19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association Studies of ERCC1 Polymorphisms with Lung Cancer Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 (ERCC1) is an essential component of the nucleotide excision repair system that is responsible for repairing damaged DNA. Functional genetic variations in the ERCC1 gene may alter DNA repair capacity and modulate cancer risk. The putative roles of ERCC1 gene polymorphisms in lung cancer susceptibility have been widely investigated. However, the results remain controversial.

          Objectives

          An updated meta-analysis was conducted to explore whether lung cancer risk could be attributed to the following ERCC1 polymorphisms: rs11615 (T>C), rs3212986 (C>A), rs3212961 (A>C), rs3212948 (G>C), rs2298881 (C>A).

          Methods

          Several major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus) and the Chinese Biomedical database were searched for eligible studies. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the strength of associations.

          Results

          Sixteen studies with 10,106 cases and 13,238 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled ORs from 11 eligible studies (8,215 cases vs. 11,402 controls) suggested a significant association of ERCC1 rs11615 with increased risk for lung cancer (homozygous: CC versus TT, OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04–1.48, P = 0.02). However, such an association was disproportionately driven by a single study. Removal of that study led to null association. Moreover, initial analyses suggested that ERCC1 rs11615 exerts a more profound effect on the susceptibility of non-smokers to lung cancer than that of smokers. Moreover, no statistically significant association was found between remaining ERCC1 polymorphisms of interest and lung cancer risk, except for rs3212948 variation (heterozygous: CG vs.GG, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90, P = 0.001; dominant: CG/CC vs.GG, OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69–0.91, P = 0.001).

          Conclusion

          Overall, this meta-analysis suggests that ERCC1 rs3212948 G>C, but not others, is a lung cancer risk-associated polymorphism. Carefully designed studies with large sample size involving different ethnicity, smoking status, and cancer types are needed to validate these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Polymorphisms in the XPG gene and risk of gastric cancer in Chinese populations.

          DNA repair genes play an important role in maintaining stability and integrity of genomic DNA. Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes may cause variations in DNA repair capacity phenotype and thus contribute to cancer risk. In this case-control study of 1,125 gastric cancer cases and 1,196 cancer-free controls, we investigated the association between three functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, rs2296147T > C, rs2094258C > T and rs873601G > A) in the xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG) gene and gastric cancer risk. We used the Taqman assays to genotype these three SNPs and logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We found that only the rs873601A variant genotypes were associated with a significant higher risk for gastric adenocarcinoma (adjusted OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.03-1.64 for AA vs. GG and adjusted OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.49 for AA vs. GG/AG). Stratification analysis indicated that this risk was more pronounced in subgroups of older age (>59 years), males, ever-smokers, and patients with NGCA. All these were not found for the other two SNPs (rs2296147T > C and rs2094258C > T). We then performed expression analysis using gastric cancer adjacent normal tissues from 141 patients and found that the A variant allele was associated with non-significantly reduced expression of XPG mRNA (P(trend) = 0.107). Further analysis using mRNA expression data from the HapMap suggested that the A allele was associated with significantly reduced expression of XPG mRNA in normal cell lines for 45 Chinese (P(trend) = 0.003) as well as for 261 subjects with different ethnicities (P(trend) = 0.001). These support the hypothesis that functional XPG variants may contribute to the risk of gastric cancer. Larger studies with different ethnic populations are warranted to validate our findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and risk of non-small cell lung cancer.

            Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality with an inter-individual difference in susceptibility to the disease. The inheritance of low-efficiency genotypes involved in DNA repair and replication may contribute to the difference in susceptibility. We investigated 44 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 20 DNA repair genes including nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes XPA, ERCC1, ERCC2/XPD, ERCC4/XPF and ERCC5/XPG; base excision repair (BER) genes APE1/APEX, OGG1, MPG, XRCC1, PCNA, POLB, POLiota, LIG3 and EXO1; double-strand break repair (DSB-R) genes XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC9, NBS1 and ATR; and direct damage reversal (DR) gene MGMT/AGT. The study included 343 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and 413 controls from Norwegian general population. Our results indicate that SNPs in the NER genes ERCC1 (Asn118Asn, 15310G>C, 8902G>T), XPA (-4G>A), ERCC2/XPD (Lys751Gln) and ERCC5/XPD (His46His); the BER genes APE1/APEX (Ile64Val), OGG1 (Ser326Cys), PCNA (1876A>G) and XRCC1 (Arg194Trp, Arg280His, Arg399Gln); and the DSB-R genes ATR (Thr211Met), NBS1 (Glu185Gln), XRCC2 (Arg188His) and XRCC9 (Thr297Ile) modulate NSCLC risk. The level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA (PAH-DNA) adducts in normal lung tissue from 211 patients was analysed. The variant alleles of XRCC1(Arg280His), XRCC1 (Arg399Gln), ERCC1(G8092T), ERCC5(His46His) and MGMT/AGT(Lys178Arg) were more frequent in patients with PAH-DNA adduct levels lower than the mean whereas the XRCC1(Arg194Trp) variant was more frequent in cases with higher adduct levels than the mean.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA repair polymorphisms and cancer risk in non-smokers in a cohort study.

              Environmental carcinogens contained in air pollution, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines or N-nitroso compounds, predominantly form DNA adducts but can also generate interstrand cross-links and reactive oxygen species. If unrepaired, such lesions increase the risk of somatic mutations and cancer. Our study investigated the relationships between 22 polymorphisms (and their haplotypes) in 16 DNA repair genes belonging to different repair pathways in 1094 controls and 567 cancer cases (bladder cancer, 131; lung cancer, 134; oral-pharyngeal cancer, 41; laryngeal cancer, 47; leukaemia, 179; death from emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 84). The design was a case-control study nested within a prospective investigation. Among the many comparisons, few polymorphisms were associated with the diseases at the univariate analysis: XRCC1-399 Gln/Gln variant homozygotes [odds ratios (OR) = 2.20, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.16-4.17] and XRCC3-241 Met/Met homozygotes (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27-0.96) and leukaemia. The recessive model in the stepwise multivariate analysis revealed a possible protective effect of XRCC1-399Gln/Gln in lung cancer (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.05-0.98), and confirmed an opposite effect (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.02-6.02) in the leukaemia group. Our results also suggest that the XPD/ERCC1-GAT haplotype may modulate leukaemia (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.02-1.61), bladder cancer (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.06-1.79) and possibly other cancer risks. Further investigations of the combined effects of polymorphisms within these DNA repair genes, smoking and other risk factors may help to clarify the influence of genetic variation in the carcinogenic process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                19 May 2014
                : 9
                : 5
                : e97616
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                [2 ]Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
                [3 ]Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                [4 ]Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
                [5 ]Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                [6 ]Department of Thoracic Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                [7 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
                [8 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JHZ RXH SYP JQM. Analyzed the data: JHZ RXH JJ LQZ XWS YGL YQS KS JWL SYP JQM. Wrote the paper: JHZ RXH.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-51100
                10.1371/journal.pone.0097616
                4026486
                24841208
                5fa8cdcd-842a-46ed-ae47-047679658112
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 18 December 2013
                : 21 April 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This research was supported by a grant (1252HQ016) funded by Heilongjiang Education Department of China and a grant funded by Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Genetics
                Human Genetics
                Genetic Association Studies
                Population Biology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Cancer Epidemiology
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Cancer Prevention
                Cancer Risk Factors
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Systematic Reviews
                Research Design
                Clinical Research Design

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article