3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does Bone-targeted Therapy Benefit Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

      research-article
      ,
      Translational Oncology
      Neoplasia Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the bone is the second most common site of metastasis and is associated with increased morbidity and poorer quality of life. Bone-targeted therapies (BTTs) such as denosumab and zoledronic acid may prevent skeletal-related events (SREs). However, the benefit of BTTs in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review at the Urologic Cancer Centre for Research and Innovation. Patients with mRCC were included if they had bone metastases treated with TKIs between 2010 and 2017. Our primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the time elapsed from clinical diagnosis of mRCC to death, and modelled using the Kaplan–Meier method. Secondary outcomes included the median time to SRE and the analysis of prognostic factors of OS using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In total, 230 patients with mRCC were identified; of which, 46 had bone metastases treated with TKIs and were included in the study (TKI-only, n = 37; TKI + BTT, n = 9). In the TKI + BTT cohort, patients received either denosumab ( n = 5) or zoledronic acid ( n = 4). At the time of analysis, 63% of patients were deceased. We observed an OS trend favouring the TKI + BTT cohort (13.8 months [95% confidence interval {CI}: 12.3–15.2] vs. 29.6 months [95% CI: 7.2–51.9], hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66 (95% CI: 0.62–4.45), P = 0.31). When patients in the TKI + BTT cohort were stratified by type of therapy (denosumab or zoledronic acid), the median time to SRE was similar between the groups (4.2 months [95% CI: 2.28–6.14] vs. 2.2 months [95% CI: not available], P = 0.71]. On univariate or multivariate analysis, it was found that age, gender, comorbidities, International metastatic RCC database consortium (IMDC) prognostic group and pathologic tumour grade were not significant predictors of worse OS. Pathologic stage 3 or 4 was an independent predictor of worse OS (HR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.41–24.03, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: BTTs may have a continued role in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Further prospective data are required to validate our findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of cancer pain.

          R Portenoy (2011)
          In patients with active cancer, the management of chronic pain is an essential element in a comprehensive strategy for palliative care. This strategy emphasises multidimensional assessment and the coordinated use of treatments that together mitigate suffering and provide support to the patient and family. This review describes this framework, an approach to pain assessment, and widely accepted techniques to optimise the safety and effectiveness of opioid drugs and other treatments. The advances of recent decades suggest a future that includes increased evidence-based targeting of specific analgesic interventions within an individualised plan of care that is appropriate throughout the course of illness. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Approval summary for zoledronic acid for treatment of multiple myeloma and cancer bone metastases.

            This article summarizes data submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration for marketing approval of zoledronic acid (Zol; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ), a bisphosphonate drug for treating patients with bone metastases. We review the chemistry, toxicology, pharmacology, and clinical study results submitted to support the supplemental New Drug Application for Zol for treatment of patients with bone metastases. Four- and 8-mg Zol doses were selected for Phase III trials based on bone resorption markers and clinical efficacy parameters. Patients with bone metastases were randomized in three Phase III studies (prostate cancer, solid tumors, and multiple myeloma or breast cancer) to receive 4 or 8 mg of Zol or to a control arm. The control was a placebo in the prostate cancer study and the other solid tumor study and was 90 mg of pamidronate (Pam) in the study of breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Studies were amended twice because of renal toxicity, initially to increase Zol infusion time from 5 to 15 min and later to decrease the dose in the Zol 8-mg arm to 4 mg. The efficacy end point was skeletal-related events (SREs), a composite end point consisting of pathologic fracture, radiation therapy to bone, changes in antineoplastic therapy for bone pain (prostate cancer only), surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression. This end point was analyzed either as the proportion of patients with SRE or time to first SRE. The breast cancer and myeloma study used a noninferiority statistical analysis methods to determine efficacy. In prostate cancer, both the proportions analysis and time-to-SRE analysis showed significantly less bone morbidity on Zol (4 mg) than placebo, but no significant difference between Zol (8 mg) and placebo in either analysis. In the solid tumor study, the time to SRE analysis but not the proportions analysis showed significantly less skeletal morbidity on Zol (4 mg) than placebo, and Zol (8 mg) was significantly better than placebo in both analyses. The breast cancer and myeloma study demonstrated noninferiority of Zol compared with Pam, with Zol retaining at least 49.3% of the Pam treatment effect previously demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials. Zol was approved on February 22, 2002, by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the "treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and documented bone metastases from solid tumors, in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. Prostate cancer should have progressed after treatment with at least one hormonal therapy." The recommended dose and schedule is 4 mg of Zol infused over 15 min every 3-4 weeks. Increased Zol doses and shorter infusions are not recommended because of potential renal toxicity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prostate cancer cells-osteoblast interaction shifts expression of growth/survival-related genes in prostate cancer and reduces expression of osteoprotegerin in osteoblasts.

              Prostate cancer specifically metastasizes to bone where it leads to bone formation. We previously reported that coculturing MDA PCa 2b prostate cancer cells with primary mouse osteoblasts (PMOs) induced PMO proliferation and differentiation. An osteoblastic reaction was also observed in vivo after injection of MDA PCa 2b cells into the bones of severe combined immunodeficient disease mice. The aim of this study was to identify the sequence of events that leads to these osteoblastic lesions in vivo and, using this in vitro model, to define the contributions of various genes and cellular pathways in the pathophysiology of osteoblastic bone metastases of prostate cancer. We show histological evidence of de novo bone formation as early as 2 weeks after injection of MDA PCa 2b cells in the bone of severe combined immunodeficient disease mice. In vitro, we show that PMOs induce MDA PCa 2b proliferation, suggesting a synergistic paracrine loop between these cells and PMOs. Endothelin (ET)-1, which is a mitogen for several cell types, is produced by all prostate cancer cell lines tested, and Atrasentan, an antagonist of ET-1 receptor A, partially reversed PMO proliferation induced by MDA PCa 2b cells. ET-1 is known to be comitogenic with a number of growth factors, including insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. In this study, we report that IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 transcripts (that regulate levels of free IGF) are down-regulated in prostate cancer cells cocultured with PMO, whereas prostate-specific antigen (a protease known to cleave IGFBP-3) is detected in the 150-400 ng/ml range. Accordingly, IGFBP-3 has antiproliferative effects in PMOs, which were attenuated in our in vitro system. Taken together, our studies also implicate the IGF axis to play a role in this model of bone metastases. Secondly, the transcript level of mouse double minute 2 (a protein that regulate p53) was increased in prostate cancer cells grown with PMOs. The p53-dependent and -independent oncogenic activities of mouse double minute 2 suggest that osteoblasts induce a survival advantage in prostate cancer cells. Lastly, we show that expression of osteoprotegerin is decreased and of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand is increased in PMOs cultured in the presence of MDA PCa 2b cells, two events associated with osteoclast activation and bone resorption. Our results provide evidence that multiple and distinct molecular events affecting both bone formation and bone resorption concur to the increase bone mass in prostate cancer bone metastases. These data also provide a rationale for developing therapeutic strategies designed to target these molecular changes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transl Oncol
                Transl Oncol
                Translational Oncology
                Neoplasia Press
                1936-5233
                21 December 2019
                February 2020
                21 December 2019
                : 13
                : 2
                : 241-244
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                []Address all correspondence to: Anil Kapoor, G344 - 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. akapoor@ 123456mcmaster.ca
                Article
                S1936-5233(19)30374-2
                10.1016/j.tranon.2019.10.009
                6931200
                31869748
                63e5827a-9b2f-4a90-a9dc-655158291325
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 July 2019
                : 16 October 2019
                : 16 October 2019
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article