12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning ( PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal™ gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral‐opposed ( LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique ( LAO/ RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms ( DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability ( NTCP) for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/ RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/ RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that ≥ 9 mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9 mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer.

          To report the long-term results of a randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial for prostate cancer. From 1993 to 1998, a total of 301 patients with stage T1b to T3 prostate cancer were accrued to a randomized external beam dose escalation trial using 70 Gy versus 78 Gy. The median follow-up is now 8.7 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compute rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (nadir + 2), clinical failure, distant metastasis, disease-specific, and overall survival as well as complication rates at 8 years post-treatment. For all patients, freedom from biochemical or clinical failure (FFF) was superior for the 78-Gy arm, 78%, as compared with 59% for the 70-Gy arm (p = 0.004, and an even greater benefit was seen in patients with initial PSA >10 ng/ml (78% vs. 39%, p = 0.001). The clinical failure rate was significantly reduced in the 78-Gy arm as well (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.014). Twice as many patients either died of prostate cancer or are currently alive with cancer in the 70-Gy arm. Gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or greater occurred twice as often in the high dose patients (26% vs. 13%), although genitourinary toxicity of grade 2 or greater was less (13% vs. 8%) and not statistically significantly different. Dose-volume histogram analysis showed that the complication rate could be significantly decreased by reducing the amount of treated rectum. Modest escalation in radiotherapy dose improved freedom from biochemical and clinical progression with the largest benefit in prostate cancer patients with PSA >10 ng/ml.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury.

            The available dose/volume/outcome data for rectal injury were reviewed. The volume of rectum receiving >or=60 Gy is consistently associated with the risk of Grade >or=2 rectal toxicity or rectal bleeding. Parameters for the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model from four clinical series are remarkably consistent, suggesting that high doses are predominant in determining the risk of toxicity. The best overall estimates (95% confidence interval) of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters are n = 0.09 (0.04-0.14); m = 0.13 (0.10-0.17); and TD(50) = 76.9 (73.7-80.1) Gy. Most of the models of late radiation toxicity come from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy dose-escalation studies of early-stage prostate cancer. It is possible that intensity-modulated radiotherapy or proton beam dose distributions require modification of these models because of the inherent differences in low and intermediate dose distributions. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial: Dosimetric and Clinical Effects of Perirectal Spacer Application in Men Undergoing Prostate Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.

              Perirectal spacing, whereby biomaterials are placed between the prostate and rectum, shows promise in reducing rectal dose during prostate cancer radiation therapy. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled pivotal trial was performed to assess outcomes following absorbable spacer (SpaceOAR system) implantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hchung@umm.edu
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                21 November 2016
                January 2017
                : 18
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.2017.18.issue-1 )
                : 32-39
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiation Oncology University of Maryland Baltimore School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Florida Hospital Cancer Institute Orlando FL USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Radiation Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Heeteak Chung

                E‐mail: hchung@ 123456umm.edu

                Telephone: (410) 369 5323; Fax: (410) 347 0870

                Article
                ACM212001
                10.1002/acm2.12001
                5689902
                28291917
                6bfb5479-8531-444c-926d-688c6e37a29e
                © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 April 2016
                : 08 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 8, Words: 6248
                Categories
                87.53.Bn
                87.55.dk
                87.55ne
                87.56.bd
                Radiation Oncology Physics
                Radiation Oncology Physics
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                acm212001
                January 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.5 mode:remove_FC converted:16.11.2017

                proton beam scanning,prostate cancer,rectal spacers
                proton beam scanning, prostate cancer, rectal spacers

                Comments

                Comment on this article