There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Estimation of statistical power in functional MRI (fMRI) requires knowledge of the
expected percent signal change between two conditions as well as estimates of the
variability in percent signal change. Variability can be divided into intra-subject
variability, reflecting noise within the time series, and inter-subject variability,
reflecting subject-to-subject differences in activation. The purpose of this study
was to obtain estimates of percent signal change and the two sources of variability
from fMRI data, and then use these parameter estimates in simulation experiments in
order to generate power curves. Of interest from these simulations were conclusions
concerning how many subjects are needed and how many time points within a scan are
optimal in an fMRI study of cognitive function. Intra-subject variability was estimated
from resting conditions, and inter-subject variability and percent signal change were
estimated from verbal working memory data. Simulations derived from these parameters
illustrate how percent signal change, intra- and inter-subject variability, and number
of time points affect power. An empirical test experiment, using fMRI data acquired
during somatosensory stimulation, showed good correspondence between the simulation-based
power predictions and the power observed within somatosensory regions of interest.
Our analyses suggested that for a liberal threshold of 0.05, about 12 subjects were
required to achieve 80% power at the single voxel level for typical activations. At
more realistic thresholds, that approach those used after correcting for multiple
comparisons, the number of subjects doubled to maintain this level of power.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.