28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent studies have shown that prior knowledge about where, when, and who is going to talk improves speech intelligibility. How related attentional processes affect cognitive processing load has not been investigated yet. In the current study, three experiments investigated how the pupil dilation response is affected by prior knowledge of target speech location, target speech onset, and who is going to talk. A total of 56 young adults with normal hearing participated. They had to reproduce a target sentence presented to one ear while ignoring a distracting sentence simultaneously presented to the other ear. The two sentences were independently masked by fluctuating noise. Target location (left or right ear), speech onset, and talker variability were manipulated in separate experiments by keeping these features either fixed during an entire block or randomized over trials. Pupil responses were recorded during listening and performance was scored after recall. The results showed an improvement in performance when the location of the target speech was fixed instead of randomized. Additionally, location uncertainty increased the pupil dilation response, which suggests that prior knowledge of location reduces cognitive load. Interestingly, the observed pupil responses for each condition were consistent with subjective reports of listening effort. We conclude that communicating in a dynamic environment like a cocktail party (where participants in competing conversations move unpredictably) requires substantial listening effort because of the demands placed on attentional processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

          A load theory of attention in which distractor rejection depends on the level and type of load involved in current processing was tested. A series of experiments demonstrates that whereas high perceptual load reduces distractor interference, working memory load or dual-task coordination load increases distractor interference. These findings suggest 2 selective attention mechanisms: a perceptual selection mechanism serving to reduce distractor perception in situations of high perceptual load that exhaust perceptual capacity in processing relevant stimuli and a cognitive control mechanism that reduces interference from perceived distractors as long as cognitive control functions are available to maintain current priorities (low cognitive load). This theory resolves the long-standing early versus late selection debate and clarifies the role of cognitive control in selective attention. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Music training for the development of auditory skills.

              The effects of music training in relation to brain plasticity have caused excitement, evident from the popularity of books on this topic among scientists and the general public. Neuroscience research has shown that music training leads to changes throughout the auditory system that prime musicians for listening challenges beyond music processing. This effect of music training suggests that, akin to physical exercise and its impact on body fitness, music is a resource that tones the brain for auditory fitness. Therefore, the role of music in shaping individual development deserves consideration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                7900445
                4492
                Hear Res
                Hear. Res.
                Hearing research
                0378-5955
                1878-5891
                29 October 2015
                27 February 2015
                May 2015
                01 May 2016
                : 323
                : 81-90
                Affiliations
                [a ]Section Ear & Hearing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, Boston, USA
                [c ]Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. VUmc – Ear & Hearing, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 44 40900. t.koelewijn@ 123456vumc.nl (T. Koelewijn)
                Article
                NIHMS734121
                10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.004
                4632994
                25732724
                69c3c495-8068-4771-b541-3fa3a8f39285

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Audiology
                Audiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article