4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of long-term organic farming on soil-derived greenhouse gas emissions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Agricultural practices contribute considerably to emissions of greenhouse gases. So far, knowledge on the impact of organic compared to non-organic farming on soil-derived nitrous oxide (N 2O) and methane (CH 4) emissions is limited. We investigated N 2O and CH 4 fluxes with manual chambers during 571 days in a grass-clover– silage maize – green manure cropping sequence in the long-term field trial “DOK” in Switzerland. We compared two organic farming systems – biodynamic (BIODYN) and bioorganic (BIOORG) – with two non-organic systems – solely mineral fertilisation (CONMIN) and mixed farming including farmyard manure (CONFYM) – all reflecting Swiss farming practices–together with an unfertilised control (NOFERT). We observed a 40.2% reduction of N 2O emissions per hectare for organic compared to non-organic systems. In contrast to current knowledge, yield-scaled cumulated N 2O emissions under silage maize were similar between organic and non-organic systems. Cumulated on area scale we recorded under silage maize a modest CH 4 uptake for BIODYN and CONMIN and high CH 4 emissions for CONFYM. We found that, in addition to N input, quality properties such as pH, soil organic carbon and microbial biomass significantly affected N 2O emissions. This study showed that organic farming systems can be a viable measure contributing to greenhouse gas mitigation in the agricultural sector.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming.

          An understanding of agroecosystems is key to determining effective farming systems. Here we report results from a 21-year study of agronomic and ecological performance of biodynamic, bioorganic, and conventional farming systems in Central Europe. We found crop yields to be 20% lower in the organic systems, although input of fertilizer and energy was reduced by 34 to 53% and pesticide input by 97%. Enhanced soil fertility and higher biodiversity found in organic plots may render these systems less dependent on external inputs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture.

            Numerous reports have emphasized the need for major changes in the global food system: agriculture must meet the twin challenge of feeding a growing population, with rising demand for meat and high-calorie diets, while simultaneously minimizing its global environmental impacts. Organic farming—a system aimed at producing food with minimal harm to ecosystems, animals or humans—is often proposed as a solution. However, critics argue that organic agriculture may have lower yields and would therefore need more land to produce the same amount of food as conventional farms, resulting in more widespread deforestation and biodiversity loss, and thus undermining the environmental benefits of organic practices. Here we use a comprehensive meta-analysis to examine the relative yield performance of organic and conventional farming systems globally. Our analysis of available data shows that, overall, organic yields are typically lower than conventional yields. But these yield differences are highly contextual, depending on system and site characteristics, and range from 5% lower organic yields (rain-fed legumes and perennials on weak-acidic to weak-alkaline soils), 13% lower yields (when best organic practices are used), to 34% lower yields (when the conventional and organic systems are most comparable). Under certain conditions—that is, with good management practices, particular crop types and growing conditions—organic systems can thus nearly match conventional yields, whereas under others it at present cannot. To establish organic agriculture as an important tool in sustainable food production, the factors limiting organic yields need to be more fully understood, alongside assessments of the many social, environmental and economic benefits of organic farming systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century.

              Organic agriculture has a history of being contentious and is considered by some as an inefficient approach to food production. Yet organic foods and beverages are a rapidly growing market segment in the global food industry. Here, we examine the performance of organic farming in light of four key sustainability metrics: productivity, environmental impact, economic viability and social wellbeing. Organic farming systems produce lower yields compared with conventional agriculture. However, they are more profitable and environmentally friendly, and deliver equally or more nutritious foods that contain less (or no) pesticide residues, compared with conventional farming. Moreover, initial evidence indicates that organic agricultural systems deliver greater ecosystem services and social benefits. Although organic agriculture has an untapped role to play when it comes to the establishment of sustainable farming systems, no single approach will safely feed the planet. Rather, a blend of organic and other innovative farming systems is needed. Significant barriers exist to adopting these systems, however, and a diversity of policy instruments will be required to facilitate their development and implementation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                andreas.gattinger@agrar.uni-giessen.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 February 2019
                8 February 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 1702
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0511 762X, GRID grid.424520.5, Department of Soil Sciences, , Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, ; CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2165 8627, GRID grid.8664.c, Organic Farming with focus on Sustainable Soil Use, , Institute of Crop Science and Breeding II, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, ; 35394 Giessen, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4681 910X, GRID grid.417771.3, Water Protection and Substance Flows, , Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, ; CH 8046 Zürich, Switzerland
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4681 910X, GRID grid.417771.3, Plant Soil Interactions, , Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, ; CH 8046 Zürich, Switzerland
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, GRID grid.7400.3, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, , University of Zürich, ; CH 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000120346234, GRID grid.5477.1, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Science, , Utrecht University, ; 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-6460
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-1176
                Article
                38207
                10.1038/s41598-018-38207-w
                6368562
                30737429
                5ce9c640-7773-47ff-936c-bb83ac08b5a2
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 August 2018
                : 19 December 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article