventional imaging, and the role of PET/CT versus PET/MRI.

          Trial registration

          NCT03846882.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for rectal cancer staging. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of phased array MRI for T category (T1-2 vs. T3-4), lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in primary rectal cancer. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations of keywords relating to rectal cancer and MRI. Reference lists of included articles were also searched by hand. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original article published January 2000-March 2011, (2) use of phased array coil MRI, (3) histopathology used as reference standard, and (4) raw data available to create 2×2 contingency tables. Patients who underwent preoperative long-course radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were estimated for each outcome using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics and bivariate random effects modeling. Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis. There was notable heterogeneity among studies. MRI specificity was significantly higher for CRM involvement [94%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88-97] than for T category (75%, 95% CI 68-80) and lymph nodes (71%, 95% CI 59-81). There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three elements as a result of wide overlapping CIs. Diagnostic odds ratio was significantly higher for CRM (56.1, 95% CI 15.3-205.8) than for lymph nodes (8.3, 95% CI 4.6-14.7) but did not differ significantly from T category (20.4, 95% CI 11.1-37.3). MRI has good accuracy for both CRM and T category and should be considered for preoperative rectal cancer staging. In contrast, lymph node assessment is poor on MRI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lymph Node Negative Colorectal Cancers with Isolated Tumor Deposits Should Be Classified and Treated As Stage III

            Background The prognostic role of pericolic or perirectal isolated tumor deposits (ITDs) in node-negative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is unclear. Rules to define ITDs as regional lymph node metastases changed in subsequent editions of the TNM staging without substantial evidence. Aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between ITDs and disease recurrence in stage II and III CRC patients. Materials and Methods The medical files of 870 CRC patients were reviewed. Number, size, shape, and location pattern of all ITDs in node-negative patients were examined in relation to involvement of vascular structures and nerves. The correlation between ITDs and the development of recurrent disease was investigated. Results Disease recurrence was observed in 50.0% of stage II patients with ITDs (13 of 26), compared with 24.4% of stage II patients without ITDs (66 of 270) (P < .01). Disease-free survival of ITD-positive stage II patients was comparable with that of stage III patients. Also within stage III, more recurrences were observed in ITD-positive patients compared with ITD-negative patients (65.1 vs. 39.1%, respectively). No correlation was found between size of ITDs and disease recurrence. More recurrences were seen in patients with irregularly shaped ITDs compared with patients with 1 or more smooth ITDs present. Conclusions Because of the high risk of disease recurrence, all node-negative stage II patients with ITDs, regardless of size and shape, should be classified as stage III, for whom adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

              The first aim of the review (aim 1) was to obtain the diagnostic performance values of (18)F-FDG PET for the detection and staging of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the second aim (aim 2) was to compare PET and conventional imaging modalities, and the third aim (aim 3) was to evaluate the impact of PET on patient management. The incidence of extrahepatic disease (EHD) detected by PET is also reviewed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +46-(0)90-7850000 , miriam.rutegard@diagrad.umu.se
                malinbatsman@gmail.com
                jan.axelsson@umu.se
                patrik.brynolfsson@umu.se
                fredrikbrannstrom@yahoo.com
                jorgen.rutegard@umu.se
                ingrid.ljuslinder@regionvasterbotten.se
                lennart.k.blomqvist@ki.se
                richard.palmqvist@umu.se
                martin.rutegard@umu.se
                katrine.riklund@umu.se
                Journal
                Cancer Imaging
                Cancer Imaging
                Cancer Imaging
                BioMed Central (London )
                1740-5025
                1470-7330
                23 July 2019
                23 July 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, , Umeå University, ; SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9241 5705, GRID grid.24381.3c, Department of Imaging and Physiology, , Karolinska University Hospital, ; Solna, Sweden
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-2165
                Article
                237
                10.1186/s40644-019-0237-1
                6651930
                31337428
                5ae2d549-437c-42e0-bca1-e0886af39c49
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 March 2019
                : 9 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010794, Medicinska fakulteten, Umeå Universitet;
                Award ID: VLL-757781
                Award ID: VLL-864711
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                rectal neoplasm,rectal tumour,staging,lymph nodes,tumour deposits,pet/ct,fdg-pet/ct,pet/mri,fdg-pet/mri

                Comments

                Comment on this article