19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The burden of congenital rubella syndrome in the Philippines: results from a retrospective assessment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          In line with the regional aim of eliminating rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), phased introduction of rubella-containing vaccines (RCV) in the Philippines’ routine immunization programme began in 2010. We estimated the burden of CRS in the country before widespread nationwide programmatic RCV use.

          Methods

          We performed a retrospective chart review in four tertiary hospitals. Children born between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 and identified as possible CRS cases based on the presence of one or more potential manifestations of CRS documented in hospital or clinic charts were reviewed. Cases that met the clinical case definition of CRS were classified as either confirmed (with laboratory confirmation) or probable (without laboratory confirmation). Cases that did not fulfil the criteria for either confirmed or probable CRS were excluded from the analysis.

          Results

          We identified 18 confirmed and 201 probable cases in this review. Depending on the hospital, the estimated incidence of CRS ranged from 30 to 233 cases per 100 000 live births. The estimated national burden of CRS was 20 to 31 cases per 100 000 annually.

          Discussion

          This is the first attempt to assess the national CRS burden using in-country hospital data in the Philippines. Prospective surveillance for CRS and further strengthening of the ongoing measles-rubella surveillance are necessary to establish accurate estimates of the burden of CRS and the impact of programmatic RCV use in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Rubella vaccines: WHO position paper.

          (2011)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review

            Background The burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) is typically underestimated in routine surveillance. Updated estimates are needed following the recent WHO position paper on rubella and recent GAVI initiatives, funding rubella vaccination in eligible countries. Previous estimates considered the year 1996 and only 78 (developing) countries. Methods We reviewed the literature to identify rubella seroprevalence studies conducted before countries introduced rubella-containing vaccination (RCV). These data and the estimated vaccination coverage in the routine schedule and mass campaigns were incorporated in mathematical models to estimate the CRS incidence in 1996 and 2000–2010 for each country, region and globally. Results The estimated CRS decreased in the three regions (Americas, Europe and Eastern Mediterranean) which had introduced widespread RCV by 2010, reaching <2 per 100,000 live births (the Americas and Europe) and 25 (95% CI 4–61) per 100,000 live births (the Eastern Mediterranean). The estimated incidence in 2010 ranged from 90 (95% CI: 46–195) in the Western Pacific, excluding China, to 116 (95% CI: 56–235) and 121 (95% CI: 31–238) per 100,000 live births in Africa and SE Asia respectively. Highest numbers of cases were predicted in Africa (39,000, 95% CI: 18,000–80,000) and SE Asia (49,000, 95% CI: 11,000–97,000). In 2010, 105,000 (95% CI: 54,000–158,000) CRS cases were estimated globally, compared to 119,000 (95% CI: 72,000–169,000) in 1996. Conclusions Whilst falling dramatically in the Americas, Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean after vaccination, the estimated CRS incidence remains high elsewhere. Well-conducted seroprevalence studies can help to improve the reliability of these estimates and monitor the impact of rubella vaccination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vaccination against rubella and measles: quantitative investigations of different policies.

              This paper uses relatively simple and deterministic mathematical models to examine the impact that different immunization policies have on the age-specific incidence of rubella and measles. Following earlier work by Knox (1980) and others, we show that immunization programmes can, under some circumstances, increase the total number of cases among older age groups; the implications for the overall incidence of measles encephalitis and of congenital rubella syndrome are examined, paying attention both to the eventual equilibrium and to the short-term effect in the first few decades after immunization is initiated. Throughout, we use data (from the U.K., and U.S.A. and other countries) both in the estimation of the epidemiological parameters in our models, and in comparison between theoretical predictions and observed facts. The conclusions defy brief summary and are set out at the end of the paper.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Western Pac Surveill Response J
                Western Pac Surveill Response J
                WPSAR
                Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal : WPSAR
                World Health Organization
                2094-7321
                2094-7313
                Apr-Jun 2017
                13 June 2017
                : 8
                : 2
                : 17-24
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines.
                [b ]Philippine Children’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
                [c ]Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines.
                [d ]Department of Pediatrics, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, Cebu City, Philippines.
                [e ]Department of Pediatrics, Southern Philippines Medical Center, Davao City, Philippines.
                [f ]Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines.
                [g ]World Health Organization Representative’s Office, Manila, Philippines.
                [h ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global Immunization Division, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
                [i ]Department of Health, Philippines.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Anna Lena Lopez (email: annalenalopez@ 123456gmail.com )
                Article
                wpsar.2017.8.2.017
                10.5365/wpsar.2017.8.1.006
                5695426
                29184700
                64f19fa7-6ff1-4cdc-84e0-47d3231a8d3e
                (c) 2017 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.

                History
                Categories
                Non Theme Issue
                Original Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content616

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors180