18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Assessment of Visual-Field Changes before and after Focal Photocoagulation for Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Visual fields were compared before and after focal photocoagulation for eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and clinically significant diabetic macular edema. A total of 8 eyes was tested before treatment and 6–8 weeks after treatment using static automated visual fields (Octopus). The visual-field indices, mean defect (MD) and corrected loss variance, were employed as measures of retinal sensitivity. Our results show that focal photocoagulation (CLV) generally depressed sensitivity (increased MD) in the treated central 10° field, whereas in the untreated control region (10–30°) sensitivity generally remained stable. However, the whole-field indices indicated that overall the fields remained stable following focal photocoagulation treatment. These results suggest that although focal treatment produces local absolute visual-field defects, the effects are small relative to the global indices.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          OPH
          Ophthalmologica
          10.1159/issn.0030-3755
          Ophthalmologica
          S. Karger AG
          0030-3755
          1423-0267
          1990
          1990
          31 March 2010
          : 200
          : 3
          : 133-141
          Affiliations
          Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA
          Article
          310094 Ophthalmologica 1990;200:133–141
          10.1159/000310094
          2345627
          6073ad0e-9049-4cbb-a932-ba5f7f5a53a3
          © 1990 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 14 August 1989
          : 24 August 1989
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
          Visual fields,Focal photocoagulation,Diabetic macular edema,Corrected loss variance,Mean defect

          Comments

          Comment on this article