0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PfSPZ-CVac efficacy against malaria increases from 0% to 75% when administered in the absence of erythrocyte stage parasitemia: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with controlled human malaria infection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PfSPZ-CVac combines ‘PfSPZ Challenge’, which consists of infectious Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ), with concurrent antimalarial chemoprophylaxis. In a previously-published PfSPZ-CVac study, three doses of 5.12x10 4 PfSPZ-CVac given 28 days apart had 100% vaccine efficacy (VE) against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) 10 weeks after the last immunization, while the same dose given as three injections five days apart had 63% VE. Here, we conducted a dose escalation trial of similarly condensed schedules. Of the groups proceeding to CHMI, the first study group received three direct venous inoculations (DVIs) of a dose of 5.12x10 4 PfSPZ-CVac seven days apart and the next full dose group received three DVIs of a higher dose of 1.024x10 5 PfSPZ-CVac five days apart. CHMI (3.2x10 3 PfSPZ Challenge) was performed by DVI 10 weeks after the last vaccination. In both CHMI groups, transient parasitemia occurred starting seven days after each vaccination. For the seven-day interval group, the second and third vaccinations were therefore administered coincident with parasitemia from the prior vaccination. Parasitemia was associated with systemic symptoms which were severe in 25% of subjects. VE in the seven-day group was 0% (7/7 infected) and in the higher-dose, five-day group was 75% (2/8 infected). Thus, the same dose of PfSPZ-CVac previously associated with 63% VE when given on a five-day schedule in the prior study had zero VE here when given on a seven-day schedule, while a double dose given on a five-day schedule here achieved 75% VE. The relative contributions of the five-day schedule and/or the higher dose to improved VE warrant further investigation. It is notable that administration of PfSPZ-CVac on a schedule where vaccine administration coincided with blood-stage parasitemia was associated with an absence of sterile protective immunity.

          Clinical trials registration: NCT02773979.

          Author summary

          The world needs a protective malaria vaccine. One approach is to repeatedly administer whole sporozoites, the parasite form that is transmitted from mosquitos to humans. Without treatment, sporozoites enter the liver, grow for a week, and then infect red blood cells, causing clinical disease. Here, we gave a vaccine consisting of sporozoites with a drug that prevents red blood cell infections to eliminate clinical illness. This approach was protective in other studies so we initially evaluated a faster schedule where the vaccine was given weekly. Surprisingly, there was no protection observed. We determined that weekly intervals led the second and third vaccine doses to be administered just as the previous dose of sporozoites was transitioning from the liver to the blood stage. Even though blood stage infection was stopped in this study by the co-administered drug (chloroquine), we hypothesized that it was problematic to administer a vaccine during blood stage infection. Therefore, we gave the vaccinations every five days so that upon the second and third doses, there were no blood-stage parasites present. With five-day spacing and a higher dose, the vaccine protected 75% of participants. These findings suggest that blood-stage infections may hinder formation of protective responses to malaria.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Protection against a malaria challenge by sporozoite inoculation.

          An effective vaccine for malaria is urgently needed. Naturally acquired immunity to malaria develops slowly, and induction of protection in humans can be achieved artificially by the inoculation of radiation-attenuated sporozoites by means of more than 1000 infective mosquito bites. We exposed 15 healthy volunteers--with 10 assigned to a vaccine group and 5 assigned to a control group--to bites of mosquitoes once a month for 3 months while they were receiving a prophylactic regimen of chloroquine. The vaccine group was exposed to mosquitoes that were infected with Plasmodium falciparum, and the control group was exposed to mosquitoes that were not infected with the malaria parasite. One month after the discontinuation of chloroquine, protection was assessed by homologous challenge with five mosquitoes infected with P. falciparum. We assessed humoral and cellular responses before vaccination and before the challenge to investigate correlates of protection. All 10 subjects in the vaccine group were protected against a malaria challenge with the infected mosquitoes. In contrast, patent parasitemia (i.e., parasites found in the blood on microscopical examination) developed in all five control subjects. Adverse events were mainly reported by vaccinees after the first immunization and by control subjects after the challenge; no serious adverse events occurred. In this model, we identified the induction of parasite-specific pluripotent effector memory T cells producing interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-2 as a promising immunologic marker of protection. Protection against a homologous malaria challenge can be induced by the inoculation of intact sporozoites. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00442377.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Live attenuated malaria vaccine designed to protect through hepatic CD8⁺ T cell immunity.

            Our goal is to develop a vaccine that sustainably prevents Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria in ≥80% of recipients. Pf sporozoites (PfSPZ) administered by mosquito bites are the only immunogens shown to induce such protection in humans. Such protection is thought to be mediated by CD8(+) T cells in the liver that secrete interferon-γ (IFN-γ). We report that purified irradiated PfSPZ administered to 80 volunteers by needle inoculation in the skin was safe, but suboptimally immunogenic and protective. Animal studies demonstrated that intravenous immunization was critical for inducing a high frequency of PfSPZ-specific CD8(+), IFN-γ-producing T cells in the liver (nonhuman primates, mice) and conferring protection (mice). Our results suggest that intravenous administration of this vaccine will lead to the prevention of infection with Pf malaria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sterile protection against human malaria by chemoattenuated PfSPZ vaccine

              A highly protective malaria vaccine would greatly facilitate the prevention and elimination of malaria and containment of drug-resistant parasites. A high level (more than 90%) of protection against malaria in humans has previously been achieved only by immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoites (PfSPZ) inoculated by mosquitoes; by intravenous injection of aseptic, purified, radiation-attenuated, cryopreserved PfSPZ (‘PfSPZ Vaccine’); or by infectious PfSPZ inoculated by mosquitoes to volunteers taking chloroquine or mefloquine (chemoprophylaxis with sporozoites). We assessed immunization by direct venous inoculation of aseptic, purified, cryopreserved, non-irradiated PfSPZ (‘PfSPZ Challenge’) to malaria-naive, healthy adult volunteers taking chloroquine for antimalarial chemoprophylaxis (vaccine approach denoted as PfSPZ-CVac). Three doses of 5.12 × 104 PfSPZ of PfSPZ Challenge at 28-day intervals were well tolerated and safe, and prevented infection in 9 out of 9 (100%) volunteers who underwent controlled human malaria infection ten weeks after the last dose (group III). Protective efficacy was dependent on dose and regimen. Immunization with 3.2 × 103 (group I) or 1.28 × 104 (group II) PfSPZ protected 3 out of 9 (33%) or 6 out of 9 (67%) volunteers, respectively. Three doses of 5.12 × 104 PfSPZ at five-day intervals protected 5 out of 8 (63%) volunteers. The frequency of Pf-specific polyfunctional CD4 memory T cells was associated with protection. On a 7,455 peptide Pf proteome array, immune sera from at least 5 out of 9 group III vaccinees recognized each of 22 proteins. PfSPZ-CVac is a highly efficacious vaccine candidate; when we are able to optimize the immunization regimen (dose, interval between doses, and drug partner), this vaccine could be used for combination mass drug administration and a mass vaccination program approach to eliminate malaria from geographically defined areas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                28 May 2021
                May 2021
                : 17
                : 5
                : e1009594
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Seattle Malaria Clinical Trials Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [4 ] Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [5 ] Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
                [6 ] Sanaria Inc., Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
                [7 ] The Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
                [8 ] Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [9 ] Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                University of South Florida, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: SCM, SG, JKK, KWC, JGK and LAJ report no relevant conflicts of interest. GAD is employed by NIH (trial sponsor). BKLS, YA, NKC, SC, ERJ, SLH, and TLR are full time employees of Sanaria Inc. which is developing vaccines against malaria based on whole sporozoites, including PfSPZ-CVac and PfSPZ Vaccine. There are no patent applications or issued patents pertaining to the results presented herein.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-0131
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-4541
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-5789
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-9941
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-745X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-3741
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-5456
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1785-0218
                Article
                PPATHOGENS-D-21-00269
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1009594
                8191919
                34048504
                5d86d1e5-2d2b-436b-8a06-ad28cf65695b

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 3 February 2021
                : 29 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 23
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: HHSN272201300019I
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: 2R44AI058375-11
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by contract HHSN272201300019I from the National Institutes of Health www.niaid.nih.gov to LAJ. Sanaria provided PfSPZ Challenge for the study with support from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health SBIR grant 2R44AI058375-11 to SLH. NIH/NIAID and Sanaria participated in design of the clinical trial, analysis/review of the data, and review/editing of the manuscript through the VTEU's clinical trial process.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Preventive Medicine
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Parasitology
                Quantitative Parasitology
                Parasitemia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Parasitic Diseases
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Vaccine Development
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Vaccine Development
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Preventive Medicine
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Vaccine Development
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Immunologic Techniques
                Immunoassays
                Enzyme-Linked Immunoassays
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Infectious Disease Control
                Vaccines
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Blood Cells
                White Blood Cells
                T Cells
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                T Cells
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                T Cells
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                T Cells
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Parasitology
                Parasite Groups
                Apicomplexa
                Sporozoites
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2021-06-10
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article