Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Endothelium-Dependent Relaxing Factors Do Not Affect the Smooth Muscle of Portal-Mesenteric Veins

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Experiments were designed to analyze the difference in endothelium-dependent responsiveness to acetylcholine between arteries and veins. The effect of endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s) released from femoral arteries of the dog was compared on the coronary artery of the dog, the aorta of the rat, and portal-mesenteric veins of both species. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s) released by canine femoral arteries induced comparable relaxation of the canine coronary artery and the aorta of the rat. However, neither the canine nor the rat portal vein relaxed when exposed to endothelium-derived relaxing factors) released by the femoral arterial segments. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s) did not affect the action potentials and the spontaneous activity of the rat portal vein. Sodium nitroprusside induced complete relaxation of the canine coronary artery but failed to abolish the spontaneously evoked contractions of the portal veins. These experiments suggest that the longitudinal smooth muscle of portal veins is insensitive to endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s), presumably because of a different sensitivity of guanylate cyclase. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor does not possess calcium-entry blocking properties.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JVR
          J Vasc Res
          10.1159/issn.1018-1172
          Journal of Vascular Research
          S. Karger AG
          1018-1172
          1423-0135
          1989
          1989
          23 September 2008
          : 26
          : 1
          : 21-32
          Affiliations
          Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., USA
          Article
          158749 Blood Vessels 1989;26:21–32
          10.1159/000158749
          © 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 12
          Categories
          Research Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article