2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A weapons–testes trade-off in males is amplified in female traits

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sexually selected weapons are assumed to trade off with traits related to ejaculates, such as testes. However, remarkably little is known about what governs resource allocation and why trade-offs are found in some cases and not others. Often-used models depict competitive allocation occurring within the functional grouping of traits (e.g. reproduction); however, other factors including tissue expense and developmental timing may influence allocation. Experimental comparisons of investment across the sexes have the potential to illuminate allocation rules, because the sexes do not always use traits for the same functions. Here, we capitalize upon a species where females have weapons–testes homologues. We report that a documented trade-off in investment between hind-limb weapons and testes in leaf-footed cactus bugs, Narnia femorata , is even more pronounced in female hind limbs and ovaries. Female hind limbs in this species do not share the clear reproductive function of male hind limbs; therefore, this trade-off spans trait functional groups. Such patterns of investment suggest that future studies of reproductive trade-offs should consider factors such as tissue expense and developmental timing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Acquisition and Allocation of Resources: Their Influence on Variation in Life History Tactics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology

            In the face of continuous threats from parasites, hosts have evolved an elaborate series of preventative and controlling measures - the immune system - in order to reduce the fitness costs of parasitism. However, these measures do have associated costs. Viewing an individual's immune response to parasites as being subject to optimization in the face of other demands offers potential insights into mechanisms of life history trade-offs, sexual selection, parasite-mediated selection and population dynamics. We discuss some recent results that have been obtained by practitioners of this approach in natural and semi-natural populations, and suggest some ways in which this field may progress in the near future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B.
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                August 14 2019
                July 31 2019
                August 14 2019
                : 286
                : 1908
                : 20190906
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
                [2 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
                [3 ]Department of Biology, University of Florida, 876 Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2019.0906
                6710601
                31362640
                6761c7af-14fb-4cb3-98bf-2088a77e31f5
                © 2019

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article