4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Delirium in Adults With COVID-19–Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome : Comparison With Other Etiologies

      research-article
      , MD, PhD , , RN, MScN, , PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, FAES, on behalf of the CORO-NEURO-ICU Study Group
      Neurology
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          Neurologic complications have been associated with COVID-19, including delirium. Such complications have been reported to be frequent among intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients. We hypothesized that the rate of neurologic complications would be higher in COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) than those who develop ARDS from a different cause.

          Methods

          We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the adult ICU of Lausanne University Hospital, including all consecutive patients fulfilling the Berlin criteria for ARDS hospitalized between December 2017 and June 2021, stratifying exposure between COVID-19 or not. The primary outcome was delirium onset during ICU stay, defined by the confusion assessment method (CAM-ICU). Exploratory outcomes included development of neurologic complications of the central nervous system (stroke, hemorrhage, and vasculitis), critical illness weakness, and 30- and 180-day all-cause mortality.

          Results

          Three hundred eleven patients were included in the study (253 with COVID-19 and 58 with other causes) and CAM-ICU could be assessed in 231 (74.3% in COVID-19 vs 74.1% in non-COVID-19). The proportion of patients developing delirium was similar in patients with COVID-19 and controls in univariate comparison (69.1% vs 60.5%, p = 0.246). Yet, patients with COVID-19 had a higher body mass index, lower ICU severity, longer mechanical ventilation, and higher sedation doses (propofol and dexmedetomidine). After adjusting for these factors in a multivariable analysis, the risk of delirium remained comparable across groups (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.86 [0.35–2.1]). Similarly, COVID-19–related ARDS had no effect on all-cause mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR: 0.87 [0.39–1.92]) and 180 days (adjusted OR: 0.67 [0.33–1.35]). Finally, neurologic complications affecting the CNS (adjusted OR: 1.15 [0.25–5.29]) and critical illness weakness (adjusted OR: 2.99 [0.97–9.1]) were not higher in the COVID-19 group.

          Discussion

          Compared with other etiologies, patients with COVID-19 did not have higher incidence of delirium and other neurologic complications, after accounting for underlying disease severity in patients with ARDS. Management of COVID-19–associated ARDS needed longer invasive ventilation and higher sedation, which could explain higher rates of delirium in uncontrolled studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19

          Progressive respiratory failure is the primary cause of death in the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. Despite widespread interest in the pathophysiology of the disease, relatively little is known about the associated morphologic and molecular changes in the peripheral lung of patients who die from Covid-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

            The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined in 1994 by the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC); since then, issues regarding the reliability and validity of this definition have emerged. Using a consensus process, a panel of experts convened in 2011 (an initiative of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine endorsed by the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine) developed the Berlin Definition, focusing on feasibility, reliability, validity, and objective evaluation of its performance. A draft definition proposed 3 mutually exclusive categories of ARDS based on degree of hypoxemia: mild (200 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg), moderate (100 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg), and severe (PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 100 mm Hg) and 4 ancillary variables for severe ARDS: radiographic severity, respiratory system compliance (≤40 mL/cm H2O), positive end-expiratory pressure (≥10 cm H2O), and corrected expired volume per minute (≥10 L/min). The draft Berlin Definition was empirically evaluated using patient-level meta-analysis of 4188 patients with ARDS from 4 multicenter clinical data sets and 269 patients with ARDS from 3 single-center data sets containing physiologic information. The 4 ancillary variables did not contribute to the predictive validity of severe ARDS for mortality and were removed from the definition. Using the Berlin Definition, stages of mild, moderate, and severe ARDS were associated with increased mortality (27%; 95% CI, 24%-30%; 32%; 95% CI, 29%-34%; and 45%; 95% CI, 42%-48%, respectively; P < .001) and increased median duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors (5 days; interquartile [IQR], 2-11; 7 days; IQR, 4-14; and 9 days; IQR, 5-17, respectively; P < .001). Compared with the AECC definition, the final Berlin Definition had better predictive validity for mortality, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.577 (95% CI, 0.561-0.593) vs 0.536 (95% CI, 0.520-0.553; P < .001). This updated and revised Berlin Definition for ARDS addresses a number of the limitations of the AECC definition. The approach of combining consensus discussions with empirical evaluation may serve as a model to create more accurate, evidence-based, critical illness syndrome definitions and to better inform clinical care, research, and health services planning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study

              Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients. Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                15 November 2022
                15 November 2022
                : 99
                : 20
                : e2326-e2335
                Affiliations
                From the Neurology Service (R.B.-V., R.A.D.P., A.O.R.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences; Department of Intensive Care Medicine (E.F., J.-D.C.); Neuroscience Critical Care Research Group (A.B.), Department of Intensive Care Medicine; and Medical Direction (M.O.), Lausanne University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois) and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Bernard-Valnet raphael.bernard-valnet@ 123456chuv.ch

                Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                This Null Hypothesis article is published as part of a collaborative effort between Neurology ® and CBMRT.

                CORO-NEURO-ICU study group coinvestigators are listed in the appendix at the end of the article.

                Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Rebecca Burch, MD.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-344X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-2525
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6433-6254
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-3434
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-172X
                Article
                WNL-2022-201091 00016
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000201162
                9695422
                36376086
                63333726-29fb-4f9b-b448-1eaeecbeb13d
                Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 April 2022
                : 11 July 2022
                Categories
                299
                359
                360
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                CME
                NULL_HYPOTHESIS/CBMRT
                ONLINE-ONLY

                Comments

                Comment on this article