6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spatial separation of phosphatase and kinase activity within the Bub complex is required for proper mitosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The Bub1 and BubR1 kinetochore proteins support proper chromosome segregation and mitotic checkpoint activity. Bub1 and BubR1 are paralogs with Bub1 being a kinase, while BubR1 localizes the PP2A-B56 protein phosphatase to kinetochores in humans. Whether this spatial separation of kinase and phosphatase activity is important is unclear as some organisms integrate both activities into one Bub protein. Here, we engineer human Bub1 and BubR1 proteins integrating kinase and phosphatase activities into one protein and show that these do not support normal mitotic progression. A Bub1–PP2A-B56 complex can support chromosome alignment but results in impairment of the checkpoint due to dephosphorylation of the Mad1 binding site in Bub1. Furthermore, a chimeric BubR1 protein containing the Bub1 kinase domain induces delocalized H2ApT120 phosphorylation, resulting in the reduction of centromeric hSgo2 and chromosome segregation errors. Collectively, these results argue that the spatial separation of kinase and phosphatase activities within the Bub complex is required for balancing its functions in the checkpoint and chromosome alignment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Molecular Biology of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Dynamics.

          The spindle assembly checkpoint is a safeguard mechanism that coordinates cell-cycle progression during mitosis with the state of chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle. The checkpoint prevents mitotic cells from exiting mitosis in the presence of unattached or improperly attached chromosomes, thus avoiding whole-chromosome gains or losses and their detrimental effects on cell physiology. Here, I review a considerable body of recent progress in the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying checkpoint signaling, and identify a number of unresolved questions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2

            The mitotic checkpoint prevents cells with unaligned chromosomes from prematurely exiting mitosis by inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) from targeting key proteins for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. We have examined the mechanism by which the checkpoint inhibits the APC/C by purifying an APC/C inhibitory factor from HeLa cells. We call this factor the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) as it consists of hBUBR1, hBUB3, CDC20, and MAD2 checkpoint proteins in near equal stoichiometry. MCC inhibitory activity is 3,000-fold greater than that of recombinant MAD2, which has also been shown to inhibit APC/C in vitro. Surprisingly, MCC is not generated from kinetochores, as it is also present and active in interphase cells. However, only APC/C isolated from mitotic cells was sensitive to inhibition by MCC. We found that the majority of the APC/C in mitotic lysates is associated with the MCC, and this likely contributes to the lag in ubiquitin ligase activity. Importantly, chromosomes can suppress the reactivation of APC/C. Chromosomes did not affect the inhibitory activity of MCC or the stimulatory activity of CDC20. We propose that the preformed interphase pool of MCC allows for rapid inhibition of APC/C when cells enter mitosis. Unattached kinetochores then target the APC/C for sustained inhibition by the MCC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The spindle assembly checkpoint.

              During mitosis and meiosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint acts to maintain genome stability by delaying cell division until accurate chromosome segregation can be guaranteed. Accuracy requires that chromosomes become correctly attached to the microtubule spindle apparatus via their kinetochores. When not correctly attached to the spindle, kinetochores activate the spindle assembly checkpoint network, which in turn blocks cell cycle progression. Once all kinetochores become stably attached to the spindle, the checkpoint is inactivated, which alleviates the cell cycle block and thus allows chromosome segregation and cell division to proceed. Here we review recent progress in our understanding of how the checkpoint signal is generated, how it blocks cell cycle progression and how it is extinguished. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                J Mol Cell Biol
                J Mol Cell Biol
                jmcb
                Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
                Oxford University Press
                1674-2788
                1759-4685
                November 2022
                28 November 2022
                28 November 2022
                : 14
                : 11
                : mjac062
                Affiliations
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark
                Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                The Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Basic Medical College, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou 310029, China
                Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark
                The Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University , Qingdao 266061, China
                Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Gang Zhang, E-mail: zhanggang_sma@ 123456qdu.edu.cn
                Correspondence to: Jakob Nilsson, E-mail: jakob.nilsson@ 123456cpr.ku.dk

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-7203
                Article
                mjac062
                10.1093/jmcb/mjac062
                10155811
                36441015
                653f8cce-4f52-4e77-9ac4-6f529583f03e
                © The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, CEMCS, CAS.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 November 2022
                : 28 April 2022
                : 29 July 2022
                : 03 May 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, DOI 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 31970666
                Funded by: Taishan Scholar Project;
                Award ID: tsqn201812054
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100009708;
                Award ID: NNF14CC0001
                Funded by: Danish Cancer Society, DOI 10.13039/100008363;
                Award ID: R269-A15586-B17
                Funded by: Independent Research Fund Denmark, DOI 10.13039/501100004836;
                Award ID: 8021-00101B
                Award ID: 0134-00199B
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100009708;
                Award ID: NNF20OC0065098
                Categories
                Article
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01180

                mitosis,spindle assembly checkpoint,kinetochores,bub1,bubr1,pp2a/b56

                Comments

                Comment on this article