9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction:

          The most effective rate of fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock is unknown.

          Methods:

          We performed a randomized crossover pilot study in a healthy volunteer model of compensated haemorrhagic shock. Following venesection of 15 mL/kg of blood, participants were randomized to 20 mL/kg of crystalloid over 10 min (FAST treatment) or 30 min (SLOW treatment). The primary end point was oxygen delivery (DO 2). Secondary end points included pressure and flow-based haemodynamic variables, blood volume expansion, and clinical biochemistry.

          Results:

          Nine normotensive healthy adult volunteers participated. No significant differences were observed in DO 2 and biochemical variables between the SLOW and FAST groups. Blood volume was reduced by 16% following venesection, with a corresponding 5% reduction in cardiac index (CI) ( P < 0.001). Immediately following resuscitation the increase in blood volume corresponded to 54% of the infused volume under FAST treatment and 69% of the infused volume under SLOW treatment ( P = 0.03). This blood volume expansion attenuated with time to 24% and 25% of the infused volume 30 min postinfusion. During fluid resuscitation, blood pressure was higher under FAST treatment. However, CI paradoxically decreased in most participants during the resuscitation phase; a finding not observed under SLOW treatment.

          Conclusion:

          FAST or SLOW fluid resuscitation had no significant impact on DO 2 between treatment groups. In both groups, changes in CI and blood pressure did not reflect the magnitude of intravascular blood volume deficit. Crystalloid resuscitation expanded intravascular blood volume by approximately 25%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries.

          Fluid resuscitation may be detrimental when given before bleeding is controlled in patients with trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of delaying fluid resuscitation until the time of operative intervention in hypotensive patients with penetrating injuries to the torso. We conducted a prospective trial comparing immediate and delayed fluid resuscitation in 598 adults with penetrating torso injuries who presented with a pre-hospital systolic blood pressure of < or = 90 mm Hg. The study setting was a city with a single centralized system of pre-hospital emergency care and a single receiving facility for patients with major trauma. Patients assigned to the immediate-resuscitation group received standard fluid resuscitation before they reached the hospital and in the trauma center, and those assigned to the delayed-resuscitation group received intravenous cannulation but no fluid resuscitation until they reached the operating room. Among the 289 patients who received delayed fluid resuscitation, 203 (70 percent) survived and were discharged from the hospital, as compared with 193 of the 309 patients (62 percent) who received immediate fluid resuscitation (P = 0.04). The mean estimated intraoperative blood loss was similar in the two groups. Among the 238 patients in the delayed-resuscitation group who survived to the postoperative period, 55 (23 percent) had one or more complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis syndrome, acute renal failure, coagulopathy, wound infection, and pneumonia), as compared with 69 of the 227 patients (30 percent) in the immediate-resuscitation group (P = 0.08). The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the delayed-resuscitation group. For hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries, delay of aggressive fluid resuscitation until operative intervention improves the outcome.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff.

            The Finapres methodology offers continuous measurement of blood pressure (BP) in a noninvasive manner. The latest development using this methodology is the Nexfin monitor. The present study evaluated the accuracy of Nexfin noninvasive arterial pressure (NAP) compared with auscultatory BP measurements (Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff, RRK). In supine subjects NAP was compared to RRK, performed by two observers using an electronic stethoscope with double earpieces. Per subject, three NAP-RRK differences were determined for systolic and diastolic BP, and bias and precision of differences were expressed as median (25th, 75th percentiles). Within-subject precision was defined as the (25th, 75th percentiles) after removing the average individual difference. A total of 312 data sets of NAP and RRK for systolic and diastolic BP from 104 subjects (aged 18-95 years, 54 males) were compared. RRK systolic BP was 129 (115, 150), and diastolic BP was 80 (72, 89), NAP-RRK differences were 5.4 (-1.7, 11.0) mm Hg and -2.5 (-7.6, 2.3) mm Hg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively; within-subject precisions were (-2.2, 2.3) and (-1.6, 1.5) mm Hg, respectively. Nexfin provides accurate measurement of BP with good within-subject precision when compared to RRK.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The origin of the "ideal" body weight equations.

              To provide a historical perspective on the origin and similarity of the "ideal" body weight (IBW) equations, and clarify the terms ideal and lean body weight (LBW). Primary and review literature were identified using MEDLINE (1966-November 1999) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-November 1999) pertaining to ideal and lean weight, height-weight tables, and obesity. In addition, textbooks and relevant reference lists were reviewed. All articles identified through the data sources were evaluated. Information deemed to be relevant to the objectives of the review were included. Height-weight tables were generated to provide a means of comparing a population with respect to their relative weight. The weight data were found to correlate with mortality and resulted in the use of the terms desirable or ideal to describe these weights. Over the years, IBW was interpreted to represent a "fat-free" weight and thus was used as a surrogate for LBW. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs were found to correlate with IBW and resulted in the use of IBW equations published by Devine. These equations were consistent with an old rule that was developed from height-weight tables to estimate IBW. Efforts to improve the IBW equations through regression analyses of height-weight data resulted in equations similar to those published by Devine. The similarity between the IBW equations was a result of the general agreement among the various height-weight tables from which they were derived. Therefore, any one of these equations may be used to estimate IBW.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Shock
                Shock
                SHK
                Shock (Augusta, Ga.)
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1073-2322
                1540-0514
                August 2016
                15 July 2016
                : 46
                : 2
                : 149-157
                Affiliations
                []Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
                []Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
                []The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [§ ]Department of Anaesthesia, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [|| ]Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
                []Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia Perioperative Pain Medicine Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [∗∗ ]Södertälje Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
                [†† ]Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [‡‡ ]Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
                [§§ ]Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia Perioperative Pain Medicine Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                Address reprint requests to Laurence Weinberg, BSc, MBBCh, MRCP, DipCritCareEcho, FANZCA, MD, Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia; E-mail: laurence.weinberg@ 123456austin.org.au .
                Article
                10.1097/SHK.0000000000000610
                4957966
                26974423
                646f47a6-ae1a-419a-aa70-c9a7a5f48156
                Copyright © 2016 by the Shock Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 18 November 2015
                : 07 December 2015
                : 02 March 2016
                Categories
                Clinical Science Aspects
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                blood pressure,blood volume,cardiac index,fluid,haemorrhage,shock,venesection

                Comments

                Comment on this article