10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Comparison of the Effects of Benzalkonium Chloride on Ocular Surfaces between C57BL/6 and BALB/c Mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Models of benzalkonium chloride (BAC)-induced ocular disruption have been created and are widely used in various animals. This study aimed to compare the effects of BAC on the ocular surfaces of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were treated separately with BAC eye-drops at different concentrations. Eyes were evaluated by scoring epithelial disruption, corneal opacity and neovascularization in vivo, and by histological assays with hematoxylin/eosin (H/E) and periodic acid-Schiff stainings and by determining the expression of inflammatory factors in vitro on Days 7 and 14. The in vivo corneal epithelial disruption, corneal edema/opacity and neovascularization, which were in accordance with the results of the H/E staining and peaked at Day 7, were observed in a dose-dependent manner in the BAC-treated mice, with more severe signs in the C57BL/6 mice than the BALB/c mice. The loss of conjunctival goblet cells in the conjunctivas and the increasing expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), growth-regulated protein alpha (GROa) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a) in the corneas were found in a dose-dependent manner in both strains of mice. Topical application of BAC can dramatically disrupt the ocular surfaces of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, and the disruptions were much more severe in the C57BL/6 mice that received high doses of BAC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly.

          There is a large body of evidence from experimental and clinical studies showing that the long-term use of topical drugs may induce ocular surface changes, causing ocular discomfort, tear film instability, conjunctival inflammation, subconjunctival fibrosis, epithelial apoptosis, corneal surface impairment, and the potential risk of failure for further glaucoma surgery. Subclinical inflammation has also been described in patients receiving antiglaucoma treatments for long periods of time. However, the mechanisms involved, i.e., allergic, toxic, or inflammatory, as well as the respective roles of the active compound and the preservative in inducing the toxic and/or proinflammatory effects of ophthalmic solutions, is still being debated. The most frequently used preservative, benzalkonium chloride (BAK), has consistently demonstrated its toxic effects in laboratory, experimental, and clinical studies. As a quaternary ammonium, this compound has been shown to cause tear film instability, loss of goblet cells, conjunctival squamous metaplasia and apoptosis, disruption of the corneal epithelium barrier, and damage to deeper ocular tissues. The mechanisms causing these effects have not been fully elucidated, although the involvement of immunoinflammatory reactions with the release of proinflammatory cytokines, apoptosis, oxidative stress, as well as direct interactions with the lipid components of the tear film and cell membranes have been well established. Preservative-induced adverse effects are therefore far from being restricted to only allergic reactions, and side effects are often very difficult to identify because they mostly occur in a delayed or poorly specific manner. Care should therefore be taken to avoid the long-term use of preservatives, otherwise a less toxic alternative to BAK should be developed, as this weakly allergenic but highly toxic compound exerts dose- and time-dependent effects. On the basis of all these experimental and clinical reports, it would be advisable to use benzalkonium-free solutions whenever possible, especially in patients with the greatest exposure to high doses or prolonged treatments, in those suffering from preexisting or concomitant ocular surface diseases, and those experiencing side effects related to the ocular surface. Indeed, mild symptoms should not be underestimated, neglected, or denied, because they may very well be the apparent manifestations of more severe, potentially threatening subclinical reactions that may later cause major concerns. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conjunctival proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol: an ex vivo and in vitro study.

            To compare the toxicity of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol on conjunctival cells. Expression of inflammatory markers and MUC5AC-related mucin production were evaluated by impression cytology in a case-control ex vivo study. The proapoptotic effect of the same drugs was also evaluated in vitro in a conjunctival cell line and compared with that of benzalkonium chloride (BAC). Impression cytology (IC) specimens were obtained from a series of normal subjects and from patients with glaucoma treated for at least 1 year with latanoprost eye drops or preserved or unpreserved timolol. All groups were comparable in age and duration of treatment. Expression of HLA-DR, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and mucin was evaluated in a masked manner by flow cytometry. For the in vitro study, a human conjunctiva-derived cell line was treated with 0.02% BAC-containing latanoprost or timolol, unpreserved timolol, or 0.02% BAC alone for 15 minutes, followed or not by 4 or 24 hours of cell recovery in normal medium. Cell viability and chromatin condensation were evaluated using microplate cold light cytofluorometry with the neutral red and the Hoechst 33342 tests, respectively. The Hoechst-neutral red ratio was defined for the apoptosis assay, and cytoskeleton changes were assessed by confocal microscopy. No difference was found between normal eyes and those receiving unpreserved timolol. Preserved latanoprost and timolol significantly increased the inflammatory marker expression and decreased MUC5AC expression, but to a significantly higher extent in the preserved timolol group compared with latanoprost. In vitro, 0.02% BAC-containing timolol and latanoprost triggered conjunctival cell apoptosis-however, to a significantly lesser extent than did 0.02% BAC alone. Unpreserved timolol did not cause any cell toxicity. These ex vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that BAC-containing latanoprost and timolol exhibit higher proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects on conjunctival cells than does unpreserved timolol. Latanoprost caused less toxicity, however, than preserved timolol, and both drugs were less toxic than BAC alone. These results suggest a potential protective effect of the prostaglandin analogue and to a lesser extent of timolol against the toxicity of BAC in conjunctival cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The ocular surface of glaucoma patients treated over the long term expresses inflammatory markers related to both T-helper 1 and T-helper 2 pathways.

              To investigate the expression of CCR5 and CCR4, two chemokine receptors, as markers of the T helper (Th) 1 and Th2 pathways, respectively, and class II antigen HLA-DR as a hallmark of inflammation on conjunctival cells obtained from patients receiving long-term glaucoma treatment. Case-control study. A total of 18 normal subjects and 70 glaucoma patients treated with topical antiglaucoma drugs for more than 1 year: 14 receiving a beta-blocker as monotherapy, 38 treated with a prostaglandin analog alone (19 with latanoprost, 6 with travoprost, 13 with bimatoprost), and 18 receiving multiple treatments. Impression cytologic specimens (ICSs) were obtained from 1 eye of the patients and processed for flow cytometry. Conjunctival cells were extracted and incubated with monoclonal antibodies against CCR4, CCR5, HLA-DR, or their specific controls to measure, in a masked manner, the percentages of conjunctival cells positive for the 3 markers. HLA-DR and chemokine receptors (CCR4 and CCR5) in ICSs. Compared with all other groups, HLA-DR expression was raised significantly in the multitreatment group, whereas all monotherapies showed slight and nonsignificant increases. Both CCR4 and CCR5 were increased significantly in all 5 glaucoma groups compared with normal subjects, with no between-group differences. This study demonstrates the overexpression of 2 chemokine receptors in the conjunctival epithelium of glaucoma patients treated over the long term. These results show the simultaneous overexpression of CCR4 and CCR5, suggesting that the chronic use of topical treatments may stimulate both the Th1 and Th2 systems simultaneously. These results also suggest that inflammatory mechanisms combining allergy with toxicity are at work and illustrate the complexity of inflammatory reactions occurring in the ocular surface of glaucoma patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                26 February 2017
                March 2017
                : 18
                : 3
                : 509
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China; muyangmay@ 123456126.com (Q.Y.); LXP__2171@ 123456126.com (X.L.); yankewangnan@ 123456126.com (N.W.); songzhenyu08@ 123456sina.com (Z.S.)
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning 437100, China; zhangyafang709@ 123456163.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: wukaili@ 123456mail.sysu.edu.cn ; Tel.: +86-20-8733-3233; Fax: +86-20-8733-3271
                Article
                ijms-18-00509
                10.3390/ijms18030509
                5372525
                28245636
                5f243d05-9725-4409-bbcd-fd77a9e989af
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 January 2017
                : 23 February 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                benzalkonium chloride,cornea,conjunctiva,mouse,c57bl/6,balb/c
                Molecular biology
                benzalkonium chloride, cornea, conjunctiva, mouse, c57bl/6, balb/c

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content121

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors370