21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anodal Stimulation of the Left DLPFC Increases IGT Scores and Decreases Delay Discounting Rate in Healthy Males

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous correlational imaging studies have implicated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in decision making. Using High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS), the present study directly investigated the causal role of the DLPFC in performing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Inter-Temporal Choice (ITC) task. Three experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 ( N = 41) to study the left DLPFC, Experiment 2 ( N = 49) to study the right DLPFC, and Experiment 3 ( N = 20, a subset of those in Experiment 1) to switch the experimental and control conditions. All participants were healthy male college students. For Experiments 1 and 2, participants were randomly assigned to either the HD-tDCS or the sham stimulation condition. For Experiment 3, participants were assigned to the condition they were not in during Experiment 1. Results showed that HD-tDCS over the left DLPFC increased IGT score, decreased the recency parameter in IGT, and lowered delay discounting rate ( k) in the ITC task. We discussed the potential roles of impulse control and time perception in mediating the effect of tDCS stimulation of left DLPFC on decision making. Our results have clinical implications for the treatment of disorders involving poor decision-making, such as addictions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

          In this paper we demonstrate in the intact human the possibility of a non-invasive modulation of motor cortex excitability by the application of weak direct current through the scalp. Excitability changes of up to 40 %, revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation, were accomplished and lasted for several minutes after the end of current stimulation. Excitation could be achieved selectively by anodal stimulation, and inhibition by cathodal stimulation. By varying the current intensity and duration, the strength and duration of the after-effects could be controlled. The effects were probably induced by modification of membrane polarisation. Functional alterations related to post-tetanic potentiation, short-term potentiation and processes similar to postexcitatory central inhibition are the likely candidates for the excitability changes after the end of stimulation. Transcranial electrical stimulation using weak current may thus be a promising tool to modulate cerebral excitability in a non-invasive, painless, reversible, selective and focal way.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.

            When humans are offered the choice between rewards available at different points in time, the relative values of the options are discounted according to their expected delays until delivery. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined the neural correlates of time discounting while subjects made a series of choices between monetary reward options that varied by delay to delivery. We demonstrate that two separate systems are involved in such decisions. Parts of the limbic system associated with the midbrain dopamine system, including paralimbic cortex, are preferentially activated by decisions involving immediately available rewards. In contrast, regions of the lateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex are engaged uniformly by intertemporal choices irrespective of delay. Furthermore, the relative engagement of the two systems is directly associated with subjects' choices, with greater relative fronto-parietal activity when subjects choose longer term options.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system.

              Every day, individuals make dozens of choices between an alternative with higher overall value and a more tempting but ultimately inferior option. Optimal decision-making requires self-control. We propose two hypotheses about the neurobiology of self-control: (i) Goal-directed decisions have their basis in a common value signal encoded in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and (ii) exercising self-control involves the modulation of this value signal by dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor brain activity while dieters engaged in real decisions about food consumption. Activity in vmPFC was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self-control. It incorporated both taste and health in self-controllers but only taste in non-self-controllers. Activity in DLPFC increased when subjects exercised self-control and correlated with activity in vmPFC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                20 September 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1421
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Decision Neuroscience Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University Chongqing, China
                [2] 2Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Southwest University Chongqing, China
                [3] 3Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China
                [4] 4Southwest University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment Toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal University Chongqing, China
                [5] 5Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine CA, USA
                [6] 6National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University Beijing, China
                [7] 7Brain and Creativity Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: O’Dhaniel A. Mullette-Gillman, National University of Singapore, Singapore

                Reviewed by: Marian Berryhill, University of Nevada, Reno, USA; George Christopoulos, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

                *Correspondence: Qinghua He, heqinghua@ 123456swu.edu.cn

                These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01421
                5028393
                27703440
                607c3e16-c4b2-4dce-a89f-2abd3eb0f4b7
                Copyright © 2016 He, Chen, Chen, Xue, Feng and Bechara.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 April 2016
                : 05 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 80, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 31400959
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                decision making,hd-tdcs,dlpfc,igt,inter-temporal choice task
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                decision making, hd-tdcs, dlpfc, igt, inter-temporal choice task

                Comments

                Comment on this article