1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Alliance A071401: Phase II Trial of Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Meningiomas With Somatic NF2 Mutations

      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 3 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 29 , 1 , 3
      Journal of Clinical Oncology
      American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Patients with progressive or recurrent meningiomas have limited systemic therapy options. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibition has a synthetic lethal relationship with NF2 loss. Given the predominance of NF2 mutations in meningiomas, we evaluated the efficacy of GSK2256098, a FAK inhibitor, as part of the first genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive grade 1-3 meningiomas.

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          Eligible patients whose tumors screened positively for NF2 mutations were treated with GSK2256098, 750 mg orally twice daily, until progressive disease. Efficacy was evaluated using two coprimary end points: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate by Macdonald criteria, where PFS6 was evaluated separately within grade-based subgroups: grade 1 versus 2/3 meningiomas. Per study design, the FAK inhibitor would be considered promising in this patient population if either end point met the corresponding decision criteria for efficacy.

          RESULTS

          Of 322 patients screened for all mutation cohorts of the study, 36 eligible and evaluable patients with NF2 mutations were enrolled and treated: 12 grade 1 and 24 grade 2/3 patients. Across all grades, one patient had a partial response and 24 had stable disease as their best response to treatment. In grade 1 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 83% (10/12 patients; 95% CI, 52 to 98). In grade 2/3 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 33% (8/24 patients; 95% CI, 16 to 55). The study met the PFS6 efficacy end point both for the grade 1 and the grade 2/3 cohorts. Treatment was well tolerated; seven patients had a maximum grade 3 adverse event that was at least possibly related to treatment with no grade 4 or 5 events.

          CONCLUSION

          GSK2256098 was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6 rate in patients with recurrent or progressive NF2-mutated meningiomas, compared with historical controls. The criteria for promising activity were met, and FAK inhibition warrants further evaluation for this patient population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

          Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) projects, such as the 1000 Genomes Project, are already revolutionizing our understanding of genetic variation among individuals. However, the massive data sets generated by NGS--the 1000 Genome pilot alone includes nearly five terabases--make writing feature-rich, efficient, and robust analysis tools difficult for even computationally sophisticated individuals. Indeed, many professionals are limited in the scope and the ease with which they can answer scientific questions by the complexity of accessing and manipulating the data produced by these machines. Here, we discuss our Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), a structured programming framework designed to ease the development of efficient and robust analysis tools for next-generation DNA sequencers using the functional programming philosophy of MapReduce. The GATK provides a small but rich set of data access patterns that encompass the majority of analysis tool needs. Separating specific analysis calculations from common data management infrastructure enables us to optimize the GATK framework for correctness, stability, and CPU and memory efficiency and to enable distributed and shared memory parallelization. We highlight the capabilities of the GATK by describing the implementation and application of robust, scale-tolerant tools like coverage calculators and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling. We conclude that the GATK programming framework enables developers and analysts to quickly and easily write efficient and robust NGS tools, many of which have already been incorporated into large-scale sequencing projects like the 1000 Genomes Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data

            Recent advances in sequencing technology make it possible to comprehensively catalogue genetic variation in population samples, creating a foundation for understanding human disease, ancestry and evolution. The amounts of raw data produced are prodigious and many computational steps are required to translate this output into high-quality variant calls. We present a unified analytic framework to discover and genotype variation among multiple samples simultaneously that achieves sensitive and specific results across five sequencing technologies and three distinct, canonical experimental designs. Our process includes (1) initial read mapping; (2) local realignment around indels; (3) base quality score recalibration; (4) SNP discovery and genotyping to find all potential variants; and (5) machine learning to separate true segregating variation from machine artifacts common to next-generation sequencing technologies. We discuss the application of these tools, instantiated in the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), to deep whole-genome, whole-exome capture, and multi-sample low-pass (~4×) 1000 Genomes Project datasets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline.

              This unit describes how to use BWA and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) to map genome sequencing data to a reference and produce high-quality variant calls that can be used in downstream analyses. The complete workflow includes the core NGS data processing steps that are necessary to make the raw data suitable for analysis by the GATK, as well as the key methods involved in variant discovery using the GATK.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                January 20 2023
                January 20 2023
                : 41
                : 3
                : 618-628
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                [2 ]Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
                [3 ]Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
                [4 ]Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
                [5 ]UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
                [6 ]University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
                [7 ]University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
                [8 ]University of California, San Francisco Brain Tumor Center, San Francisco, CA
                [9 ]Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital/Baptist Hospital South Florida, Boca Raton, FL
                [10 ]Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
                [11 ]Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
                [12 ]University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL
                [13 ]University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
                [14 ]University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
                [15 ]University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
                [16 ]University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
                [17 ]Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
                [18 ]University of Cincinnati, West Chester, OH
                [19 ]Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC, Tacoma, WA
                [20 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
                [21 ]Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest, Allentown, PA
                [22 ]University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
                [23 ]Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
                [24 ]University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
                [25 ]Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia
                [26 ]The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
                [27 ]College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
                [28 ]Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
                [29 ]Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.21.02371
                36288512
                5bc5c730-0358-42c7-a88a-ac4bfa79e7f8
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article