8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A cysteine protease isolated from the latex of Ficus microcarpa: purification and biochemical characterization.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A plant protease named microcarpain was purified from the latex of Ficus microcarpa by acetonic (20-40 % saturation) precipitation, Sephadex G-75 filtration, and Mono Q-Sefinose FF chromatography. The protease was purified with a yield of 9.25 % and a purification factor of 8. The molecular weight of the microcarpain was estimated to be 20 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The purified enzyme showed maximum activity at pH 8.0 and at a temperature of 70 °C. Proteolytic activity was strongly inhibited by dithio-bis-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), Hg(2+), and Cu(2+). The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified microcarpain "VPETVDWRSKGAV" showed high homology with a protease from Arabidopsis thaliana. Inhibition studies and N-terminal sequence classified the enzyme as a member of the cysteine peptidases family.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Appl Biochem Biotechnol
          Applied biochemistry and biotechnology
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1559-0291
          0273-2289
          Feb 2015
          : 175
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Laboratory of Enzyme Engineering and Microbiology, National School of Engineering of Sfax, University of Sfax, 1173-3038, Sfax, Tunisia, ibtissemhamzamnif@yahoo.com.
          Article
          10.1007/s12010-014-1376-2
          25424283
          6a431bf0-40de-4c74-a125-add3820ae3d0
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article