11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Anti-C1s monoclonal antibody BIVV009 in late antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection-results from a first-in-patient phase 1 trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The classical pathway (CP) of complement may contribute to the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Selective CP blockade may be a promising strategy to counteract rejection. The objective of this first-in-patient phase 1b trial was to evaluate the safety/tolerability and CP-blocking potential of 4 weekly doses (60 mg/kg) of the anti-C1s antibody BIVV009 in complement-mediated disorders. Here we describe the results in a cohort of 10 stable kidney transplant recipients (median of 4.3 years posttransplantation) with late active ABMR and features of CP activation, such as capillary C4d or complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). During 7 weeks follow-up, no severe adverse events were reported, and BIVV009 profoundly inhibited overall and DSA-triggered CP activation in serum. Five of 8 C4d-positive recipients turned C4d-negative in 5-week follow-up biopsies, while another 2 recipients showed a substantial decrease in C4d scores. There was, however, no change in microcirculation inflammation, gene expression patterns, DSA levels, or kidney function. In conclusion, we demonstrate that BIVV009 effectively blocks alloantibody-triggered CP activation, even though short-course treatment had no effect on indices of activity in late ABMR. This initial trial provides a valuable basis for future studies designed to clarify the therapeutic value of CP blockade in transplantation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#02502903.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The molecular landscape of antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection: evidence for NK involvement through CD16a Fc receptors.

          The recent recognition that antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the major cause of kidney transplant loss creates strong interest in its pathogenesis. We used microarray analysis of kidney transplant biopsies to identify the changes in pure ABMR. We found that the ABMR transcript changes in the initial Discovery Set were strongly conserved in a subsequent Validation Set. In the Combined Set of 703 biopsies, 2603 transcripts were significantly changed (FDR < 0.05) in ABMR versus all other biopsies. In cultured cells, the transcripts strongly associated with ABMR were expressed in endothelial cells, e.g. cadherins CDH5 and CDH13; IFNG-treated endothelial cells, e.g. phospholipase PLA1A and chemokine CXCL11; or NK cells, e.g. cytotoxicity molecules granulysin (GNLY) and FGFBP2. Other ABMR transcripts were expressed in normal kidney but not cell lines, either increased e.g. Duffy chemokine receptor (DARC) or decreased e.g. sclerostin (SOST). Pathway analysis of ABMR transcripts identified angiogenesis, with roles for angiopoietin and vascular endothelial growth factors; leukocyte-endothelial interactions; and NK signaling, including evidence for CD16a Fc receptor signaling elements shared with T cells. These data support a model of ABMR involving injury-repair in the microcirculation induced by cognate recognition involving antibody and CD16a, triggering IFNG release and antibody-dependent NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing rejection-related disease in kidney transplant biopsies based on archetypal analysis of molecular phenotypes

            Conventional histologic diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplants has limited repeatability due to its inherent requirement for subjective assessment of lesions, in a rule-based system that does not acknowledge diagnostic uncertainty. Molecular phenotyping affords opportunities for increased precision and improved disease classification to address the limitations of conventional histologic diagnostic systems and quantify levels of uncertainty. Microarray data from 1,208 kidney transplant biopsies were collected prospectively from 13 centers. Cross-validated classifier scores predicting the presence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR), and 5 related histologic lesions were generated using supervised machine learning methods. These scores were used as input for archetypal analysis, an unsupervised method similar to cluster analysis, to examine the distribution of molecular phenotypes related to rejection. Six archetypes were generated: no rejection, TCMR, 3 associated with ABMR (early-stage, fully developed, and late-stage), and mixed rejection (TCMR plus early-stage ABMR). Each biopsy was assigned 6 scores, one for each archetype, representing a probabilistic assessment of that biopsy based on its rejection-related molecular properties. Viewed as clusters, the archetypes were similar to existing histologic Banff categories, but there was 32% disagreement, much of it probably reflecting the “noise” in the current histologic assessment system. Graft survival was lowest for fully developed and late-stage ABMR, and it was better predicted by molecular archetype scores than histologic diagnoses. The results provide a system for precision molecular assessment of biopsies and a new standard for recalibrating conventional diagnostic systems. A combination of supervised and unsupervised analyses of microarray data were used to assess rejection in kidney transplants as an alternative to conventional histology approaches.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Positive crossmatch kidney transplant recipients treated with eculizumab: outcomes beyond 1 year.

              This study examined outcomes beyond 1 year in eculizumab-treated (EC) positive crossmatch kidney transplants (+XMKTx) compared to a historical control group. +XMKTx received desensitization with either plasma exchange (PE) alone (N = 48) or PE and EC (N = 30). EC, given for at least 1 month, was continued in the setting of persistently high DSA (B flow cytometric crossmatch [BFXM] >200) including: 4 weeks (n = 14); 9 weeks (n = 6), 6 months (n = 2), and 12 months (n = 8). All patients had at least 2 years follow-up. The incidence of acute clinical ABMR was lower in the EC group than controls (6.7% vs. 43.8% p  0, 26.7% versus 31.9% (p = 0.62), ptc score ≥ 2, 60.0% versus 60.0% (p = 1.00), or C4d + , 33.8% versus 13.5% (p = 0.08). A persistently high BFXM in EC-treated patients was associated with cg score >0 at 1 year, while EC appeared to protect against cg if the BFXM remained low. We conclude that despite decreasing acute clinical ABMR rates, EC treatment does not prevent chronic ABMR in recipients with persistently high BFXM after +XMKTx.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Transplantation
                Am J Transplant
                Wiley
                16006135
                April 2018
                April 2018
                October 31 2017
                : 18
                : 4
                : 916-926
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology and Dialysis; Department of Medicine III; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
                [3 ]Department of Surgery; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
                [4 ]Department of Pathology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
                [5 ]Bioverativ Therapeutics, Inc; South San Francisco CA USA
                [6 ]True North Therapeutics, Inc; South San Francisco CA USA
                [7 ]Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; ATAGC; University of Alberta; Edmonton AB Canada
                Article
                10.1111/ajt.14528
                28980446
                5c9dae3c-1182-422f-9a31-dd23a4a5878c
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article