Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Artificial intelligence facilitates measuring reflux episodes and postreflux swallow‐induced peristaltic wave index from impedance‐pH studies in patients with reflux disease

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aim

          Reflux episodes and postreflux swallow‐induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index are useful impedance parameters that can augment the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, manual analysis of pH‐impedance tracings is time consuming, resulting in limited use of these novel impedance metrics. This study aims to evaluate whether a supervised learning artificial intelligence (AI) model is useful to identify reflux episodes and PSPW index.

          Methods

          Consecutive patients underwent 24‐h impedance‐pH monitoring were enrolled for analysis. Multiple AI and machine learning with a deep residual net model for image recognition were explored based on manual interpretation of reflux episodes and PSPW according to criteria from the Wingate Consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the strength of inter‐rater agreement of data between manual and AI interpretations.

          Results

          We analyzed 106 eligible patients with 7939 impedance events, of whom 38 patients with pathological acid exposure time (AET) and 68 patients with physiological AET. On the manual interpretation, patients with pathological AET had more reflux episodes and lower PSPW index than those with physiological AET. Overall accuracy of AI identification for reflux episodes and PSPW achieved 87% and 82%, respectively. Inter‐rater agreements between AI and manual interpretations achieved excellent for individual numbers of reflux episodes and PSPW index (ICC = 0.965 and ICC = 0.921).

          Conclusions

          AI has the potential to accurately and efficiently measure impedance metrics including reflux episodes and PSPW index. AI can be a reliable adjunct for measuring novel impedance metrics for GERD in the near future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

            Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus

              Clinical history, questionnaire data and response to antisecretory therapy are insufficient to make a conclusive diagnosis of GERD in isolation, but are of value in determining need for further investigation. Conclusive evidence for reflux on oesophageal testing include advanced grade erosive oesophagitis (LA grades C and D), long-segment Barrett’s mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal oesophageal acid exposure time (AET) >6% on ambulatory pH or pH-impedance monitoring. A normal endoscopy does not exclude GERD, but provides supportive evidence refuting GERD in conjunction with distal AET <4% and <40 reflux episodes on pH-impedance monitoring off proton pump inhibitors. Reflux-symptom association on ambulatory reflux monitoring provides supportive evidence for reflux triggered symptoms, and may predict a better treatment outcome when present. When endoscopy and pH or pH-impedance monitoring are inconclusive, adjunctive evidence from biopsy findings (histopathology scores, dilated intercellular spaces), motor evaluation (hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter, hiatus hernia and oesophageal body hypomotility on high-resolution manometry) and novel impedance metrics (baseline impedance, postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index) can add confidence for a GERD diagnosis; however, diagnosis cannot be based on these findings alone. An assessment of anatomy, motor function, reflux burden and symptomatic phenotype will therefore help direct management. Future GERD management strategies should focus on defining individual patient phenotypes based on the level of refluxate exposure, mechanism of reflux, efficacy of clearance, underlying anatomy of the oesophagogastric junction and psychometrics defining symptomatic presentations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Neurogastroenterology & Motility
                Neurogastroenterology Motil
                Wiley
                1350-1925
                1365-2982
                March 2023
                December 02 2022
                March 2023
                : 35
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University Hualien Taiwan
                [2 ] School of Post‐Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine Tzu Chi University Hualien Taiwan
                [3 ] AI Innovation Research Center, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Huealien Taiwan
                [4 ] NVIDIA AI Technology Center, NVIDIA Taipei Taiwan
                [5 ] Department of Medical Research Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Hualien Taiwan
                [6 ] Institute of Medical Sciences Tzu Chi University Hualien Taiwan
                Article
                10.1111/nmo.14506
                36458529
                6be8e8ad-8844-4bc5-909b-4694cb781562
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article