4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      No gas source, no problem: Proximity to pre‐existing embolism and segmentation affect embolism spreading in angiosperm xylem by gas diffusion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

          Fiji is a distribution of the popular open-source software ImageJ focused on biological-image analysis. Fiji uses modern software engineering practices to combine powerful software libraries with a broad range of scripting languages to enable rapid prototyping of image-processing algorithms. Fiji facilitates the transformation of new algorithms into ImageJ plugins that can be shared with end users through an integrated update system. We propose Fiji as a platform for productive collaboration between computer science and biology research communities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency.

              We tested the hypothesis that greater cavitation resistance correlates with less total inter-vessel pit area per vessel (the pit area hypothesis) and evaluated a trade-off between cavitation safety and transport efficiency. Fourteen species of diverse growth form (vine, ring- and diffuse-porous tree, shrub) and family affinity were added to published data predominately from the Rosaceae (29 species total). Two types of vulnerability-to-cavitation curves were found. Ring-porous trees and vines showed an abrupt drop in hydraulic conductivity with increasing negative pressure, whereas hydraulic conductivity in diffuse-porous species generally decreased gradually. The ring-porous type curve was not an artifact of the centrifuge method because it was obtained also with the air-injection technique. A safety versus efficiency trade-off was evident when curves were compared across species: for a given pressure, there was a limited range of optimal vulnerability curves. The pit area hypothesis was supported by a strong relationship (r2 = 0.77) between increasing cavitation resistance and diminishing pit membrane area per vessel (A(P)). Small A(P) was associated with small vessel surface area and hence narrow vessel diameter (D) and short vessel length (L)--consistent with an increase in vessel flow resistance with cavitation resistance. This trade-off was amplified at the tissue level by an increase in xylem/vessel area ratio with cavitation resistance. Ring-porous species were more efficient than diffuse-porous species on a vessel basis but not on a xylem basis owing to higher xylem/vessel area ratios in ring-porous anatomy. Across four orders of magnitude, lumen and end-wall resistivities maintained a relatively tight proportionality with a near-optimal mean of 56% of the total vessel resistivity residing in the end-wall. This was consistent with an underlying scaling of L to D(3/2) across species. Pit flow resistance did not increase with cavitation safety, suggesting that cavitation pressure was not related to mean pit membrane porosity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Plant, Cell & Environment
                Plant Cell Environ
                Wiley
                0140-7791
                1365-3040
                May 2021
                February 18 2021
                May 2021
                : 44
                : 5
                : 1329-1345
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology Ulm University Ulm Germany
                [2 ]Laboratory of Plant Physiology “Coaracy M. Franco” Center R&D in Ecophysiology and Biophysics, Agronomic Institute (IAC) Campinas Brazil
                [3 ]Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Department of Plant Biology Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Campinas Brazil
                [4 ]Purdue Center for Plant Biology, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
                [5 ]Plant Ecophysiology and Evolution Group, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilisation of Subtropical Agro‐Bioresources Guangxi University Nanning China
                [6 ]Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation College of Forestry, Guangxi University Nanning China
                Article
                10.1111/pce.14016
                33529382
                658f2c66-0de2-410e-b3bc-e6b4ff42ff8d
                © 2021

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article