15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Are Atheists Implicit Theists?

      1 , 2 , 3
      Journal of Cognition and Culture
      Brill

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Cognitive Science of Religion commonly advances the view that religious beliefs emerge naturally via specific cognitive biases without cultural influence. From this perspective comes the claim that self-proclaimed atheists harbour traces of supernatural thinking. By exploring the potential influence of the cultural learning mechanism Credibility Enhancing Displays ( creds), which affirms beliefs, current disparities between studies involved in priming the implicit theism of atheists, might be reconciled. Eighty-eight university students were randomly assigned to either a religious or control prime condition. A dictator game was completed to obtain an indication of pro-social behaviour ( psb). Lifetime theists reported significantly higher religious creds exposure levels than lifetime atheists, though not convert atheists. Conversely, lifetime atheists reported significantly lower creds exposure scores than convert atheists. Convert atheists in the prime condition were significantly more pro-social than lifetime atheists. Additionally, higher scores on the creds exposure measure equated to higher psb in the religious condition than the control condition. The results are consistent with the view that supernatural belief formation is an interactive process between both context and content biases, and that in order to accurately test for implicit theism, past personal differences in exposure to religious creds should be considered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.

          We present two studies aimed at resolving experimentally whether religion increases prosocial behavior in the anonymous dictator game. Subjects allocated more money to anonymous strangers when God concepts were implicitly activated than when neutral or no concepts were activated. This effect was at least as large as that obtained when concepts associated with secular moral institutions were primed. A trait measure of self-reported religiosity did not seem to be associated with prosocial behavior. We discuss different possible mechanisms that may underlie this effect, focusing on the hypotheses that the religious prime had an ideomotor effect on generosity or that it activated a felt presence of supernatural watchers. We then discuss implications for theories positing religion as a facilitator of the emergence of early large-scale societies of cooperators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nobody's watching?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Cognition and Culture
                J Cogn Cult
                Brill
                1567-7095
                1568-5373
                February 8 2017
                February 8 2017
                : 17
                : 1-2
                : 27-50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Macquarie UniversitySydney, nsw 2109Australia
                [2 ] * Corresponding author, e-mail: colin.wastell@mq.edu.au
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW 2109Australia
                Article
                10.1163/15685373-12342190
                67cfbda2-c01c-4bfa-8567-59f778c4b984
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article