7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of a stroke-specific follow-up care model on the quality of life of stroke patients and caregivers: A controlled trial.

      Journal of rehabilitation medicine
      Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Caregivers, psychology, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Quality of Life, Social Participation, Stroke, rehabilitation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate the effectiveness of a stroke-specific follow-up care model on quality of life for stroke patients, being discharged home, and their caregivers. A non-randomized, controlled trial, comparing an intervention group with a control group (usual care). Stroke patients and their caregivers. Intervention involved 5 home visits by a stroke care coordinator over a period of 18 months, using a structured assessment tool. Outcome measures were conducted at baseline (T0) and every 6 months thereafter (T6, T12 and T18) in the domains of quality of life (primary), activities of daily living, social activities, depression, anxiety and caregiver strain. The intervention group (n = 62) had significantly increased its social activities after 18 months, whereas the control group (n = 55) showed significantly decreased levels of social activities. In the first 6 months, levels of depression decreased significantly in caregivers of the intervention group. No differences were found for quality of life and the other outcome measures. The intervention was not effective in improving quality of life, but was effective in improving levels of social activities. The intervention may have focussed too much on screening for stroke-related problems and not as much on adequate follow-up care and referral.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article