5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current perspectives in robotic hernia repair

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The surgical treatment of hernias has developed throughout the evolution of surgery. The fascination with hernia surgery is in part driven by its prevalence and by the variety of treatment options. Minimally invasive hernia surgery has a goal of a robust repair with minimal complications, and new robotic techniques are being developed in complex abdominal wall hernias with promising results. This review focuses on inguinal, ventral, and incisional hernias and their outcomes with a discussion on the traditional open, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques. The prevalence of minimally invasive hernia surgery and its advantages are also outlined. We highlight our experience in these procedures, specifically robotic herniorrhaphy, as it pertains to ventral incisional and inguinal hernia repair. We conclude that the robotic platform is proving to be a benefit to hernia repair. Many studies are showing its feasibility and comparable results to standard laparoscopy, and some have shown improved results, including shorter hospital stay without significant increases in cost. The robotic option of hernia repair has resulted in an increase in minimally invasive hernia repair, a number that has remained stagnant for the last decade. With more surgeons gaining training and experience and greater availability of the robotic platform, we expect to see greater numbers of minimally invasive hernia repair.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The First Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

          Prof Dr Med Erich Mühe of Böblingen, Germany, performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy on September 12, 1985. The German Surgical Society rejected Mühe in 1986 after he reported that he had performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy, yet in 1992 he received their highest award, the German Surgical Society Anniversary Award. In 1990 in Atlanta, at the Society of American Gastrointestinal Surgeons (SAGES) Convention, Perissat, Berci, Cuschieri, Dubois, and Mouret were recognized by SAGES for performing early laparoscopic cholecystectomies, but Mühe was not. However, in 1999 he was recognized by SAGES for having performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy–sAGES invited Mühe to present the Storz Lecture. In Mühe's presentation, titled “The First Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” which he gave in March 1999 in San Antonio, Texas, he described the first procedure. Finally, Mühe had received the worldwide acclaim that he deserved for his pioneering work. One purpose of this article is to trace the development of the basic instruments used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The other purpose is to give Mühe the recognition he deserves for being the developer of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Which mesh for hernia repair?

            The concept of using a mesh to repair hernias was introduced over 50 years ago. Mesh repair is now standard in most countries and widely accepted as superior to primary suture repair. As a result, there has been a rapid growth in the variety of meshes available and choosing the appropriate one can be difficult. This article outlines the general properties of meshes and factors to be considered when selecting one. We performed a search of the medical literature from 1950 to 1 May 2009, as indexed by Medline, using the PubMed search engine (www.pubmed.gov). To capture all potentially relevant articles with the highest degree of sensitivity, the search terms were intentionally broad. We used the following terms: 'mesh, pore size, strength, recurrence, complications, lightweight, properties'. We also hand-searched the bibliographies of relevant articles and product literature to identify additional pertinent reports. The most important properties of meshes were found to be the type of filament, tensile strength and porosity. These determine the weight of the mesh and its biocompatibility. The tensile strength required is much less than originally presumed and light-weight meshes are thought to be superior due to their increased flexibility and reduction in discomfort. Large pores are also associated with a reduced risk of infection and shrinkage. For meshes placed in the peritoneal cavity, consideration should also be given to the risk of adhesion formation. A variety of composite meshes have been promoted to address this, but none appears superior to the others. Finally, biomaterials such as acellular dermis have a place for use in infected fields but have yet to prove their worth in routine hernia repair.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy.

              Surgeons have rapidly adopted minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques for a wide range of applications since the first laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 1983. At the helm of this MIS shift has been laparoscopy, with robotic surgery also gaining ground in a number of areas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Robot Surg
                Robot Surg
                Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews
                Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews
                Dove Medical Press
                2324-5344
                2017
                05 May 2017
                : 4
                : 57-67
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of General and Bariatric Surgery, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA, charand@ 123456baptisthealth.net
                [2 ]Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA, charand@ 123456baptisthealth.net
                [3 ]Population Health and Outcomes Research, Center for Research and Grants, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Charan Donkor, Department of General and Bariatric Surgery, Baptist Health South Florida, 7800 SW 87th Avenue, Suite B210, Miami, FL 33173, USA, Tel +1 305 271 9777, Email charand@ 123456baptisthealth.net
                Article
                rsrr-4-057
                10.2147/RSRR.S101809
                6193421
                30697564
                6bb313d2-c52c-406f-8e7f-568b81a7ffdf
                © 2017 Donkor et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                hernia,hernia repair,ventral,incisional,robotic,laparoscopic
                hernia, hernia repair, ventral, incisional, robotic, laparoscopic

                Comments

                Comment on this article