25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Development and testing of the codependency assessment tool

      , ,
      Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Codependency constitutes a significant health risk, particularly for women, because codependent women are often involved in abusive and potentially harmful relationships. Individuals who are identified as codependent can engage in therapy and gain knowledge and freedom from such relationships. However, there is no reliable and valid measure of codependency that is consistently used to identify these individuals. This article describes the development and testing of the Codependency Assessment Tool, a multivariate tool that conceptualizes codependency as a construct comprising five factors: (1) Other Focus/Self-Neglect, (2) Low Self-Worth, (3) Hiding Self, (4) Medical Problems, and (5) Family of Origin Issues. The instrument has excellent reliability and validity. Its test-retest reliabilities = .78 to .94; Cronbach's alpha = .78 to .91. Criterion validity was determined to be established by using known groups; construct validity was established by comparing the codependency dimensions with depression.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
          Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
          Elsevier BV
          08839417
          October 1998
          October 1998
          : 12
          : 5
          : 264-272
          Article
          10.1016/S0883-9417(98)80036-8
          9793213
          6a58f4a7-2f8c-4102-a751-6c4f29d9f5bc
          © 1998

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article