22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS

          One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone, and working die of 10 made of scannable stone. Ten three-unit wax frameworks were fabricated by wax-up from Type IV working die. Stereolithography files of 10 three-unit frameworks were obtained using a model scanner and three-dimensional design software on a scannable working die. The three-unit wax framework was fabricated using subtractive manufacturing (SM) by applying the prepared stereolithography file, and the resin framework was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM); both used metal alloy castings for metal frameworks. Marginal and internal gap were measured using silicone replica technique and digital microscope. Measurement data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U-test (α=.05).

          RESULTS

          The lowest and highest gaps between premolar and molar margins were in the SM group and the AM group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap among the 3 groups ( P<.001). In the marginal area where pontic was present, the largest gap was 149.39 ± 42.30 µm in the AM group, and the lowest gap was 24.40 ± 11.92 µm in the SM group.

          CONCLUSION

          Three-unit metal frameworks made by subtractive manufacturing are clinically applicable. However, additive manufacturing requires more research to be applied clinically.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Review of Additive Manufacturing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Considerations in measurement of marginal fit.

            The terminology describing "fit" and the techniques used for measuring fit vary considerably in the literature. Although fit can be most easily defined in terms of "misfit," there are many different locations between a tooth and a restoration where the measurements can be made. In this work, the measurements of misfit at different locations are geometrically related to each other and defined as internal gap, marginal gap, vertical marginal discrepancy, horizontal marginal discrepancy, overextended margin, underextended margin, absolute marginal discrepancy, and seating discrepancy. The significance and difference in magnitude of different locations are presented. The best alternative is perhaps the absolute marginal discrepancy, which would always be the largest measurement of error at the margin and would reflect the total misfit at that point.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study.

              This study sought to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal fit in vitro of three-unit FDPs in Co-Cr made using four fabrication techniques, and to conclude in which area the largest misfit is present. An epoxy resin master model was produced. The impression was first made with silicone, and master and working models were then produced. A total of 32 three-unit Co-Cr FDPs were fabricated with four different production techniques: conventional lost-wax method (LW), milled wax with lost-wax method (MW), milled Co-Cr (MC), and direct laser metal sintering (DLMS). Each of the four groups consisted of eight FDPs (test groups). The FDPs were cemented on their cast and standardised-sectioned. The cement film thickness of the marginal and internal gaps was measured in a stereomicroscope, digital photos were taken at 12× magnification and then analyzed using measurement software. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Best fit based on the means (SDs) in μm for all measurement points was in the DLMS group 84 (60) followed by MW 117 (89), LW 133 (89) and MC 166 (135). Significant differences were present between MC and DLMS (p<0.05). The regression analyses presented differences within the parameters: production technique, tooth size, position and measurement point (p < 0.05). Best fit was found in the DLMS group followed by MW, LW and MC. In all four groups, best fit in both abutments was along the axial walls and in the deepest part of the chamfer preparation. The greatest misfit was present occlusally in all specimens. Copyright © 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Adv Prosthodont
                J Adv Prosthodont
                JAP
                The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
                The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
                2005-7806
                2005-7814
                December 2017
                14 December 2017
                : 9
                : 6
                : 463-469
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
                [2 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School & BK21+ Program in Public Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Woong-Chul Kim. Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea. Tel. +82232905665: kuc2842@ 123456korea.ac.kr
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-4960
                Article
                10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.463
                5741450
                5aeec6dc-65a5-4c3b-9bd7-6f4572a1943e
                © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 January 2017
                : 16 May 2017
                : 29 May 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Korea University, CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002642;
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                cad/cam,micro-stereolithography,metal framework,marginal gap,internal gap
                Dentistry
                cad/cam, micro-stereolithography, metal framework, marginal gap, internal gap

                Comments

                Comment on this article