1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tracking the global application of conservation translocation and social attraction to reverse seabird declines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Tracking evidence of species restoration can improve best practices and management outcomes. Seabirds are globally threatened and respond positively to restoration, particularly on islands where threats can be mitigated at landscape scales. We developed the Seabird Restoration Database—a compendium of translocation and social attraction efforts systematically synthesized from nearly 1,400 resources and over 300 experts to inform seabird restoration best practices. The database includes 851 events targeting 138 species in 551 locations and 36 countries. Outcomes varied by taxonomy and were positive: 80% of events resulted in visitation and 76% achieved breeding, within 2 y of implementation on average. These outcomes demonstrate the efficacy of restoration actions for recovering seabird populations and the database provides a baseline for tracking conservation progress.

          Abstract

          The global loss of biodiversity has inspired actions to restore nature across the planet. Translocation and social attraction actions deliberately move or lure a target species to a restoration site to reintroduce or augment populations and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. Given limited conservation funding and rapidly accelerating extinction trajectories, tracking progress of these interventions can inform best practices and advance management outcomes. Seabirds are globally threatened and commonly targeted for translocation and social attraction (“active seabird restoration”), yet no framework exists for tracking these efforts nor informing best practices. This study addresses this gap for conservation decision makers responsible for seabirds and coastal management. We systematically reviewed active seabird restoration projects worldwide and collated results into a publicly accessible Seabird Restoration Database. We describe global restoration trends, apply a systematic process to measure success rates and response times since implementation, and examine global factors influencing outcomes. The database contains 851 active restoration events in 551 locations targeting 138 seabird species; 16% of events targeted globally threatened taxa. Visitation occurred in 80% of events and breeding occurred in 76%, on average 2 y after implementation began (SD = 3.2 y). Outcomes varied by taxonomy, with the highest and quickest breeding response rates for Charadriiformes (terns, gulls, and auks), primarily with social attraction. Given delayed and variable response times to active restoration, 5 y is appropriate before evaluating outcomes. The database and results serve as a model for tracking and evaluating restoration outcomes, and is applicable to measuring conservation interventions for additional threatened taxa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Defaunation in the Anthropocene.

          We live amid a global wave of anthropogenically driven biodiversity loss: species and population extirpations and, critically, declines in local species abundance. Particularly, human impacts on animal biodiversity are an under-recognized form of global environmental change. Among terrestrial vertebrates, 322 species have become extinct since 1500, and populations of the remaining species show 25% average decline in abundance. Invertebrate patterns are equally dire: 67% of monitored populations show 45% mean abundance decline. Such animal declines will cascade onto ecosystem functioning and human well-being. Much remains unknown about this "Anthropocene defaunation"; these knowledge gaps hinder our capacity to predict and limit defaunation impacts. Clearly, however, defaunation is both a pervasive component of the planet's sixth mass extinction and also a major driver of global ecological change. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The need for evidence-based conservation.

            Much of current conservation practice is based upon anecdote and myth rather than upon the systematic appraisal of the evidence, including experience of others who have tackled the same problem. We suggest that this is a major problem for conservationists and requires a rethinking of the manner in which conservation operates. There is an urgent need for mechanisms that review available information and make recommendations to practitioners. We suggest a format for web-based databases that could provide the required information in accessible form.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines

              The strong focus on species extinctions, a critical aspect of the contemporary pulse of biological extinction, leads to a common misimpression that Earth’s biota is not immediately threatened, just slowly entering an episode of major biodiversity loss. This view overlooks the current trends of population declines and extinctions. Using a sample of 27,600 terrestrial vertebrate species, and a more detailed analysis of 177 mammal species, we show the extremely high degree of population decay in vertebrates, even in common “species of low concern.” Dwindling population sizes and range shrinkages amount to a massive anthropogenic erosion of biodiversity and of the ecosystem services essential to civilization. This “biological annihilation” underlines the seriousness for humanity of Earth’s ongoing sixth mass extinction event. The population extinction pulse we describe here shows, from a quantitative viewpoint, that Earth’s sixth mass extinction is more severe than perceived when looking exclusively at species extinctions. Therefore, humanity needs to address anthropogenic population extirpation and decimation immediately. That conclusion is based on analyses of the numbers and degrees of range contraction (indicative of population shrinkage and/or population extinctions according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature) using a sample of 27,600 vertebrate species, and on a more detailed analysis documenting the population extinctions between 1900 and 2015 in 177 mammal species. We find that the rate of population loss in terrestrial vertebrates is extremely high—even in “species of low concern.” In our sample, comprising nearly half of known vertebrate species, 32% (8,851/27,600) are decreasing; that is, they have decreased in population size and range. In the 177 mammals for which we have detailed data, all have lost 30% or more of their geographic ranges and more than 40% of the species have experienced severe population declines (>80% range shrinkage). Our data indicate that beyond global species extinctions Earth is experiencing a huge episode of population declines and extirpations, which will have negative cascading consequences on ecosystem functioning and services vital to sustaining civilization. We describe this as a “biological annihilation” to highlight the current magnitude of Earth’s ongoing sixth major extinction event.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                10 April 2023
                18 April 2023
                10 October 2023
                : 120
                : 16
                : e2214574120
                Affiliations
                [1] aPacific Rim Conservation , Honolulu, HI 96839
                [2] bThe Nature Conservancy , Santa Cruz, CA 95060
                [3] cDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University , DeKalb, IL 60115
                [4] dInstitute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University , DeKalb, IL 60115
                [5] eNational Audubon Society, Seabird Institute , Bremen, ME 04551
                [6] fCornell Lab of Ornithology , Ithaca, NY 14850
                [7] gMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa , Wellington, NZ 6140
                [8] hNew Zealand Department of Conservation , Wellington, NZ 6140
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: dena@ 123456pacificrimconservation.org .

                Edited by Marissa L. Baskett, University of California Davis, Davis, CA; received August 24, 2022; accepted March 6, 2023 by Editorial Board Member Alan Hastings

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-0652
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-6676
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5512-9958
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-1767
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-9261
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-4889
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8789-3208
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-4980
                Article
                202214574
                10.1073/pnas.2214574120
                10120044
                37036988
                64fda41b-1489-448d-bf59-dacb1e7cf6ef
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 24 August 2022
                : 06 March 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 8, Words: 5355
                Funding
                Funded by: David and Lucile Packard Foundation (PF), FundRef 100000008;
                Award ID: 2019-68989
                Award Recipient : Dena R Spatz Award Recipient : Lindsay C Young Award Recipient : Nick D Holmes Award Recipient : Holly P Jones Award Recipient : Eric A VanderWerf Award Recipient : Donald E Lyons
                Funded by: Nature Conservancy (TNC), FundRef 100014596;
                Award ID: 11192020-14624 - Sub-Agt-030521-14273
                Award Recipient : Dena R Spatz
                Categories
                research-article, Research Article
                env-sci-bio, Environmental Sciences
                sustainability-bio, Sustainability Science
                417
                9
                Biological Sciences
                Environmental Sciences
                Biological Sciences
                Sustainability Science

                seabird,translocation,social attraction,restoration,data synthesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article