11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does the RAAS play a role in loss of taste and smell during COVID-19 infections?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction The new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) coronavirus, known as SARS-CoV-2, has rapidly spread worldwide. Among its many symptoms, ageusia (loss of taste) and anosmia (loss of smell) are considered as hallmarks of infection [1]. Possible mechanisms for loss of smell and taste in the course of COVID-19 disease are being explored [2, 3] but no direct role of the Renin-Angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in anosmia and ageusia has been suggested until now. Here we raise a mechanistic hypothesis of unexplored functions of RAAS-associated peptidases in modulating senses of taste and smell and its relationship with chemosensory impairment during COVID-19. This mechanistic perspective has implications for personalized medicine and the pharmacogenomics of COVID-19 management. RAAS-associated peptidases as cellular coronaviruses receptors in humans Loss of taste (ageusia) and/or loss of smell (anosmia) have unusually emerged as the most specific symptoms in COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, often being the first or the lone differentiating clinical manifestation of infection by SARS-CoV-2 [1, 4]. During evolution, many coronaviruses have coopted components of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) as viral entry receptors [5]. SARS-CoV, the virus responsible for the global outbreak of SARS in 2003, and SARS-CoV-2, the viral etiology of the current COVID-19 pandemic, both use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as functional receptor for viral entry [6, 7]. Other coronaviruses such as hCoV-229E, which causes common cold, enter cells via aminopeptidase N (APN or CD13) ref. [8]. ACE2 and APN are both enzymes from RAAS, potentially pointing to this system as a direct contributor for infection and disease progression of coronaviruses in mammals. The RAAS (Fig. 1) is best known as an endocrine network that regulates arterial blood pressure and fluid balance homeostasis. It acts systemically through angiotensinogen-derived peptides in blood vessels of the heart and kidney. In brief, liver-produced angiotensinogen is converted into the peptide angiotensin-I (AngI) by the peptidase renin, produced by the kidney. AngI is then cleaved by ACE into AngII, which is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide. However, AngII has a truly short life as it is further converted by aminopeptidase A (APA) and aminopeptidase N (APN) into other metabolite peptides with different bioactivities. Besides these well-documented vascular effects, the RAAS is also known to participate in other complex biological phenomena, such as glucose metabolism, kidney homeostasis, and cancer-related angiogenesis [9–11]. ACE2 and APN, the cell-entry receptors for coronaviruses, are in fact membrane-bound peptidases responsible for processing of RAAS-related peptides, indicating a plausible involvement of this system in related symptoms of infection. Although these proteases have been found in lung, kidney, intestine, and other organs, their expression pattern in sensory tissues in correlation to virus infection is currently under evaluation to determine its potential effects in either oral or nasal epithelium and its role in taste and/or smell impairment during the pathogenesis of viral infection. Fig. 1 The canonical RAAS pathway. Simplified schematic representation of the RAAS. Light arrows represent secretion, dark arrows represent enzymatic reactions and lines represents bound to receptor. ACE: Angiotensin II Converting Enzyme, APA: aminopeptidase A, APN: aminopeptidase N, AT1R: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor, AT2R: Angiotensin II type 2 receptor, MasR: Mas receptor. Taste impairment mediated by SARS-CoV-2 infection: Is there a role for the RAAS? RAAS components are expressed in taste buds of mice and have been shown to modulate perception of salty and sweet flavors [12, 13]. In fact, ACE2 is found in human epithelial cells of the tongue, and its expression is downregulated by SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection [14, 15]. Although less frequently reported, oral chemosensory alterations are also present in hCoV-229E infection via APN receptor, suggesting a role of RAAS dysfunction in viral infection-related ageusia and dysgeusia [16]. Thus, we postulate that RAAS might be involved in loss of taste reported during coronaviruses infection course. Peptidases regulate metabolism of amino acids and flavor perception in food by releasing specific residues [17]. Distinct amino acids have specific flavors such as glutamate, well known for its umami taste and widespread used in food industry as a flavor additive (under the trade name “AJI-NO-MOTO” or “味の素”, “essence of taste”), and some L-amino acids with aromatic side chains, which trigger bitter taste [18, 19]. ACE2 and APN are, respectively, amino- and carboxypeptidases that promote proteolytic cleavage of proteins and peptides. These RAAS proteases expressed in tongue epithelium may promote activation of taste receptors by releasing residues and thus contributing to taste perception. Once coronaviruses binds to ACE2, they are internalized together into cells, reducing ACE2 availability in the cell membrane [20]. Therefore, ageusia and dysgeusia could perhaps reflect insufficient RAAS peptidase function at membrane due to receptor internalization by coronaviruses infection on taste buds (Fig. 2A). Thus, we reasoned that the proteolytic release of amino acids by RAAS peptidases might be an as yet unappreciated component of taste perception. Fig. 2 Local RAAS impairment leads to loss of taste and smell during COVID-19. A. Hypothesis schematic representation: Local RAAS in nasal and oral tissue drives loss of taste and smell after SARS-CoV-2 infection due to reduced protease activity. B Colocalization of APN (CD13) and gustducin. Confocal microscopy image of tongue shows co-localization of APN and gustducin. Some organs have a functional RAAS pathway, which works cooperatively with systemic RAAS to maintenance of body homeostasis [21]. For instance, local RAAS were reported for kidney, working as a paracrine control of salt absorption in glomerulus, whose damage contribute to the pathophysiology of hypertension and renal injury [22]. This also seems to be the case for flavor-perceiving tissues because all components of the pathway are expressed in taste buds, namely renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R), and ACE2 [13]. Notably, exogenous AngII suppresses salt and enhance sweet taste responses in mice through AT1R while pharmacological inhibition of AT1R suppresses the AngII effects on taste cells. This mechanism thereby contributes to reduced intake of salt and sugar, providing evidence of RAAS impact on taste sensitivity and food consumption [12]. Furthermore, a large study of self-reported chemosensory dysfunction during COVID-19 from Global Consortium for Chemosensory Research (GCCR) has recently highlighted salty and sweet flavor perception disturbances among the most reported taste-related impairments in SARS-CoV-2 infection, followed by the others [23]. Altogether, these data corroborate the existence of local RAAS pathway in flavor-perceiving tissues and their possible implication in the genesis of COVID-19 infection-related symptoms. Sweet and salty taste cells are central for energy intake and electrolytic homeostasis, respectively, and it is reasonable that it might have a rapid and regionalized intake control, managed by a local RAAS. Given that ACE2 receptors are expressed in other cell types, as umami, bitter and sour taste receptors, RAAS may also have unexplored roles in these other taste sensors. Likewise, APN is also expressed in mice tongue, co-localizing with G-α-gustducin (Fig. 2B), a G-protein associated with taste and gustatory transduction [24]. As coronaviruses hijack the mammalian cell machinery, other molecules involved in taste processing and signal transduction may be impaired in infected cells, leading to the ageusia and dysgeusia as the presenting and hallmark symptom reported by many COVID-19 patients. As a tantalizing final piece of evidence supporting the involvement of the RAAS in sensory disturbances, either loss or impairment of taste have been self-reported by some patients during use of angiotensin II receptor blockers or ACE inhibitors, in a dose-dependent manner [25–27]. One should note that, in usual clinical settings, those anti-hypertensive drugs are often under the molar concentrations required for effective peptidase inhibition in oral epithelial and in taste cells, which would explain this peculiar side-effect being reported only by some and not by most or all hypertensive patients receiving RAAS-modulating drugs. Sniffing out COVID-19: “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet” Far less is currently known about the role of the RAAS pathway in olfaction but RAAS enzymes are also expressed in murine and human olfactory epithelium [28, 29]. In both species, ACE2 was found in sustentacular cells, primarily associated with structural support, and in stem and perivascular cells [30]. In contrast, olfactory neurons do not seem to express the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 [30, 31]. Although a local RAAS has not as yet been described for olfactory epithelium, the presence of ACE2 in sustentacular cells would arguably favor of a mechanistic role of this system in the processing of odorant molecules. Enzymatic pre-processing of odorants did occur prior to olfactory recognition, as demonstrated to odorants with functional groups (such as aldehydes and esters) that are typically targeted by metabolic enzymes present in mucus. Post-processed metabolites stimulate other odorant receptors and modulate olfactory transmission [32]. Likewise, APN is also expressed and proteolytic active in nasal epithelium [33], directing us to the hypothesis that protease activity of ACE2 and/or APN might be relevant to chemosensory recognition by participating in odorant processing that precedes receptor recognition. Moreover, sustentacular cells have structural and protective roles on olfactory neurons similar to glial cells in central nervous system. They are tentatively responsible for damage prevention from hazardous molecules to neuronal olfactory cells. In fact, many odorants bound to odorant-binding proteins (OBP) in nasal mucus and are internalized by sustentacular cells, which mediates rapid clearance of molecules from olfactory neurons contact surface [34]. Intercellular communications between sustentacular and neuronal cells also regulate odor perception and their impairment could lead to sense disturbances [35, 36]. The infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in animal model results in loss of cilia in olfactory sensory neurons [31], what likely impairs processing and internalization of odorants as well as intercommunication between these two cell types. Lastly, reduction in odorant-OBP complexes uptake by infected nasal support cells could also trigger odorant receptors desensitization [37], ultimately resulting in anosmia observed in COVID-19 infected patients. SARS-CoV-2 pharmacogenomics and RAAS-related polymorphisms Is there a role for genetic background in modulating RAAS in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infections? If so, how is it connected to COVID-19 symptoms? Although sociodemographic data, age and comorbidities correlate with severity of disease, they are not sufficient to explain the high variability in clinical manifestation, outcomes and mortality rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These observations have raised an increasing interest in the role that certain host’s genetic backgrounds might play in this scenario [38]. In genomic association studies, two loci were related to morbidity of COVID-19 disease: the ABO gene locus, in chromosome 9, and the locus 3p21.31. The ABO gene locus was previously known as a source of pharmacogenomic variants correlated to ACE activity; most strikingly, now the exact same genetic locus has been implicated in increased respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients [39, 40]. Regarding polymorphisms in ACE2 gene itself, it is known that variants in this genetic locus promote pharmacogenetic modulation of ACE inhibitors response [41] and therefore they have now been under scrutiny as genetic susceptibility loci for COVID-19 outcomes [42]. One should note that the ACE2 locus is located at chromosome Xp22.2 and that, as an X-linked gene, its genetic polymorphisms will have dominant effects in men and may thereby contribute to clarify the increased prevalence of severe COVID-19 cases in male patients. As X-chromosome inactivations in women are mostly random, they might perhaps exert a protective role in target tissues from most severe forms of COVID-19. The new locus implicated in respiratory failure of new coronaviruses disease, located in the chromosome 3, comprises a Neanderthal-inherited region of human genome and was actually shown to be less frequent in the East Asia population [43]. Consistently, there is also a relevant ethnic difference in the prevalence of taste and smell disturbances as symptoms of COVID-19, which are clinically three times less common in East Asia [44]. Thus, one could speculate that this variance results from the differential genetic prevalence of this specific chromosomal region in 3p21, although such theory still remains to be proven. Lastly, the viral genome may be crucial for infection consequences, since the D614G variant of SARS-CoV-2 (the predominant strain in Europe) predisposes infected individuals to suffer from anosmia [45]. In this sense, genomic variants affecting RAAS gene expression or activity likely influences taste and smell sense impairment, although this hypothesis has not as yet been clinically confirmed. Thus, genetic background is relevant to personalized response to SARS-CoV-2 infections and treatment, and could be responsible for disparities observed in COVID-19 drug-repurposing investigational clinical trials [46, 47]. In sum, these data highlights the urgent need for detailed populational pharmacogenomic studies. Taste, smell in the setting of COVID-19: the current state of the medical science and knowledge gaps It is widely accepted that olfactory deficiency influences taste perception through damage in the retronasal olfactory contribution to flavor perception, but one could speculate that both likely occur under a common viral etiology. Data from GCCR report on oral and nasal sensory disturbances sought to minimize olfaction influence in taste report and actually suggested a degree of independence between these factors [23]. Consistently with a transient infective agent, COVID-19-related symptoms seems to last only few weeks, while only long-lasting olfactory disturbances were shown to have influence on taste sense [48]. Self-report of olfaction and gustatory disturbances facilitates populational data acquisition as shown by a smartphone application to symptoms report of non-hospitalized COVID-19-positive individuals [49]. Despite of the increased reach of internet-based platforms or population survey questionnaires, subjectivity of self-reporting may always lead to underestimation of symptoms prevalence [23]. As a matter of fact, when objective olfactory tests were applied, 98% of patients presented some degree of smell dysfunction against only ~60–80% reported by other subjective approaches [1, 50, 51]. Therefore, the application of objective tests to properly evaluate the extent of ageusia and anosmia in patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection is clearly desirable. The nasal and oral epithelia are the main gateways for respiratory virus infections. As receptors for coronaviruses such as ACE2 and APN are expressed in these sensory tissues, one could surmise that these pathogens indeed gain entry through certain nasal and oral cells and control the intrinsic mammalian cell machinery to produce viral particles, thereby altering the native physiology of chemosensory perception. This logical possibility is evidenced by high viral loads found in nasal cavity--which indicates site-specific viral replication in the anatomical site--that is further confirmed by the use of nasal swabs analysis as diagnostic tools [52]. Even if one cannot entirely rule out the contribution of local inflammation to sensory disturbances, unlike other viral infections, COVID-19 loss of taste and smell is rarely reported along with nasal congestion with no significant alterations in paranasal sinuses by computed tomography [23, 53], directing us to other causes than immunologic alterations in sensitive organs by inflammation. Animal models for coronaviruses infection have been particularly challenging, since infection in mice does not reliably mimic the clinical features often seen in humans. The emergence of transgenic mice expressing human (h)ACE2 and/or hAPN under species-specific promoters [54–56] may allow an improved understanding of viral pathogenesis. Golden Syrian hamsters were recently used as a trustworthy model to olfactory alterations, resembling partial recovery of olfactory epithelium in 14 days post-infection seen in patients [31]. The establishment of non-human primate animal models for SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease are in progress. These models can resemble respiratory failure and mucosal viral loads found in humans [57–59] and may be useful tools to explore smell and taste impairment, perhaps even more reliable than hACE2 transgenic mice. Considering limitations of each species in experimental design, all may be used to unravel the contribution of RAAS to chemosensory disturbances during coronaviral infection, perhaps in combination with classic food-aversion experimental models. Final remarks Several lines of evidence point to RAAS impairment as a central element in the pathophysiology of anosmia and ageusia during initial presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. The juxtaposition of a loco-regional functional RAAS system, with SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor expression in sensory organs, and the side-effects of RAAS inhibitors affecting gustatory senses present an interesting research paradigm to unveil the contribution of this ancient system to the pathogenesis of ageusia and anosmia caused by COVID-19 infection. A well-codified symptom-infection relationship will expedite management and isolation of infected people, particularly in developing countries lacking enough specific test capacity. While most patients seem to fully recover from respiratory COVID-19 infections, it remains too early to tell whether there are permanent effects on the precious human senses of taste and smell. Moreover, The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative [60], a joint effort that aim to determine genetic variants involved in response to infection and development of disease, will open a promising path to pharmacogenomic exploration of treatment and symptoms management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Considering the central influence of RAAS in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection, research focused on organ-specific consequences may be helpful to understand the disease course and hopefully lead to insights into the development of effective therapies and vaccines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

          Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) 18 years ago, a large number of SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) have been discovered in their natural reservoir host, bats 1–4 . Previous studies have shown that some bat SARSr-CoVs have the potential to infect humans 5–7 . Here we report the identification and characterization of a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which caused an epidemic of acute respiratory syndrome in humans in Wuhan, China. The epidemic, which started on 12 December 2019, had caused 2,794 laboratory-confirmed infections including 80 deaths by 26 January 2020. Full-length genome sequences were obtained from five patients at an early stage of the outbreak. The sequences are almost identical and share 79.6% sequence identity to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, we show that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus. Pairwise protein sequence analysis of seven conserved non-structural proteins domains show that this virus belongs to the species of SARSr-CoV. In addition, 2019-nCoV virus isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a critically ill patient could be neutralized by sera from several patients. Notably, we confirmed that 2019-nCoV uses the same cell entry receptor—angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2)—as SARS-CoV.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients

            To the Editor: The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic, which was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has been declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization, may progress to a pandemic associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. SARS-CoV-2 is genetically related to SARS-CoV, which caused a global epidemic with 8096 confirmed cases in more than 25 countries in 2002–2003. 1 The epidemic of SARS-CoV was successfully contained through public health interventions, including case detection and isolation. Transmission of SARS-CoV occurred mainly after days of illness 2 and was associated with modest viral loads in the respiratory tract early in the illness, with viral loads peaking approximately 10 days after symptom onset. 3 We monitored SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in upper respiratory specimens obtained from 18 patients (9 men and 9 women; median age, 59 years; range, 26 to 76) in Zhuhai, Guangdong, China, including 4 patients with secondary infections (1 of whom never had symptoms) within two family clusters (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). The patient who never had symptoms was a close contact of a patient with a known case and was therefore monitored. A total of 72 nasal swabs (sampled from the mid-turbinate and nasopharynx) (Figure 1A) and 72 throat swabs (Figure 1B) were analyzed, with 1 to 9 sequential samples obtained from each patient. Polyester flock swabs were used for all the patients. From January 7 through January 26, 2020, a total of 14 patients who had recently returned from Wuhan and had fever (≥37.3°C) received a diagnosis of Covid-19 (the illness caused by SARS-CoV-2) by means of reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay with primers and probes targeting the N and Orf1b genes of SARS-CoV-2; the assay was developed by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Samples were tested at the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Thirteen of 14 patients with imported cases had evidence of pneumonia on computed tomography (CT). None of them had visited the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan within 14 days before symptom onset. Patients E, I, and P required admission to intensive care units, whereas the others had mild-to-moderate illness. Secondary infections were detected in close contacts of Patients E, I, and P. Patient E worked in Wuhan and visited his wife (Patient L), mother (Patient D), and a friend (Patient Z) in Zhuhai on January 17. Symptoms developed in Patients L and D on January 20 and January 22, respectively, with viral RNA detected in their nasal and throat swabs soon after symptom onset. Patient Z reported no clinical symptoms, but his nasal swabs (cycle threshold [Ct] values, 22 to 28) and throat swabs (Ct values, 30 to 32) tested positive on days 7, 10, and 11 after contact. A CT scan of Patient Z that was obtained on February 6 was unremarkable. Patients I and P lived in Wuhan and visited their daughter (Patient H) in Zhuhai on January 11 when their symptoms first developed. Fever developed in Patient H on January 17, with viral RNA detected in nasal and throat swabs on day 1 after symptom onset. We analyzed the viral load in nasal and throat swabs obtained from the 17 symptomatic patients in relation to day of onset of any symptoms (Figure 1C). Higher viral loads (inversely related to Ct value) were detected soon after symptom onset, with higher viral loads detected in the nose than in the throat. Our analysis suggests that the viral nucleic acid shedding pattern of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 resembles that of patients with influenza 4 and appears different from that seen in patients infected with SARS-CoV. 3 The viral load that was detected in the asymptomatic patient was similar to that in the symptomatic patients, which suggests the transmission potential of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. These findings are in concordance with reports that transmission may occur early in the course of infection 5 and suggest that case detection and isolation may require strategies different from those required for the control of SARS-CoV. How SARS-CoV-2 viral load correlates with culturable virus needs to be determined. Identification of patients with few or no symptoms and with modest levels of detectable viral RNA in the oropharynx for at least 5 days suggests that we need better data to determine transmission dynamics and inform our screening practices.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus

              Spike (S) proteins of coronaviruses, including the coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), associate with cellular receptors to mediate infection of their target cells 1,2 . Here we identify a metallopeptidase, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) 3,4 , isolated from SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-permissive Vero E6 cells, that efficiently binds the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV S protein. We found that a soluble form of ACE2, but not of the related enzyme ACE1, blocked association of the S1 domain with Vero E6 cells. 293T cells transfected with ACE2, but not those transfected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 receptors, formed multinucleated syncytia with cells expressing S protein. Furthermore, SARS-CoV replicated efficiently on ACE2-transfected but not mock-transfected 293T cells. Finally, anti-ACE2 but not anti-ACE1 antibody blocked viral replication on Vero E6 cells. Together our data indicate that ACE2 is a functional receptor for SARS-CoV. Supplementary information The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature02145) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                giordano@iq.usp.br
                wadih.arap@rutgers.edu
                Journal
                Pharmacogenomics J
                Pharmacogenomics J
                The Pharmacogenomics Journal
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1470-269X
                1473-1150
                15 December 2020
                15 December 2020
                : 1-7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11899.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0722, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, , University of São Paulo, ; São Paulo, SP Brazil
                [2 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Department of Neurology, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.430387.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8796, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, , Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, ; Newark, NJ USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.430387.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8796, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, , Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, ; Newark, NJ USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-3130
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-6771
                Article
                202
                10.1038/s41397-020-00202-8
                7737200
                33323946
                69c19708-d78d-48bd-beab-4e5f9ee76750
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 July 2020
                : 17 November 2020
                : 19 November 2020
                Categories
                Perspective

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article