32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review aims to provide a comprehensive outlook on the sensory (visual and haptic) contributions to reaching and grasping. The focus is on studies in developing children, normal, and neuropsychological populations, and in sensory-deprived individuals. Studies have suggested a right-hand/left-hemisphere specialization for visually guided grasping and a left-hand/right-hemisphere specialization for haptically guided object recognition. This poses the interesting possibility that when vision is not available and grasping relies heavily on the haptic system, there is an advantage to use the left hand. We review the evidence for this possibility and dissect the unique contributions of the visual and haptic systems to grasping. We ultimately discuss how the integration of these two sensory modalities shape hand preference.

          Related collections

          Most cited references274

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

          Accumulating neuropsychological, electrophysiological and behavioural evidence suggests that the neural substrates of visual perception may be quite distinct from those underlying the visual control of actions. In other words, the set of object descriptions that permit identification and recognition may be computed independently of the set of descriptions that allow an observer to shape the hand appropriately to pick up an object. We propose that the ventral stream of projections from the striate cortex to the inferotemporal cortex plays the major role in the perceptual identification of objects, while the dorsal stream projecting from the striate cortex to the posterior parietal region mediates the required sensorimotor transformations for visually guided actions directed at such objects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation.

            Grasping requires coding of the object's intrinsic properties (size and shape), and the transformation of these properties into a pattern of distal (finger and wrist) movements. Computational models address this behavior through the interaction of perceptual and motor schemas. In monkeys, the transformation of an object's intrinsic properties into specific grips takes place in a circuit that is formed by the inferior parietal lobule and the inferior premotor area (area F5). Neurons in both these areas code size, shape and orientation of objects, and specific types of grip that are necessary to grasp them. Grasping movements are coded more globally in the inferior parietal lobule, whereas they are more segmented in area F5. In humans, neuropsychological studies of patients with lesions to the parietal lobule confirm that primitive shape characteristics of an object for grasping are analyzed in the parietal lobe, and also demonstrate that this 'pragmatic' analysis of objects is separated from the 'semantic' analysis performed in the temporal lobe.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition.

              Here we review recent findings that reveal the functional properties of extra-striate regions in the human visual cortex that are involved in the representation and perception of objects. We characterize both the invariant and non-invariant properties of these regions and we discuss the correlation between activation of these regions and recognition. Overall, these results indicate that the lateral occipital complex plays an important role in human object recognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 September 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 1403
                Affiliations
                The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge AB, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Miriam Ittyerah, Institute for Communicative and Cognitive Neurosciences, India

                Reviewed by: Luisa Sartori, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy; Michiel M. Spapé, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT-Aalto University, Finland

                *Correspondence: Kayla D. Stone, The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada, kayla.stone@ 123456uleth.ca

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01403
                4584943
                26441777
                693abaa0-4859-4f0f-8357-51dfa2f6b06d
                Copyright © 2015 Stone and Gonzalez.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 June 2015
                : 02 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 298, Pages: 18, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 10.13039/501100000038
                Award ID: 14367
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                visually guided,haptics,haptically guided,hand preference,handedness,sensorimotor integration,development,sensory deprivation

                Comments

                Comment on this article