13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epoetin Biosimilars in the Treatment of Renal Anemia: What Have We Learned from a Decade of European Experience?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biosimilars are biological medicines that are approved via stringently defined regulatory pathways on the basis that comparable safety, efficacy, and quality have been demonstrated to their reference medicine. The advantage of biosimilar drugs is that they may be less expensive than the reference medicine, allowing for greater patient access and cost savings in already stretched healthcare budgets. Biosimilar epoetins have been available in Europe for a decade. Complementing in vitro and preclinical characterization, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, clinical trials provided the additional data needed to reassure European authorities that biosimilar epoetins were sufficiently similar to the reference epoetin to warrant approval. Post-approval, real-world studies have provided further evidence that biosimilar epoetins are an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of renal anemia, with ongoing pharmacovigilance and observational studies monitoring for any unexpected long-term signals that have not been identified in clinical development studies. As the evidence and experience with these products increase, many of the initial concerns are being alleviated. Nephrologists can be increasingly confident that European Medicines Agency-approved biosimilars offer high-quality, affordable, effective alternatives to existing reference medicines used to treat renal anemia, and may help yield cost savings and improve patient access.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biosimilars: what clinicians should know.

          Biosimilar medicinal products (biosimilars) have become a reality in the European Union and will soon be available in the United States. Despite an established legal pathway for biosimilars in the European Union since 2005 and increasing and detailed regulatory guidance on data requirements for their development and licensing, many clinicians, particularly oncologists, are reluctant to consider biosimilars as a treatment option for their patients. Major concerns voiced about biosimilars relate to their pharmaceutical quality, safety (especially immunogenicity), efficacy (particularly in extrapolated indications), and interchangeability with the originator product. In this article, the members and experts of the Working Party on Similar Biologic Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) address these issues. A clear understanding of the scientific principles of the biosimilar concept and access to unbiased information on licensed biosimilars are important for physicians to make informed and appropriate treatment choices for their patients. This will become even more important with the advent of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies. The issues also highlight the need for improved communication between physicians, learned societies, and regulators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The state of the art in the development of biosimilars.

            The development of biologic therapeutics using advanced technology to copy and improve on nature's design of complex peptides, proteins, and glycoproteins has enabled the treatment of diseases in entirely new ways and brought unique and lifesaving treatments to many people. However, at least in part because of cost pressures, access to these truly amazing products has not been uniformly available; many patients do not qualify for these treatments, or the treatment is postponed until disabilities accumulate. The development of biosimilars--essentially copies of the original biologic drugs after patent expiration--allows for wider and, as important, earlier access to these agents because of their lower cost and consequently greater affordability. The development and commercialization of biosimilars can help address unmet medical needs by improving access to well-established therapeutic interventions while improving health-care affordability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cross-sectional survey in CKD patients across Europe describing the association between quality of life and anaemia

              Background Deteriorating renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is commonly associated with reduced haemoglobin levels, adding to the already considerable humanistic burden of CKD. This analysis evaluated the impact of anaemia on disease burden in patients with CKD stages 3–4, and in those on dialysis. Methods This was a descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of European data from an Adelphi CKD Disease-Specific Programme. This programme collected data from patients and their treating nephrologists/endocrinologists; patient- and physician-reported data were matched for each patient. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data were obtained through patient completion of the EQ-5D, SF-12 and KDQOL-36. Additional information was obtained via physician reporting of patient symptoms, and patients’ reports of impaired activity. Anaemia was defined by haemoglobin level and/or current use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Results Significant, but modest Spearman’s rank correlations were observed between haemoglobin levels and extent of HRQoL impairment, regardless of instrument used (range 0.19–0.23; all P-values < 0.0001). When stratified by anaemia status, impairment was consistently lower for anaemic than non-anaemic CKD patients across measurement scales (e.g. EQ-5D index value [standard deviation {SD}] 0.72 [0.31] vs 0.83 [0.23], respectively; P < 0.0001). Physician-reported patient tiredness was associated with increased disease burden at all levels of CKD studied (total EQ-5D index value [SD] in patients reporting no tiredness vs tiredness 0.81 [0.26] vs 0.70 [0.30] respectively; P < 0.0001) with P < 0.0001 for no tiredness vs tiredness at all stages of CKD. The presence of anaemia was associated with impaired activity levels at CKD stages 3 (37.5 % vs 28.4 %, respectively; P = 0.0044) and 4 (48.1 % vs 39.9 %, respectively; P = 0.0292), and in patients on dialysis (52.0 % vs 45.0 %, respectively; P = 0.0732). Conclusions The analysis found that CKD patients with anaemia typically had a lower HRQoL than those without anaemia. The impairment correlated with anaemia was more apparent in non-dialysis patients with CKD stages 3 or 4 than in those receiving dialysis. Coexisting CKD and anaemia may have an impact on patient HRQoL similar to other chronic conditions such as diabetes, epilepsy or certain forms of cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0312-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 8024 4764855 , andriy.krendyukov@sandoz.com
                Journal
                Clin Drug Investig
                Clin Drug Investig
                Clinical Drug Investigation
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1173-2563
                1179-1918
                2 March 2018
                2 March 2018
                2018
                : 38
                : 6
                : 481-490
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
                [2 ]MVZ Davita Rhein-Ruhr, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [3 ]Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Sandoz International GmbH, Kundl, Austria
                [4 ]GRID grid.476364.4, Hematology/Nephrology, , Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, ; Industriestr. 25, 83607 Holzkirchen, Germany
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0593 7118, GRID grid.42399.35, Service de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèse, , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, ; Bordeaux, France
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2106 639X, GRID grid.412041.2, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, ; Bordeaux, France
                Article
                637
                10.1007/s40261-018-0637-1
                5951862
                29500617
                678e69fc-f117-4f40-beb1-4c69ef8c1709
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Current Opinion
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article