1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experimental investigation of the effective point of measurement for plane‐parallel chambers used in electron beam dosimetry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, the effective point of measurement (EPOM) for plane‐parallel ionization chambers in clinical high‐energy electron beams was determined experimentally. Previous studies have reported that the EPOM of plane‐parallel chambers is shifted several tens of millimeters downstream from the inner surface of the entrance window to the cavity. These findings were based on the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, and few experimental studies have been performed. Thus, additional experimental validations of the reported EPOMs were required. In this study, we investigated the EPOMs of three plane‐parallel chambers (NACP‐02, Roos and Advanced Markus) for clinical electron beams. The EPOMs were determined by comparing the measured percentage depth‐dose (PDD) of the plane‐parallel chambers and the PDD obtained using the microDiamond detector. The optimal shift to the EPOM was energy‐dependent. The determined EPOM showed no chamber‐to‐chamber variation, thereby allowing the use of a single value. The mean optimal shifts were 0.104 ± 0.011, 0.040 ± 0.012, and 0.012 ± 0.009 cm for NACP‐02, Roos, and Advanced Markus, respectively. These values are valid in the R 50 range from 2.40 to 8.82 cm, which correspond to 6–22 MeV. Roos and Advanced Markus exhibited similar results to those of the previous studies, but NACP‐02 showed a larger shift. This is probably due to the uncertainty of the entrance window of NACP‐02. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully consider where the optimal EPOM is located when using this chamber.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.

          A protocol is prescribed for clinical reference dosimetry of external beam radiation therapy using photon beams with nominal energies between 60Co and 50 MV and electron beams with nominal energies between 4 and 50 MeV. The protocol was written by Task Group 51 (TG-51) of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and has been formally approved by the AAPM for clinical use. The protocol uses ion chambers with absorbed-dose-to-water calibration factors, N(60Co)D,w which are traceable to national primary standards, and the equation D(Q)w = MkQN(60Co)D,w where Q is the beam quality of the clinical beam, D(Q)w is the absorbed dose to water at the point of measurement of the ion chamber placed under reference conditions, M is the fully corrected ion chamber reading, and kQ is the quality conversion factor which converts the calibration factor for a 60Co beam to that for a beam of quality Q. Values of kQ are presented as a function of Q for many ion chambers. The value of M is given by M = PionP(TP)PelecPpolMraw, where Mraw is the raw, uncorrected ion chamber reading and Pion corrects for ion recombination, P(TP) for temperature and pressure variations, Pelec for inaccuracy of the electrometer if calibrated separately, and Ppol for chamber polarity effects. Beam quality, Q, is specified (i) for photon beams, by %dd(10)x, the photon component of the percentage depth dose at 10 cm depth for a field size of 10x10 cm2 on the surface of a phantom at an SSD of 100 cm and (ii) for electron beams, by R50, the depth at which the absorbed-dose falls to 50% of the maximum dose in a beam with field size > or =10x10 cm2 on the surface of the phantom (> or =20x20 cm2 for R50>8.5 cm) at an SSD of 100 cm. R50 is determined directly from the measured value of I50, the depth at which the ionization falls to 50% of its maximum value. All clinical reference dosimetry is performed in a water phantom. The reference depth for calibration purposes is 10 cm for photon beams and 0.6R50-0.1 cm for electron beams. For photon beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed in either an SSD or SAD setup with a 10x10 cm2 field size defined on the phantom surface for an SSD setup or at the depth of the detector for an SAD setup. For electron beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed with a field size of > or =10x10 cm2 (> or =20x20 cm2 for R50>8.5 cm) at an SSD between 90 and 110 cm. This protocol represents a major simplification compared to the AAPM's TG-21 protocol in the sense that large tables of stopping-power ratios and mass-energy absorption coefficients are not needed and the user does not need to calculate any theoretical dosimetry factors. Worksheets for various situations are presented along with a list of equipment required.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficiency improvements for ion chamber calculations in high energy photon beams.

            This article presents the implementation of several variance reduction techniques that dramatically improve the simulation efficiency of ion chamber dose and perturbation factor calculations. The cavity user code for the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system is extended by photon cross-section enhancement (XCSE), an intermediate phase-space storage (IPSS) technique, and a correlated sampling (CS) scheme. XCSE increases the density of photon interaction sites inside and in the vicinity of the chamber and results-in combination with a Russian Roulette game for electrons that cannot reach the cavity volume-in an increased efficiency of up to a factor of 350 for calculating dose in a Farmer type chamber placed at 10 cm depth in a water phantom. In combination with the IPSS and CS techniques, the efficiency for the calculation of the central electrode perturbation factor Pcel can be increased by up to three orders of magnitude for a single chamber location and by nearly four orders of magnitude when considering the Pcel variation with depth or with distance from the central axis in a large field photon beam. The intermediate storage of the phase-space properties of particles entering a volume that contains many possible chamber locations leads to efficiency improvements by a factor larger than 500 when computing a profile of chamber doses in the field of a linear accelerator photon beam. All techniques are combined in a new EGSnrc user code egs_chamber. Optimum settings for the variance reduction parameters are investigated and are reported for a Farmer type ion chamber. A few example calculations illustrating the capabilities of the egs_chamber code are presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Determination of the recombination correction factor kS for some specific plane-parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers in pulsed photon and electron beams.

              It has been shown from an evaluation of the inverse reading of the dosemeter (1/M) against the inverse of the polarizing voltage (1/V), obtained with a number of commercially available ionization chambers, using dose per pulse values between 0.16 and 5 mGy, that a linear relationship between the recombination correction factor kS and dose per pulse (DPP) can be found. At dose per pulse values above 1 mGy the method of a general equation with coefficients dependent on the chamber type gives more accurate results than the Boag method. This method was already proposed by Burns and McEwen (1998, Phys. Med. Biol. 43 2033) and avoids comprehensive and time-consuming measurements of Jaffé plots which are a prerequisite for the application of the multi-voltage analysis (MVA) or the two-voltage analysis (TVA). We evaluated and verified the response of ionization chambers on the recombination effect in pulsed accelerator beams for both photons and electrons. Our main conclusions are: (1) The correction factor k(S) depends only on the DPP and the chamber type. There is no influence of radiation type and energy. (2) For all the chambers investigated there is a linear relationship between kS and DPP up to 5 mGy/pulse, and for two chambers we could show linearity up to 40 mGy/pulse. (3) A general formalism, such as that of Boag, characterizes chambers exclusively by the distance of the electrodes and gives a trend for the correction factor, and therefore (4) a general formalism has to reflect the influence of the chamber construction on the recombination by the introduction of chamber-type dependent coefficients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yfujita@komazawa-u.ac.jp
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                12 June 2023
                July 2023
                : 24
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.v24.7 )
                : e14059
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiological Sciences Komazawa University Graduate School Setagaya‐ku Tokyo Japan
                [ 2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital Bunkyo‐ku Tokyo Japan
                [ 3 ] Department of Radiological Sciences Komazawa University Setagaya‐ku Tokyo Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Yukio Fujita, Department of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, 1‐23‐1 Komazawa, Setagaya‐ku, Tokyo, 154‐8525, Japan.

                Email: yfujita@ 123456komazawa-u.ac.jp

                Article
                ACM214059
                10.1002/acm2.14059
                10338742
                37307247
                61366444-022d-4631-823f-1da4e5fcc926
                © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 March 2023
                : 08 December 2022
                : 18 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 4790
                Categories
                Radiation Measurements
                Radiation Measurements
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.1 mode:remove_FC converted:13.07.2023

                effective point of measurement,electron beam dosimetry,ion chamber,microdiamond

                Comments

                Comment on this article