5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Immunological barriers to haematopoietic stem cell gene therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cell and gene therapies using haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) epitomize the transformative potential of regenerative medicine. Recent clinical successes for gene therapies involving autologous HSC transplantation (HSCT) demonstrate the potential of genetic engineering in this stem cell type for curing disease. With recent advances in CRISPR gene-editing technologies, methodologies for the ex vivo expansion of HSCs and non-genotoxic conditioning protocols, the range of clinical indications for HSC-based gene therapies is expected to significantly expand. However, substantial immunological challenges need to be overcome. These include pre-existing immunity to gene-therapy reagents, immune responses to neoantigens introduced into HSCs by genetic engineering, and unique challenges associated with next-generation and off-the-shelf HSC products. By synthesizing these factors in this Review, we hope to encourage more research to address the immunological issues associated with current and next-generation HSC-based gene therapies to help realize the full potential of this field.

          Abstract

          To realize the full potential of genetic engineering of haematopoietic stem cells for a broad range of clinical indications, substantial immunological challenges must be overcome. These include innate and adaptive immune responses to gene-therapy reagents and adaptive immune responses to neoantigens expressed by genetically engineered cells.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

          Functional elucidation of causal genetic variants and elements requires precise genome editing technologies. The type II prokaryotic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas adaptive immune system has been shown to facilitate RNA-guided site-specific DNA cleavage. We engineered two different type II CRISPR/Cas systems and demonstrate that Cas9 nucleases can be directed by short RNAs to induce precise cleavage at endogenous genomic loci in human and mouse cells. Cas9 can also be converted into a nicking enzyme to facilitate homology-directed repair with minimal mutagenic activity. Lastly, multiple guide sequences can be encoded into a single CRISPR array to enable simultaneous editing of several sites within the mammalian genome, demonstrating easy programmability and wide applicability of the RNA-guided nuclease technology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA

            Summary Most genetic variants that contribute to disease 1 are challenging to correct efficiently and without excess byproducts 2–5 . Here we describe prime editing, a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a catalytically impaired Cas9 fused to an engineered reverse transcriptase, programmed with a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that both specifies the target site and encodes the desired edit. We performed >175 edits in human cells including targeted insertions, deletions, and all 12 types of point mutations without requiring double-strand breaks or donor DNA templates. We applied prime editing in human cells to correct efficiently and with few byproducts the primary genetic causes of sickle cell disease (requiring a transversion in HBB) and Tay-Sachs disease (requiring a deletion in HEXA), to install a protective transversion in PRNP, and to precisely insert various tags and epitopes into target loci. Four human cell lines and primary post-mitotic mouse cortical neurons support prime editing with varying efficiencies. Prime editing shows higher or similar efficiency and fewer byproducts than homology-directed repair, complementary strengths and weaknesses compared to base editing, and much lower off-target editing than Cas9 nuclease at known Cas9 off-target sites. Prime editing substantially expands the scope and capabilities of genome editing, and in principle can correct up to 89% of known genetic variants associated with human diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                adam.wilkinson@imm.ox.ac.uk
                nakauchi@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Nat Rev Immunol
                Nat Rev Immunol
                Nature Reviews. Immunology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1474-1733
                1474-1741
                17 March 2022
                : 1-15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.168010.e, ISNI 0000000419368956, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, , Stanford University School of Medicine, ; Stanford, CA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.168010.e, ISNI 0000000419368956, Department of Genetics, , Stanford University School of Medicine, ; Stanford, CA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-6204
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-0151
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9841-6973
                Article
                698
                10.1038/s41577-022-00698-0
                8929255
                35301483
                6af22db7-0837-43ea-9e82-3509d3dc1a4a
                © Springer Nature Limited 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 16 February 2022
                Categories
                Review Article

                haematopoiesis,targeted gene repair,stem-cell research

                Comments

                Comment on this article