4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Associations of Preoperative Patient Mental Health and Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics With Baseline Pain, Function, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Shoulder pain and dysfunction are common indications for rotator cuff repair surgery, yet the factors that are associated with these symptoms are not fully understood.

          Purpose/Hypothesis:

          This study aimed to investigate the associations of patient and disease-specific factors with baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that tear size and mental health status, as assessed by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey mental component score (VR-12 MCS), would be associated with baseline total Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) and its pain, function, and satisfaction subscale scores.

          Study Design:

          Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

          Methods:

          We prospectively identified 12 patient factors and 12 disease-specific factors as possible statistical predictors for baseline PROMs in patients undergoing surgical repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tears at a single institution over a 3-year period. Multivariable statistical modeling and Akaike information criterion comparisons were used to investigate the unique associations with, and relative importance of, these factors in accounting for variation in baseline PSS and its subscale scores.

          Results:

          A total of 1442 patients who had undergone surgery by 23 surgeons met inclusion criteria, with a baseline median total PSS of 38.5 (pain, 12; function, 24.2; satisfaction, 2). Adjusted R 2 in multivariable models demonstrated that the 24 general patient and disease-specific factors accounted for 22% to 24% of the variability in total PSS and its pain and function subscale scores. Large/massive tear size was significantly associated with worse PSS total score and function score but not pain or satisfaction scores. Lower VR-12 MCS was significantly associated with worse total PSS and all 3 subscale scores. Among other factors significantly associated with baseline PROMs were sex, race, preoperative opioid use, years of education, employment status, acromion status, and adhesive capsulitis. Lower VR-12 MCS, preoperative opioid use, female sex, and black race were the factors most strongly associated with baseline PROMs.

          Conclusion:

          Large/massive tear size, lower VR-12 MCS, and several additional patient and disease-specific factors are associated with baseline PROMs in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Further studies are needed to investigate whether these factors will also predict poor postoperative PROMs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          7609541
          467
          Am J Sports Med
          Am J Sports Med
          The American journal of sports medicine
          0363-5465
          1552-3365
          14 February 2020
          18 December 2019
          February 2020
          21 February 2020
          : 48
          : 2
          : 432-443
          Affiliations
          Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
          Author notes

          Sambit Sahoo, MD, PhD (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); Eric T. Ricchetti, MD (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); Alexander Zajichek, MS (Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); Cleveland Clinic Shoulder Group (Peter J. Evans, MD, Lutul D. Farrow, MD, Brett W. McCoy, MD, Morgan H. Jones, MD, Anthony A. Miniaci, MD, Vani J. Sabesan, MD, Mark S. Schickendantz, MD, William H. Seitz, MD, Kurt P. Spindler, MD, Kim L. Stearns, MD, Greg Strnad, MS [Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA], and Alparslan Turan, MD [Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA]); Vahid Entezari, MD, MMSc (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); Peter B. Imrey, PhD (Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); Joseph P. Iannotti, MD, PhD (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA); and Kathleen A. Derwin, PhD (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA).

          [* ]Address correspondence to Kathleen A. Derwin, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, ND20, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA ( derwink@ 123456ccf.org ).
          Article
          PMC7033571 PMC7033571 7033571 nihpa1559239
          10.1177/0363546519892570
          7033571
          31851536
          68261ff1-699a-48d3-ad24-e0a2b2053d46

          For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.

          History
          Categories
          Article

          PROMs,shoulder,rotator cuff repair,pain,function,satisfaction,Penn Shoulder Score,preoperative factors,multivariable model

          Comments

          Comment on this article