Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Numerous rationally-designed and directed-evolution variants of SpCas9 have been reported to expand the utility of CRISPR technology. Here, we assess the activity and specificity of WT-Cas9 and 10 SpCas9 variants by benchmarking their PAM preferences, on-target activity, and off-target susceptibility in cell culture assays with thousands of guides targeting endogenous genes. To enhance the coverage and thus utility of base editing screens, we demonstrate that the SpCas9-NG and SpG variants are compatible with both A > G and C > T base editors, more than tripling the number of guides and assayable residues. We demonstrate the performance of these technologies by screening for loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 and Venetoclax-resistant mutations in BCL2, identifying both known and new mutations that alter function. We anticipate that the tools and methodologies described here will facilitate the investigation of genetic variants at a finer and deeper resolution for any locus of interest.

          Abstract

          Numerous rationally-designed and directed-evolution variants of SpCas9 have been reported to expand the utility of CRISPR technology. Here the authors make comparisons of numerous Cas9 variants, nominate options for base editing screens with denser coverage with A>G and C>T base editing screens and identify loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 and Venetoclax-resistant mutations in BCL2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage

          Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction. 1,2 Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks. 1,2 Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9

            CRISPR-Cas9-based genetic screens are a powerful new tool in biology. By simply altering the sequence of the single-guide RNA (sgRNA), Cas9 can be reprogrammed to target different sites in the genome with relative ease, but the on-target activity and off-target effects of individual sgRNAs can vary widely. Here, we use recently-devised sgRNA design rules to create human and mouse genome-wide libraries, perform positive and negative selection screens and observe that the use of these rules produced improved results. Additionally, we profile the off-target activity of thousands of sgRNAs and develop a metric to predict off-target sites. We incorporate these findings from large-scale, empirical data to improve our computational design rules and create optimized sgRNA libraries that maximize on-target activity and minimize off-target effects to enable more effective and efficient genetic screens and genome engineering.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage

              Summary The spontaneous deamination of cytosine is a major source of C•G to T•A transitions, which account for half of known human pathogenic point mutations. The ability to efficiently convert target A•T base pairs to G•C therefore could advance the study and treatment of genetic diseases. While the deamination of adenine yields inosine, which is treated as guanine by polymerases, no enzymes are known to deaminate adenine in DNA. Here we report adenine base editors (ABEs) that mediate conversion of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA. We evolved a tRNA adenosine deaminase to operate on DNA when fused to a catalytically impaired CRISPR-Cas9. Extensive directed evolution and protein engineering resulted in seventh-generation ABEs (e.g., ABE7.10), that convert target A•T to G•C base pairs efficiently (~50% in human cells) with very high product purity (typically ≥ 99.9%) and very low rates of indels (typically ≤ 0.1%). ABEs introduce point mutations more efficiently and cleanly than a current Cas9 nuclease-based method, induce less off-target genome modification than Cas9, and can install disease-correcting or disease-suppressing mutations in human cells. Together with our previous base editors, ABEs advance genome editing by enabling the direct, programmable introduction of all four transition mutations without double-stranded DNA cleavage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jdoench@broadinstitute.org
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                14 March 2022
                14 March 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 1318
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.66859.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0546 1623, Genetic Perturbation Platform, , Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, ; 75 Ames St., Cambridge, MA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-1856
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5552-2939
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2494-5642
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2934-538X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-4633
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-7039
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-9889
                Article
                28884
                10.1038/s41467-022-28884-7
                8921519
                35288574
                5b621f88-dec5-4e69-a604-c10891963955
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 July 2021
                : 18 February 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                functional genomics,cancer genetics,crispr-cas9 genome editing
                Uncategorized
                functional genomics, cancer genetics, crispr-cas9 genome editing

                Comments

                Comment on this article