13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A phase I study of cediranib in combination with cilengitide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite being a highly vascularized tumor, glioblastoma response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is transient, possibly because of tumor co-option of preexisting blood vessels and infiltration into surrounding brain. Integrins, which are upregulated after VEGF inhibition, may play a critical role in this resistance mechanism. We designed a study of cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with cilengitide, an integrin inhibitor.

          Methods

          This phase I study was conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Once the maximum tolerated dose was determined, 40 patients enrolled in a dose expansion cohort with 20 being exposed to anti-VEGF therapy and 20 being naive. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, proportion of participants alive and progression free at 6 months, radiographic response, and exploratory analyses of physiological imaging and blood biomarkers.

          Results

          Forty-five patients enrolled, and no dose toxicities were observed at a dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and cilengitide 2000 mg twice weekly. Complete response was seen in 2 participants, partial response in 2, stable disease in 13, and progression in 21; 7 participants were not evaluable. Median overall survival was 6.5 months, median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and progression-free survival at 6 months was 4.4%. Plasma-soluble VEGFR2 decreased with treatment and placental growth factor, carbonic anhydrase IX, and SDF1α, and cerebral blood flow increased.

          Conclusions

          The combination of cediranib with cilengitide was well tolerated and associated with changes in pharmacodynamic blood and imaging biomarkers. However, the survival and response rates do not warrant further development of this combination.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neuro Oncol
          Neuro-oncology
          neuonc
          neuonc
          Neuro-Oncology
          Oxford University Press
          1522-8517
          1523-5866
          October 2015
          24 May 2015
          : 17
          : 10
          : 1386-1392
          Affiliations
          Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, Massachusetts (E.R.G., D.G.D., R.K.J., T.T.B.); Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland (X.Y., S.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts (E.R.G., M.A.L.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (T.M.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (T.J.K.); Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (J.J.O.); University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama (B.L.N.); Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio (M.S.A.); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.)
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Elizabeth R. Gerstner, MD, 55 Fruit St. Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA 02114 ( egerstner@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu ).
          Article
          PMC4578584 PMC4578584 4578584 nov085
          10.1093/neuonc/nov085
          4578584
          26008604
          62b3f18d-9731-4fe2-9c66-f9d1c77b2551
          © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
          History
          : 4 March 2015
          : 10 April 2015
          Categories
          Clinical Investigations

          biomarker,angiogenesis,glioblastoma,invasion,treatment
          biomarker, angiogenesis, glioblastoma, invasion, treatment

          Comments

          Comment on this article