4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Severe illness getting noticed sooner – SIGNS-for-Kids: developing an illness recognition tool to connect home and hospital

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Delays to definitive treatment for time-sensitive acute paediatric illnesses continue to be a cause of death and disability in the Canadian healthcare system. Our aim was to develop the SIGNS-for-Kids illness recognition tool to empower parents and other community caregivers to recognise the signs and symptoms of severe illness in infants and children. The goal of the tool is improved detection and reduced time to treatment of acute conditions that require emergent medical attention.

          Methods

          A single-day consensus workshop consisting of a 17-member panel of parents and multidisciplinary healthcare experts with content expertise and/or experience managing children with severe acute illnesses was held. An a priori agreement of ≥85% was planned for the final iteration SIGNS-for-Kids tool elements by the end of the workshop.

          Results

          One hundred percent consensus was achieved on a five-item tool distilled from 20 initial items at the beginning of the consensus workshop. The final items included four child-based items consisting of: (1) behaviour, (2) breathing, (3) skin, and (4) fluids, and one context-based item and (5) response to rescue treatments.

          Conclusions

          Specific cues of urgent child illness were identified as part of this initial development phase. These cues were integrated into a comprehensive tool designed for parents and other lay caregivers to recognise the signs of serious acute illness and initiate medical attention in an undifferentiated population of infants and children. Future validation and optimisation of the tool are planned.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams.

          Studies have established that physiologic instability and services mismatching precede adverse events in hospitalized patients. In response to these considerations, the concept of a Rapid Response System (RRS) has emerged. The responding team is commonly known as a medical emergency team (MET), rapid response team (RRT), or critical care outreach (CCO). Studies show that an RRS may improve outcome, but questions remain regarding the benefit, design elements, and advisability of implementing a MET system. In June 2005 an International Conference on Medical Emergency Teams (ICMET) included experts in patient safety, hospital medicine, critical care medicine, and METs. Seven of 25 had no experience with an RRS, and the remainder had experience with one of the three major forms of RRS. After preconference telephone and e-mail conversations by the panelists in which questions to be discussed were characterized, literature reviewed, and preliminary answers created, the panelists convened for 2 days to create a consensus document. Four major content areas were addressed: What is a MET response? Is there a MET syndrome? What are barriers to METS? How should outcome be measured? Panelists considered whether all hospitals should implement an RRS. Patients needing an RRS intervention are suddenly critically ill and have a mismatch of resources to needs. Hospitals should implement an RRS, which consists of four elements: an afferent, "crisis detection" and "response triggering" mechanism; an efferent, predetermined rapid response team; a governance/administrative structure to supply and organize resources; and a mechanism to evaluate crisis antecedents and promote hospital process improvement to prevent future events.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?

            Qualitative methods are increasingly recognized as valuable, yet practitioners face difficult decisions in their choice of method and the process of analysis. The nominal group technique combines quantitative and qualitative data collection in a group setting, and avoids problems of group dynamics associated with other group methods such as brainstorming, Delphi and focus groups. Idea generation and problem solving are combined in a structured group process, which encourages and enhances the participation of group members. The stages involved in conducting a nominal group are described, and practical problems of its use in a health care setting are discussed with reference to a study of the priorities of care of diabetic patients, carers and health professionals. Some potential applications of the technique in audit and exploratory research are also outlined.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical report from the pilot USA Kernicterus Registry (1992 to 2004).

              To identify antecedent clinical and health services events in infants (>/=35 weeks gestational age (GA)) who were discharged as healthy from their place of birth and subsequently sustained kernicterus. We conducted a root-cause analysis of a convenience sample of 125 infants >/=35 weeks GA cared for in US healthcare facilities (including off-shore US military bases). These cases were voluntarily reported to the Pilot USA Kernicterus Registry (1992 to 2004) and met the eligibility criteria of acute bilirubin encephalopathy (ABE) and/or post-icteric sequelae. Multiple providers at multiple sites managed this cohort of infants for their newborn jaundice and progressive hyperbilirubinemia. Clinical signs of ABE, verbalized by parents, were often inadequately elicited or recorded and often not recognized as an emergency. Clinical signs of ABE were reported in 7 of 125 infants with a subsequent diagnosis of kernicterus who were not re-evaluated or treated for hyperbilirubinemia, although jaundice was noted at outpatient visits. The remaining infants (n=118) had total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels >20 mg per 100 ml (342 micromol l(-1); range: 20.7 to 59.9 mg per 100 ml). No specific TSB threshold coincided with onset of ABE. Of infants 37 weeks GA). Although >90% mothers initiated breast-feeding, assessment of milk transfer and lactation support was suboptimal in most. Mortality was 4% (5 of 125) in infants readmitted at age 0.2 mg per 100 ml per hour), contributing factors, alone or in combination, included undiagnosed hemolytic disease, excessive bilirubin production related to extra-vascular hemolysis and delayed bilirubin elimination (including increased enterohepatic circulation, diagnosed and undiagnosed genetic disorders) in the context of known late prematurity ( 35 mg per 100 ml had post-icteric sequelae (n=73). There was a narrow margin of safety between birthing hospital discharge or home birth and readmission to a tertiary neonatal/pediatric facility. Progression of hyperbilirubinemia to hazardous levels and onset of neurological signs were often not identified as infant's care and medical supervision transitioned during the first week after birth. The major underlying root cause for kernicterus was systems failure of services by multiple providers at multiple sites and inability to identify the at-risk infant and manage severe hyperbilirubinemia in a timely manner.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open Qual
                BMJ Open Qual
                bmjqir
                bmjoq
                BMJ Open Quality
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2399-6641
                2019
                27 November 2019
                : 8
                : 4
                : e000763
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine , Alberta Children’s Hospital , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine , Georgian Bay General Hospital , Midland, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]departmentChildren’s Health Division , Trillium Health Partners , Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Paediatrics , University of Toronto , Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Critical Care Medicine , Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]departmentPatient and Family Centered Care , Stollery Children’s Hospital , Edmonton, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine , Orillia Soldiers Memorial Hospital , Orillia, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatrics , Hospital Medicine Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [10 ]departmentAcute Care Transport Services (ACTS) , Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [11 ]departmentSickKids Foundation , Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [12 ]departmentNurse Practitioner Clinic , Georgian Bay General Hospital , Midland, Ontario, Canada
                [13 ]departmentPaediatric Critical Care Medicine , Center for Safety Research, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [14 ]departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Newborn Care , Ottawa Hospital General Campus , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [15 ]departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [16 ]departmentNEO Kids and Family Program , Health Sciences North , Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
                [17 ]departmentHealthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada , Lead Clinical Risk, Healthcare Safety and Risk Management , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [18 ]departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [19 ]Canadian Patient Safety Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [20 ]departmentPediatrics, Critical Care, Health Policy, Management & Evaluation , University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Jonathan Gilleland; jonathan.gilleland@ 123456ahs.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-2881
                Article
                bmjoq-2019-000763
                10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000763
                6887512
                5ce7a182-4d50-4fe6-955e-77cb5f7ca32b
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 July 2019
                : 09 October 2019
                : 01 November 2019
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                pediatrics,parents,assessment,early warning system,healthcare delivery,access to care

                Comments

                Comment on this article